similar to: [LLVMdev] ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (firstuse this function)

Hi again Does cygwin support shared libraries. And if not, how did you port llvm on this issue? /Henrik >From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:41:53 +0200 > >Hi, > >I get this error: >------------------ >ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >ToolRunner.cpp:396:

Hi, I get this error: ------------------ ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ------------------ And the config.log shows that configure has detected that ld on my platform (Interix) doesn't support shared libraries: ------------------

>From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0500 (CDT) > >There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments >protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef >to include internix. > Sorry Chris, but my DataTypes.h.in seems to be outdated (due to I'm porting LLVM 1.2), so I'm not

>From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:11:03 -0500 > > >The DataTypes.h header file is generated by the configure script and placed >into your build tree. My best guess is that your system's header files do >not correctly define these macros, so they are missing. > I did a search on the build and source trees, but neither

>From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0500 (CDT) >The file you need to modify is here: >llvm/include/Support/DataTypes.h.in > >There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments >protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef >to include internix. > Sorry, Chris, but my

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > >There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments > >protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef > >to include internix. > > > > Sorry Chris, but my DataTypes.h.in seems to be outdated (due to I'm porting > LLVM 1.2), so I'm not at the moment able to edit the

Dear all, I have been trying to build R-2.5.1 on the Interix-6.0 Unix subsystem that ships with Vista and everything looks fine during the configure except towards the end when "sed" throws an error: sed: 1: ""s/\*/\\\*/g"": invalid command code " A few lines later I then get: ./configure: : bad substitution So I guess sed is trying to do something and

Hi > >Are you able to explain below meaning to me? > >#if defined(_ALL_SOURCE) \ > || (defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED==1)) \ > || (__STDC__ - 0 == 0 && !defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE)) >extern char* __cdecl strdup(const char *); >#endif /* defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED == 1) */ > (RTFM) Some of the above

Hi Guys I'm trying to port and build LLVM to the Interix environment. I've succeded until the Interix version of gcc program executes: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' Compiling CommandLine.cpp CommandLine.cpp: In function

Hi Guys I'm trying to port and build the GCC Front End to the Interix environment. I've succeded until the xgcc program executes: /usr/local/src/cfrontend/build/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/src/cfrontend/build/gcc/ -B/usr/local/src/cfrontend/install//i586-pc-interix3/bin/ -B/usr/local/src/cfrontend/install//i586-pc-interix3/lib/ -isystem

Hi Guys I'm trying to port and build LLVM to the Interix environment. I've succeded until the Interix version of gcc program executes: Before the patch: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' Compiling CommandLine.cpp

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > Personally I think that we've waited much too long for the 1.3 release, BTW, for those who are interested in the differences between 1.2 and CVS, check out: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew Note that the release notes still need to be polished, but you'll get the basic idea. -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:05:21 -0500 (CDT) Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > BTW, for those who are interested in the differences between 1.2 and CVS, > check out: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew It might be a good idea to add a check-in script that puts the latest version of the pending ReleaseNotes.html into the web site directory and then link

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:05:21 -0500 (CDT) > Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > BTW, for those who are interested in the differences between 1.2 and CVS, > > check out: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew > > It might be a good idea to add a check-in script that puts the latest >

Silly me. Perhaps then just a more prominent link on the main page with something like a "what's coming in the next release" label ? Reid. On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:16:33 -0500 (CDT) Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > That is exactly what the http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ directory is: a > mirror of the docs directory in CVS. It's autoupdated on every

>From: "Reid Spencer" <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:33:30 -0400 > >On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT) > Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: >>Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks... > >Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on >CPR? Anything else? We're starting to

Hi Reid, I downloaded the latest source code and ran configure (I suppose it was that you did mean). The result is: --------------- checking build system type... i586-pc-interix3 --------------- Otherwise, please correct me. /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > Another thing that is on my short list for 1.3 is to get as many .bc > > format changes out of the way as possible so the backwards compat code in > > the .bc reader is simpler. In particular, I would at least like to get > > placeholders for PR263 and maybe PR400. > > This I strongly agree with. We need to minimize impact

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT) > Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks... > > Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on CPR? > Anything else? We're starting to get some traction with more developers and > I think doing

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT) Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks... Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on CPR? Anything else? We're starting to get some traction with more developers and I think doing a release sooner rather than later might be worth it for all parties