similar to: [LLVMdev] eager about next monthly announce

thanks! --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hello LLVM fathers, 1. "languages, semantic trees" what do you think ideally, do languages implementations based on LLVM need internal semantic tree or they should rather try to use LLVM directly in/after syntax parsing? For languages like C++ the expected answer is "of course we need an internal semantic tree between parsing and LLVM!" But I am still

Valery, For any language with relatively sophisticated syntax and semantic rules, you will probably need a higher-level representation like an Abstract Syntax Tree in order to do type-checking and other kinds of checking. For OCAML, for example, the front-end is quite sophisticated and complex and the LLVM representation would not be suitable for supporting all the checking and translation. It

Hi all, compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with following output: ------- make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' ...skipped -------

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hello Reid and LLVMers, > 10. Basic support for distributed computations. What kind of support? What do you think should be included in LLVM directly, as opposed to being built on top of it? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

here is a script I use to make overlapping cut of my input "col.dat" file into a matrix: #---------------------------------- col2mat<-function(x, sampsz=220, qsamp=2000) { m<-matrix(nr=qsamp, nc=sampsz) for(s in 1:qsamp){ print(s) for(i in 1:sampsz){ m[s,i] <- x[s+i,1] } } m } w<-read.table("col.dat", check.names=FALSE) m<-col2mat(w)

Hi all there is a lot of changes/bugfixes as it was reported by Chris. Would it be possible to put new tarballs for last stable release? --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

Hi all, subj has the first line: #! /usr/dcs/software/supported/bin/bash I think we could be more liberalistic :) best regards, --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hello Brian, Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 7:21:04 PM, you wrote: BRG> This anomaly is noted in the documentation for building the C front-end BRG> (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html); in step 4 it advises BRG> you to edit src/configure and "change the first line (starting w/ #!) to BRG> contain the correct full pathname of sh." I got the links to the proper

Hello Reid and LLVMers, ... 10. Basic support for distributed computations. -- Best regards, Valery A.Khamenya mailto:khamenya at mail.ru Local Time: 19:48

Hello Chris, >> 10. Basic support for distributed computations. CL> What kind of support? What do you think should be included in LLVM CL> directly, as opposed to being built on top of it? nice question :) (don't sue me, I am far from being expert like you are!) just imagine, that we have Linux cluster, and we have two functions in one module (`f' and `g'). If they

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > just imagine, that we have Linux cluster, and we have two functions in > one module (`f' and `g'). If they are about to be executed at one host, > then one is allowed to do very aggressive interprocedural > optimizations between these `f' and `g'. However if `g' should be > "outsourced to" (i.e.

Hello Chris, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 8:06:03 PM, you wrote: CL> Makes sure that you have the C front-end installed correctly, and that CL> the configure script found it (you have to provide the path to the C CL> frontend to the configure script). hm... why cross-dependency?.. I thought llvm itself doesn't use cfront-end. P.S. Chris, I guess you know, but to be sure: your

Hello Chris, Wednesday, January 7, 2004, 9:37:19 PM, you wrote: CL> Typically distributed computing like this is performed at a much higher CL> level than things like LLVM. almost right, if you mean "distributed computing is usually implemented as some compiled libs". But if it is a part of the language then it is not as you say :) Well, Chris, let's forget about traditions

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

Hi Valery, On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:15 +0200, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi, > > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? About the best "roadmap" we have is the list of enhancements in Bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 Bug ID: 2596 Summary: Brother printer (((1~855~709~2847))) Technical Support Phone Number Brother Printer Customer Care Phone Number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW

Valery, I agree that there could be more examples of JIT-based interpreters, and I like your idea. When can you have it ready? :) Reid. On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 13:11, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi all, > > I think there is still too few docs/samples for those, > who'd like to write JIT-based interpreters. > > Today, the real examples to learn from are rather: > > -

Valery, That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Reid. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 >