similar to: [LLVMdev] struct and class under VC7.1

MSVC++ is picky about this. It considers classes and structs to be different types so you have to be consistent. If you forward declared a struct as a class within the same compilation unit, it would complain about that too. It's not just linking. On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:59:42 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > Hi all, > > Finally I managed to find

On Sep 23, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > MSVC++ is picky about this. It considers classes and structs to be > different types so you have to be consistent. If you forward declared > a > struct as a class within the same compilation unit, it would complain > about that too. It's not just linking. You are right... BTW, I've just fixed that problem in my checkout

I have just committed a change to Value.h that changes the Value class from using a "struct" declaration to a "class" declaration. I'm not sure why VC7.1 would generate different symbols for class vs. struct. I'm pretty certain that's a violation of the ABI. In any event, we should be consistent. The Value class is declared "class Value" in numerous places

I'll wait for the research. We should try, as much as possible, to make it work with just what the compiler provides and without third party packages. Thanks, reid. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 07:46, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I added the include of cstudio and it fails with plain VC7.1; the file > does not exist. > > Add it for now. If it is impossible to build with VC7.1 and without

On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:04 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I cannot find any specific instructions for uninstalling the VC++ 2005 > Express Edition. There is this README file: > http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/readme/default.aspx. As > it isn't the full Visual Studio it probably isn't messing around with > Windows system files. > > I do know for a fact that the

Hi, Has some one committed these patches into CVS? Paolo, thanks for the patches. In the near future I'll try to compile them. I've installed STLport 6.4.2 with vc6. Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Adding an include for std::remove under vc7.1 --- Paolo Invernizzi -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: diff.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040924/e1ca1218/attachment.txt>

On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of > course, it is required that you uninstall the beta before installing a > newer beta or the release version. Urrggg! I

<algorithm> works too. On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:09:21 -0500 Alkis Evlogimenos <alkis at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 09:43, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > > >But I compiled that under vc7.1 as it was! > > > > > > > > ;-(( > > > > Probably is an implicid includes, but I'm using the

But I compiled that under vc7.1 as it was! On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:19:22 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > Adding an include for std::remove under vc7.1 > > --- > Paolo Invernizzi >

Someone needs to adjudicate on whether I add the #include of <cstdio> or not. I can't test this so, Paolo/Henrik/Jeff, please let me know if I need to add it. Thanks, Reid. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 07:08, Jeff Cohen wrote: > But I compiled that under vc7.1 as it was! > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:19:22 +0200 > Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > >

I checked right now that it compiles also with #include <iostream> Jeff, can you test it with plain VC? --- Paolo Invernizzi On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:52 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'll wait for the research. We should try, as much as possible, to make > it work with just what the compiler provides and without third party > packages. > > Thanks, > > reid. > >

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:02:12 -0500 (CDT) Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > I'd like to directly create executable code that i can > > stick in memory somewhere and jump into (call). > > Take a look at the llvm/examples directory. There are several small > programs that create LLVM IR on the fly and JIT compile it. I'm trying to take

It would be great to avoid STLPort and use plain vanilla VC... as I told, the biggest difference it's how the hash_map and hash_set are implemented, but I'm not so strong in C++ for resolving the iussue. About the build procedure, it's based on scons, and it's still at a very preliminary stage... Right now I'm trying to build TableGen with it, as till now I've always

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Simon Burton wrote: > > Is it possible to get llvm to generate native machine code > without using gcc and friends ? Do I use lli ? LLVM only needs llvm-gcc to translate from C/C++ to LLVM IR. If you already have code in LLVM IR form (e.g. because you're generating it on the fly or you have your own front-end) you don't need llvm-gcc. > I'd like to

Simon Burton <simon at arrowtheory.com> writes: > I'm trying to take assembly and create machine code I can execute. > How close am I ? Your test case is not complete. Besides, which version of llvm are you using? What are the commands for compiling and linking your test case? How it bombs? Do you #include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h" ? -- Oscar

Hi, all I found the example code examples/HowToUseJIT.cpp also shows the same error. Attachment is the LLVM module created by HowToUseJIT. And here is the error, Running foo: %X4<def> = LDtoc <ga:@add1>, %X2 UNREACHABLE executed! Stack dump: 0. Running pass 'PowerPC Machine Code Emitter' on function '@foo' Aborted Currently, I use gdb try to track down

Hi, all I have a trouble with calling external functions on PowerPC. What I am doing is generating a LLVM IR first like this, - x86 call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !12 - ppc call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !10 After lowering above LLVM IR for x86 and ppc, it becomes: - x86 %RAX<def> = MOV64ri

I added the include of cstudio and it fails with plain VC7.1; the file does not exist. Add it for now. If it is impossible to build with VC7.1 and without STLPort, then there really isn't a choice. I have to research the issue myself to see if it's possible to avoid using STLPort. On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:51 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Someone needs

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:51:08 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of >