similar to: [LLVMdev] compilation error after updated from cvs:

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0400, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Building PowerPC.td register information header with tblgen > Included from PowerPC.td:22: > Parsing PowerPCInstrInfo.td:53: Variable not defined: 'GPRC'! > make[3]: *** [PowerPCGenRegisterInfo.h.inc] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/ssrc/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC' > > maybe I just

Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0400, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > >>Building PowerPC.td register information header with tblgen >>Included from PowerPC.td:22: >>Parsing PowerPCInstrInfo.td:53: Variable not defined: 'GPRC'! >>make[3]: *** [PowerPCGenRegisterInfo.h.inc] Error 1 >>make[3]: Leaving directory

> This is fixed in CVS. You might consider upgrading to LLVM CVS, > especially if you are interested in looking at performance issues: several > important performance related patches have gone in since LLVM 1.2. OK, now i've really upgraded to CVS, but it looks like state of sources is "not compilable" :( indeed: *************************** Linking llc release executable

> > yesterday I got new SuSE 9.1 DVD, so i am going to enter this > > river again. Perhaps, this time all will be fine. > > Sounds great, please let me know how it goes. SuSE 9.1 is running OK. after 30 minute of compilation i get first errors: ********************* make[2]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/llvm/runtime/libtrace' make[2]: Entering directory

Hi LLVMers, there were a gcc ICE problem discussed in current mail list. Chris was right here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-December/000693.html saying that the PR 12544 is not really the corresponding issue :) The correct one is PR 13392: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13392 Interesting fact is that -O2 (or -O3) goes somehow around this

Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language implementations? How good is LLVM for this? E.g., is it natural to expect that the LLVM-based implementation of the language Concurrent Clean be any faster than its reference implementation? Best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi LLVMers, the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible optimizations are really invoked. Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 on my Athlon XP 1500. Nice. P.S. guys, no fears, I don't plan to flood the cvs repository with my "brilliant" examples ;) --- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

Hi all, web-browser access to cvs is of course nice, but is it possible to provide anonymous read-only access to llvm cvs? (it would be nice to have an ability just download last sources) P.S. BTW, this and previous my post were actually motivated by desire to find some simple example on JIT usage :) --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hello LLVM fathers, 1. "languages, semantic trees" what do you think ideally, do languages implementations based on LLVM need internal semantic tree or they should rather try to use LLVM directly in/after syntax parsing? For languages like C++ the expected answer is "of course we need an internal semantic tree between parsing and LLVM!" But I am still

Hi all, I think there is still too few docs/samples for those, who'd like to write JIT-based interpreters. Today, the real examples to learn from are rather: - lli.cpp - ModuleMaker.cpp - Stacker which is still unfortunatelly not that much about JITing :( Well, what I am going to sell: What about very small JIT-based example similar to ModuleMaker? I mean example, where, say, two

Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also

Hi all maybe it is of interest for someone: I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux (even on exotic x86-compatible CPU). Things seem to be running OK. This is a good prerequisite for making llvm ebuild script and promote llvm to hackers of fast-growing progressive Gentoo world. -- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi all, compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with following output: ------- make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' ...skipped -------

Hi all see $subj http://www.google.com/trends?q=llvm congrats! P.S. sorry if known. best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080318/2bfc6887/attachment.html>

here is a script I use to make overlapping cut of my input "col.dat" file into a matrix: #---------------------------------- col2mat<-function(x, sampsz=220, qsamp=2000) { m<-matrix(nr=qsamp, nc=sampsz) for(s in 1:qsamp){ print(s) for(i in 1:sampsz){ m[s,i] <- x[s+i,1] } } m } w<-read.table("col.dat", check.names=FALSE) m<-col2mat(w)

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hello Reid and LLVMers, > 10. Basic support for distributed computations. What kind of support? What do you think should be included in LLVM directly, as opposed to being built on top of it? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

On Sat, 1 May 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > > > yesterday I got new SuSE 9.1 DVD, so i am going to enter this > > > river again. Perhaps, this time all will be fine. > > > > Sounds great, please let me know how it goes. > > SuSE 9.1 is running OK. > after 30 minute of compilation i get first errors: > *********************

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

Hi OpenC++ developers, IMHO, the LLVM project (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/) could give a second breath to OpenC++ project. Indeed, the implementations of reflection become quite restricted if the just-in-time (JIT) compiling is not available. Am i wrong? --- Valery A.Khamenya