similar to: [LLVMdev] Changes to configure to recognize MinGW Win32 platform

Hi I'm compiling: /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: -------------------------- @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib --tag=disable-shared --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -c -I/usr/local/build/llvm/lib/Support -I/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support -I/usr/local/build/llvm/include

Reid, >Well, if it doesn't break anything else, I'd fix the header file. The >standard type name is supposed to uint64_t not u_int64_t. I would just >change the header file to define both of them, something like: > >typedef u_int64_t uint64_t; > >You could do that in /usr/include/types.h, I've tried it and it doesn't break anything, but ... >or we could

Hi Can someone tell me, which files you get in the confstat* directory, when running: ./config.status -d /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- _________________________________________________________________ Opret en gratis Hotmail-konto http://www.hotmail.com med udsigt til 250 MB lagerkapacitet

Hi, I get below error: --------------------------------- In file included from /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/Path.cpp:23, from /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/System/Path.cpp:27: /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/../Unix/Path.cpp: In member function `bool llvm::sys::Path::create_directory(bool)': /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/../Unix/Path.cpp:343:

Hi As shown below, the .\configure script found a version of stat.h: --------------------- configure:4382: checking for sys/stat.h configure:4399: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:4402: $? = 0 configure:4405: test -s conftest.o configure:4408: $? = 0 configure:4419: result: yes --------------------- However, I got this error when compiling: --------------------- FileUtilities.cpp:

Yes, that's my understanding, too. But I'm not controlling where my library -ldbghelp is put when g++ is called. I just put it in the TOOLLINKOPTS variable in Makefile.config. Henrik >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> > >John Criswell wrote: >> >>It seems that the -L path options are specified before the LLVM libraries >>(libSystem and

Ultimately, this is another function that needs to go into lib/System. An alternate approach is to fork a thread, sleep, and when the thread wakes up, "ring the alarm". Reid. John Criswell wrote: > Henrik Bach wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm compiling: >> /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp on MinGW. >> However, it stops

Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi > > I'm compiling: /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support/SlowOperationInformer.cpp > on MinGW. However, it stops complaining about that SIGALRM is undeclared: Is there an alarm() syscall on MinGW? And if so, what signal does it send (according to the MinGW docs)? -- John T. > -------------------------- > @ /usr/local/build/llvm/mklib

Hi When compiling UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp, I get these errors: ----------------------- C:/MinGW/msys/local/projects/src/llvm/lib/Debugger/UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp:41:22: sys/wait.h: No such file or directory C:/MinGW/msys/local/projects/src/llvm/lib/Debugger/UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp: In member function `void <unnamed>::IP::startChild(llvm::Module*, const

Hi, I get this error: ------------------ ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ------------------ And the config.log shows that configure has detected that ld on my platform (Interix) doesn't support shared libraries: ------------------

Hi again Does cygwin support shared libraries. And if not, how did you port llvm on this issue? /Henrik >From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:41:53 +0200 > >Hi, > >I get this error: >------------------ >ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >ToolRunner.cpp:396:

There's simply no equivalent to signals on Windows. There is no way to asynchronously interrupt a thread's processing to execute some handler. The only thing you can asynchronously do to a thread is kill it, and that's generally frowned upon (who knows what critical sections it might be holding, etc...). Stuff like alarms is supposed to be done using the "event-driven"

This file (UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp) is due for porting and placement in lib/System but I haven't gotten there yet. If you come up with something that works on MINGW, please let me know. Thanks, Reid. Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi > > When compiling UnixLocalInferiorProcess.cpp, I get these errors: > ----------------------- >

Hi, Has some one committed these patches into CVS? Paolo, thanks for the patches. In the near future I'll try to compile them. I've installed STLport 6.4.2 with vc6. Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Hi Reid, I downloaded the latest source code and ran configure (I suppose it was that you did mean). The result is: --------------- checking build system type... i586-pc-interix3 --------------- Otherwise, please correct me. /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:46:42 -0700 >FileParser.tab.c: In function `int Fileparse()': >FileParser.tab.c:2043: error: syntax error before `goto' > >The offending lines bison generated are: > >/*----------------------------------------------------. >| yyerrlab1 -- error raised explicitly by an action. |

Reid, >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:08:37 -0700 > >Henrik, > >Since Interix is POSIX and SUS compatible, I've separated its Another posting on Interix forum, has revealed that Interix conforms to POSIX.1 and SUS. But, I don't think this will break your platform separation. /Henrik

Who takes action on this? >From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:16:53 -0500 > >Henrik Bach wrote: >>Reid, >> >>>Well, if it doesn't break anything else, I'd fix the header file. The >>>standard type name is supposed to uint64_t not u_int64_t. I would just >>>change the header file to define both

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:43:34 -0700 > >OK, I stand corrected: mingw can be used to create honest-to-goodness >Windows applications using Win32. But you're still using it as a Unix >emulator :) > OK, if POSIX.1 is unix emulation then we have that all *nix emulates all *nix and that's fine with me :) OK, I admit,

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:35:36 -0700 > >What's a "compiling mesh?" What I meant, was that there are some implicit defines in mingw (like __GCC) and vcX (like _MVC) but possibly also other unsupported? internal structures. As I stated earlier mingw should be win32 api compliant, but not for complicating matters. But