similar to: [LLVMdev] SlowOperationInformer.cpp:55: error: `SIGALRM' undeclared (first use this functi

Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi > > I'm compiling: /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp > on MinGW. However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: Is there an alarm() syscall on MinGW? And if so, what signal does it send (according to the MinGW docs)? -- John T. > -------------------------- > @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib

Ultimately, this is another function that needs to go into lib/System. An alternate approach is to fork a thread, sleep, and when the thread wakes up, "ring the alarm". Reid. John Criswell wrote: > Henrik Bach wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm compiling: >> /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. >> However, it stops

There's simply no equivalent to signals on Windows. There is no way to asynchronously interrupt a thread's processing to execute some handler. The only thing you can asynchronously do to a thread is kill it, and that's generally frowned upon (who knows what critical sections it might be holding, etc...). Stuff like alarms is supposed to be done using the "event-driven"

>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:03:44 -0700 > >I just discovered that the *only* place this is used is in the debugger >when it is loading files, etc. There should be a way to do this without an >alarm. In fact, a thread could easily set the "ShouldShowStatus" every >second until the the thing is cancelled. Since the

To be more specific: Lines containing SIGALRM and alarm(). >From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:21:58 +0200 > >>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >>Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:03:44 -0700 >> >>I just discovered that the *only* place this is used is in the debugger >>when it is loading

Hi, I get below error: --------------------------------- In file included from /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/Path.cpp:23, from /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/System/Path.cpp:27: /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/../Unix/Path.cpp: In member function `bool llvm::sys::Path::create_directory(bool)': /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/../Unix/Path.cpp:343:

Hi, I get this error: ------------------ ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ------------------ And the config.log shows that configure has detected that ld on my platform (Interix) doesn't support shared libraries: ------------------

Hi again Does cygwin support shared libraries. And if not, how did you port llvm on this issue? /Henrik >From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:41:53 +0200 > >Hi, > >I get this error: >------------------ >ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >ToolRunner.cpp:396:

Reid, >Well, if it doesn't break anything else, I'd fix the header file. The >standard type name is supposed to uint64_t not u_int64_t. I would just >change the header file to define both of them, something like: > >typedef u_int64_t uint64_t; > >You could do that in /usr/include/types.h, I've tried it and it doesn't break anything, but ... >or we could

Hi Can someone tell me, which files you get in the confstat* directory, when running: ./config.status -d /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- _________________________________________________________________ Opret en gratis Hotmail-konto http://www.hotmail.com med udsigt til 250 MB lagerkapacitet

Hi I've started to port LLVM to the MinGW Win32 platform. To successfully recognize the platform, following statements should be inserted into the configure script: ---------- Index: configure ================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/configure,v retrieving revision 1.114 diff -u -r1.114 configure --- configure 7 Sep 2004 18:04:45 -0000

Hi As shown below, the .\configure script found a version of stat.h: --------------------- configure:4382: checking for sys/stat.h configure:4399: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:4402: $? = 0 configure:4405: test -s conftest.o configure:4408: $? = 0 configure:4419: result: yes --------------------- However, I got this error when compiling: --------------------- FileUtilities.cpp:

Hi When compiling UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp, I get these errors: ----------------------- C:/MinGW/msys/local/projects/src/llvm/lib/Debugger/UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp:41:22: sys/wait.h: No such file or directory C:/MinGW/msys/local/projects/src/llvm/lib/Debugger/UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp: In member function `void <unnamed>::IP::startChild(llvm::Module*, const

Yes, that's my understanding, too. But I'm not controlling where my library -ldbghelp is put when g++ is called. I just put it in the TOOLLINKOPTS variable in Makefile.config. Henrik >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> > >John Criswell wrote: >> >>It seems that the -L path options are specified before the LLVM libraries >>(libSystem and

This file (UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp) is due for porting and placement in lib/System but I haven't gotten there yet. If you come up with something that works on MINGW, please let me know. Thanks, Reid. Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi > > When compiling UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp, I get these errors: > ----------------------- >

Hi, Has some one committed these patches into CVS? Paolo, thanks for the patches. In the near future I'll try to compile them. I've installed STLport 6.4.2 with vc6. Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Hi Reid, I downloaded the latest source code and ran configure (I suppose it was that you did mean). The result is: --------------- checking build system type... i586-pc-interix3 --------------- Otherwise, please correct me. /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Devang Patel wrote: >> I think libhello should drop its use of SlowOperationInformer. > > That'll fix Hello example. However, anyone trying to load their custom > pass will likely to run into this again. It is a long-standing issue. The deal is that libsupport (and many others) are .a files. If one of the .o files in the .a file is used by a plugin, but

Gidday everbody, We have just found an interesting issue regarding the sshd daemon on our SuSE system. For some reasons, the /usr/sbin/sshd process blocks SIGALRM as shown in the /proc/pid/status: $ cat /proc/`cat /var/run/sshd.init.pid`/status Name: sshd State: S (sleeping) SleepAVG: 0% [...] SigPnd: 0000000000000000 ShdPnd: 0000000000000000 SigBlk: 0000000000002000 <-- SIGALRM is

On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Devang Patel wrote: >> And this brings back CommandLine Error: Arugment blah defined more >> than once! >> >> And without this, opt -load .../LLVMHello.dylib -hello does not work >> on Darwin because dyld is not able to find SlowerOperationInformer ;) > > I think libhello should drop