similar to: [LLVMdev] debug intrinsic documentation

The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at all, so I had to work from my own sample codes, and generate test cases from them. Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: statement functions intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) loops, goto statments scalarized array operations function calls with *no arguments* simple common

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these: > > statement functions > intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc) > loops, goto statments > scalarized array operations > function calls with *no arguments* > simple common blocks Great! > Function calls with more than one argument don't work.

Hi there I have a problem with using Sweave in combination with the option driver = cacheSweave. Whichever code I try to run - when it comes to converting the tex file into pdf it comes up with the same errors (\csname \endcsname errors). Does anybody have an idea what it going wrong? > Sweave("pgfSweave-example.Rnw",driver = cacheSweaveDriver) Writing to file

Hi Pino, On 2/26/19 5:52 PM, Mike Latimer wrote: > On 2/21/19 3:07 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >> My question is: is using cirrus still the best choice for SUSE guests? >> If not, what about using qxl as well, as done for any non-SUSE guest? >> (We can also do that depending on the version of the guest, in case >> only newer SUSE versions work fine with qxl). > At the

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > the bytecode with lli - I get the following error: > > $ lli -load=/home/mmccrack/linux/lib/libTau.sh leo-inline-300-tau.bc > ERROR: Program used external function > '__llvm_cxxeh_allocate_exception' which could not be resolved! This is most likely because you are trying to link with llvmgcc, not with llvm-g++. Make sure that

A On 3/21/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/21/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > > > > Hi, I'm trying to access an analysis pass from the Inliner pass, and > > > I'm having a lot of trouble getting that to work - I can verify that > >

Hi, I'm guessing that no one has tried this exact combination yet. I'm trying to build the gcc4.2 front end with current LLVM SVN on a G4 Powerbook running 10.4.10. I started with this: ../gcc4.2-trunk/configure --prefix=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/llvm-gcc-4-2/install --enable-llvm=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/llvm-svn-obj/ --with-gmp=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/llvm-gcc-4-2/libdeps

Hi, I have a large-ish application I'm trying to build with LLVM, so I replaced g++ in the Makefiles with llvm-g++. This appears to work fine when I pass -Wl,-native to generate an ELF executable, but I want to control the inlining threshold it uses, so I am now passing -Wl,-disable-inlining and -Wa,-disable-inlining, and having it generate LLVM bytecode, then running opt -inlining to generate

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello I try to setup a bridge firewall base on http://shorewall.net/bridge.html I''m using shorewall-1.4.10g-1. I doublecheck on /etc/shorewall/routestopped file on my firewall, and there is no "OPTIONS" options. Should I use different shorewall version ? Thanks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

On 9/1/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/1/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: [snip] > Now f951 doesn't crash when compiling, but still can't compile the > libgfortran files. It now finds some syntax errors in a generated file > that's part of the intrinsics

OK, that explains it. I probably didn't have runtest installed the last time I ran configure, and re-syncing with CVS also caused it to reconfigure, solving the problem but confusing me. Thanks, -mike On 8/24/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this

Hi, I am trying to do something similar to the profiling target in the llvm-test suite makefiles, but I'm not a gmake expert, so I am stumped on something: I did some copy-and-paste of the profile code in llvm-test/Makefile.programs and got it working within SingleSource/Benchmarks, where I can say 'make pmf' or 'make profile' and get a build with profiling results or my own

OK, I noticed a few problems with my previous email, so I will boil the question down: What I want to do is compile for x86 and ia64 from darwin. I also want to load my own passes into opt and llc. Should I be using llvmc at all here, or should I be doing something like llvmgcc -> gccas -> opt -> llc ? I've given up on the filetype=obj argument, so now the problem is that llc is

On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Michael McCracken wrote: > Hi, the idea of a dragon theme reminded me of the dragon-like serpents > called "Nāga" from Cambodian mythology, among other places. Interesting, my only comment is if we pick this we need to just spell it Naga. Naga are also snake people in D&D (yea... I know). > > Here's a brief link explaining the

On 9/11/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > >> be though. > > > > I'm thinking that effort on 4.0.1 gfortran is not worthwhile, since > > 4.0.1 fails to compile some pretty basic examples, and there are some > > pretty extensive changes between then and 4.2. > > ok > > >>

On Fri, October 28, 2016 11:50 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 28/10/2016 16:28, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: >> >> On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >>>> For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >>>> - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >>>>

Hi, in trying to build an llvm-gfortran on linux from today's gcc4 SVN, I get the following link errors that didn't show up on OS X. This is also using LLVM CVS from this morning. They appear to mostly be related to CodeWarrior compatibility code, but a couple are less obvious. What's the best way to fix this? I'm stuck without my powerbook for at least three weeks and I'd

I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as LLVM moves to gcc 4.2. For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler test suite? Cheers, -mike On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Duraid, > > > Does anyone know what the

I'm having troubles running the test suite on OS X 10.4. Inside my objdir, 'make check' gives this: % make check llvm[0]: Running test suite

Hi Michael and Dirk, there are raising concerns that, as of today's computing power, an attacker can generate a GPG key that has the same short ID as a target key. In this situation, it may be possible that a user downloads and trusts the attacker's GPG key, and as a consequence installs malware. For that reason (better explained in http://lwn.net/Articles/697417/), it is recommended to