similar to: [LLVMdev] Files to lib/System/Win32

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:25:11 -0700 > >On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:46:31 +0200 >"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > > >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:24:47 -0700 > > > > > > > > >But there are some

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:24:47 -0700 > > >But there are some issues with System I'm going to have to take care of >besides using Win32. There appears to be some Unix assumptions like the >presence of /etc or the HOME environment variable. Neither have any >true equivalent in Windows. > Will be fixed in a working

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > >Uh... shouldn't a Win32 port use the Win32 API? > Well, as I see it LLVM contains only tools that are perfectably manageble through a shell. And in this respect, I see the win32/mingw port perfectably achieves this at the moment. >On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:11:51 +0200 >"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:44:08 -0700 > >It's not hard in the sense that MSDN has sample code that does this. >It's not much more than cut and paste. But I could make it compile >conditionally so that it will compile only with Microsoft's compiler. > Leave it open as an excise. I'll barf if it's necessary

Hi Here is my first patches to the Win32 platform. They compile on the mingw platform. I haven't test them yet, but I thought it will best to put them in the save, just in case... /Henrik _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk/ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and

Henrik, The patches you submitted will not work (at all) for the Win32 platform because they (still) use Unix system calls. Win32 doesn't have mkdtemp, fork, execve, etc. Furthermore in Path.cpp forward slashes are still used. These need to be changed to back slashes. So, I'm not familiar with mingw platform. Since you've stated they compile on your mingw platform, I'm assuming

Uh... shouldn't a Win32 port use the Win32 API? On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:11:51 +0200 "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Here is my first patches to the Win32 platform. > > They compile on the mingw platform. > > I haven't test them yet, but I thought it will best to put them in the save, > just in case... > >

This sounds suspiciously like the problem I ran into with VC++, whose std implementation also includes _Distance. Could mingw have copied VC++ too closely? The fix with VC++ was to add a "using std::_Distance" line (or just "using namespace std". Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > >> when building the llvm cfe (3.4 derivative), for

> >> >>I did successfully compile all those files with VC++ 7.1. Does mingw >>come with it's own version of windows.h or are you using the official >>Microsoft header files? >> > >Due to legal issues with Microsoft, they (mingw development team) have >supplied their own header files to support the win32 API. > To be exact, I use mingws own header

Hi, I get this error: --------------- configure: configuring in projects/Stacker configure: running /bin/sh '/C/projects/src/llvm-2/llvm/projects/Stacker/configure' --prefix=/C/LLVM/tools/ '--prefix=/C/LLVM/tools/' 'CPPFLAGS=-D__MINGW -DLLVM_ON_WIN32=1' --cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=/C/projects/src/llvm-2/llvm/projects/Stacker configure: error: invalid variable

Yes, Chris you're right. It seems that my << operator for int64_t is missing in my '/opt/gcc.3.3/include/c++/3.3/bits/ostream.tcc' file. Which ordinary version of GCC are you working with and how do your definition of the << operator for int64_t look like? /Henrik > >Here is an excerpt from the config.log for LLVM: > >configure:19451: checking for int64_t

============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ =============================================================

Hi Jeff, _HEAPOK is unknown to mingw 1.0 (which is the official release). Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

Hi, This minor patch clarify matters in the CFEBuildInstrs.html file in my view. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

Yes, it should. I haven't reviewed Henrik's change set yet but if it doesn't look like clean Win32 code then I will create a separate target named MingW and adjust the configure script accordingly. On the other hand, no one has submitted any Win32 patches yet, so first come first served :) Reid. On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 19:35, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Uh... shouldn't a Win32 port use

Hi, Today I've succeded in compiling the llvm-tools, llvm-gcc and stacker frontend and in installing it. Uptill now I've followed the steps given in: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html with modifications for the mingw platform. I'll return with step-by-step instructions how to do it on this platform. Cheers Henrik :)

Here is an excerpt from the config.log: configure:19451: checking for int64_t configure:19476: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:19479: $? = 0 configure:19482: test -s conftest.o configure:19485: $? = 0 configure:19496: result: yes configure:19511: checking for uint64_t configure:19536: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:19539: $? = 0 configure:19542: test -s conftest.o

>From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:10:29 +0200 > >>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >>Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:25:11 -0700 >> >>On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:46:31 +0200 >>"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >From: Jeff Cohen

>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:07:16 -0700 > >Henrik, > >The patches you submitted will not work (at all) for the Win32 platform >because they (still) use Unix system calls. Win32 doesn't have mkdtemp, >fork, execve, etc. Furthermore in Path.cpp forward slashes are still >used. These need to be changed to back slashes. >

>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:54:57 -0700 > >Yes, it should. I haven't reviewed Henrik's change set yet but if it >doesn't look like clean Win32 code then I will create a separate target >named MingW and adjust the configure script accordingly. > I've looked up in the VC and win32 api documentation, and it is truely