Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Patch for scoping problem in lib/Transforms/Scalar/LowerGC.cpp"
2010 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r92458 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Target/README.txt lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll
Hi Bill-
For what it's worth, a simple truth table proves Chris correct.
Alastair
On 5 Jan 2010, at 02:46, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> Author: lattner
>> Date: Mon Jan 4 00:03:59 2010
>> New Revision: 92458
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=92458&view=rev
>> Log:
>>
2012 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r166875 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll
On 27.10.2012, at 18:24, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 27.10.2012, at 18:15, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>
>> How does this affect freestanding implementations?
>
> This transform is disabled with -fno-builtin or -ffreestanding.
Thinking a bit more about this, it looks like the way -ffreestanding is implemented in clang is
2012 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r157649 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/BoundsChecking.cpp
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:04:50 -0700
Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
> Originally on llvm-commits.
>
> On May 30, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote:
> >> This is probably fine for now. It's a relatively safe use of
> >> SCEVExpander and the least effort approach, but generally I would
> >> like to encourage
2012 May 30
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r157649 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/BoundsChecking.cpp
Originally on llvm-commits.
On May 30, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote:
>> This is probably fine for now. It's a relatively safe use of SCEVExpander and the least effort approach, but generally I would like to encourage people to solve local rewrite problems with IRBuilder, not SCEVExpander, and build useful utilities for that purpose. Just because you
2004 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Problem with 'const' in lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp
at line 216 'S' is declared with 'const' qualifier
const DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &S = it->second;
a few lines later an iterator over this set is asked for, instead of a
const_iterator -- Visual C (rightfully) flags this as an error. Here is
a patch...
m.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name:
2004 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Type problem in lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/ProfilePaths/GraphAuxiliary.cpp
On line 653 there is an assignment of a map with a user defined
comparision function to one with std::less -- doesn't compile on Visual
C and looks like a real error... Here is a patch.
m.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diff.txt
URL:
2005 Jan 19
1
[LLVMdev] Transforms/LevelRaise.cpp fails on packed types
Hello,
after I started using packed types things have gone quite well, but now
I hit a small problem again. The LevelRaise.cpp does some optimizing on
getting the first element of a struct/array -- and now also packed
types, so the assumption that if something is not a struct it must be an
array is false. The solution is simple: if it's not an array it's a
sequential type. Here is
2004 Oct 12
3
[LLVMdev] set_intersect and Visual C compiler
Hello,
This is my first post on this mailing list, so bear with me... My name
is Morten Ofstad and I work for Hue AS (www.hue.no), a company that
makes 3D Visualization software. We are looking into using LLVM for JIT
compiling shader programs, to replace our own (slow) VM. A requirement
for this is that we can compile LLVM in VS7.1, so I contacted Paolo
Invernizzi to find the status of his
2004 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] set_intersect and Visual C compiler
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote:
> This is my first post on this mailing list, so bear with me... My name
> is Morten Ofstad and I work for Hue AS (www.hue.no), a company that
> makes 3D Visualization software. We are looking into using LLVM for JIT
> compiling shader programs, to replace our own (slow) VM. A requirement
Neat!
> for this is that we can compile LLVM in
2013 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] Error: llvm/lib/Transforms/ObjCARC/ObjCARCOpts.cpp
Can anyone provide a fix to this error on the llvm trunk at the latest
revision ():
make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/svn-repos/llvm-svn-trunk/build/lib/Transforms/ObjCARC'
llvm[3]: Compiling ObjCARCOpts.cpp for Release+Debug+Asserts build
/usr/local/svn-repos/llvm-svn-trunk/llvm/lib/Transforms/ObjCARC/ObjCARCOpts.cpp:
In constructor
2013 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Error: llvm/lib/Transforms/ObjCARC/ObjCARCOpts.cpp
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can anyone provide a fix to this error on the llvm trunk at the latest
> revision ():
Sorry, that is revision 195934.
-Tom
2011 Jan 20
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r123754 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp test/Transforms/InstSimplify/2010-12-20-Distribute.ll
There's some interest in my "auto-simplifier", which is nice :), so let me
explain a bit about it.
On 19/01/11 19:35, Sandeep Patel wrote:
> You've mentioned your auto-simplifier a few times now and curiosity is
> getting the better of me. Can you explain it a bit more?
On 20/01/11 00:32, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what's this auto-simplifier?
2004 Oct 12
5
[LLVMdev] set_intersect and Visual C compiler
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:01:21 -0500 (CDT)
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote:
>
> > This is my first post on this mailing list, so bear with me... My name
> > is Morten Ofstad and I work for Hue AS (www.hue.no), a company that
> > makes 3D Visualization software. We are looking into using LLVM for JIT
> >
2004 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Fix for non-standard variable length array
Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> I submitted a patch with a std::vector, but was commited as alloca ;-P
for the other problem?
I made a nice clean patch using std::vector in LiveVariables.cpp now,
which I include with this message... By the way, where do you submit the
patches if not to the mailing list? I thought I should post here so
Paolo and others interested in the porting effort can apply
2004 Dec 03
1
[Fwd: [LLVMdev] GetElementPtr for packed types and VS build]
This needs to be applied as well.
Thanks,
Reid.
-----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Morten Ofstad <morten at hue.no>
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: [LLVMdev] GetElementPtr for packed types and VS build
> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:10:49 +0100
>
> As I was working with packed types it became apparent that I sometimes
>
2006 Jan 26
4
[LLVMdev] VS2005 patch
OK, fixed the problem with the intrin.h header that doesn't exist in previous versions of VS...
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: JIT.patch
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060126/7e55b0d0/attachment.ksh>
2008 May 21
4
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing
>I just sent a reply to Razvan with 3 patches that I think should be merged
>into the release branch. I want to keep it somewhat in sync with mainline.
>Can you try applying those 3 patches and let me know if it builds for you
>and what version of MSVC you have?
It doesn't build.
first problem is patch 51098 that adds lib\VMCore\Use.cpp and lib\Transforms\Utils\UnrollLoop.cpp
2004 Nov 08
2
[LLVMdev] Small patch for visual studio project files
We could also do the "cvs admin -kb" thing on all the project files so
that cvs won't do keyword expansion or line ending conversion.
Thoughts?
Reid.
On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 07:36, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> You have to use a version of CVS that's specifically built for Windows.
> You can find prebuilt Windows binaries at cvshome.org. The cygwin
> supplied CVS no doubt
2006 Jan 26
0
[LLVMdev] VS2005 patch
Hi Morten,
If you can make the VS2005 project files availiable on the net then I can
test them as I have VS2005 now, so then with Chris'es okay then they could
be distributed with LLVM.
Thanks,
Aaron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Morten Ofstad" <morten at hue.no>
To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 26,
2004 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Fix for non-standard variable length array + Visual C X86 specific code
Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> There was a similar problem some time ago, and was resolved with alloca.
> I think it's a better solution to use the stack instead of the heap...
I tend to agree, but the constructors won't get called if it's an object
array -- anyway, this particular case there was no objects, just
pointers and bools so alloca should be fine. I'll leave it to