similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM Server Back Up

Reid Spencer wrote: > John, > > The rsyncd doesn't seem to be up. See the attached email. The mirror > tries to sync every 30 minutes and this is what I'm getting from the > cron job. This was from the sync attempted at 2:12pm (PDT) today. I think I got it working. Can you try it again and let me know if it works? Thanks. -- John T. > > Reid. > > John

John, The rsyncd doesn't seem to be up. See the attached email. The mirror tries to sync every 30 minutes and this is what I'm getting from the cron job. This was from the sync attempted at 2:12pm (PDT) today. Reid. John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Our main server is back up, and all LLVM services (CVS, website, etc) > should be up and available for use. > >

And here's why: > rsync -az --delete --exclude='#*' --stats --bwlimit=256 rsync://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/LLVM/ /home/llvm/cvs > rsync: failed to connect to llvm.cs.uiuc.edu: Connection refused > rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(83) John, can you please look into this? Most likely the xinetd needs to be restarted.I'm not sure when it started failing,

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:56:57AM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > And here's why: > > > rsync -az --delete --exclude='#*' --stats --bwlimit=256 rsync://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/LLVM/ /home/llvm/cvs > > rsync: failed to connect to llvm.cs.uiuc.edu: Connection refused > > rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(83) > > John, can you please look

Dear LLVM Developers, The LLVM website, CVS repository, and SAFECode website should now be back online. Should you encounter any problems with the LLVM services, please send email to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu so that we may fix it. Regards, John T. Criswell ********************************************************************* * John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu

Devang Patel wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:01 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Devang Patel, >>>> >>>> In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to >>>> requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by

Dear Devang Patel, In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by reversing the order of the calls to AU.addRequired()? -- John T. -- John T. Criswell jcriswel at bigw.org "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh.

Dear All, Do people think that they are ready to create the LLVM 1.6 release branch? I believe all the development is pretty much done. Is all the documentation in the LLVM source tree updated and ready? I'm not able to make a full doc review like I've been able to do in previous releases, so I need volunteers to work on the docs if they're not done yet. -- John T. -- John

Sean Peisert wrote: > John, > > I may be missing something here, but if I the compilation docs, I need > to build LLVM first and the C frontend second. But doing this, I > get: > > **llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ was not found, > > (obviously -- it wasn't installed, right?) You do need to build LLVM first before building llvm-gcc. This may seem a bit weird, but

Hi, It looks like the CVS server is still not available. When I try to update with cvs, I get: cvs [update aborted]: connect to llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu(128.174.245.58):2401 failed: Connection refused I know the server was down earlier this week but according to the message below, its supposted to be restored by now. Could someone please help? Thanks, Reid. On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 14:30, John T.

Dear All, Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed below. Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few days ago have been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all who've helped fix things. We would like to try to get as many of these fixed as possible before I create the release branch (still scheduled for tomorrow, Friday). I'll

Hi , Hope you are doing good. I am Madhavan from India . I was trying to implement the wonderful rsync concept in my project for file mirroring. I implemented the functunality but the only problem I am facing is in the * exclude* directory option. Though I am trying to exclude the directory by giving proper syntex for exclude but I find once the whole rsync is completed the directory still gets

Cyrille Mescam wrote: > Morning, > > I would like to know if you received my mail with the assembly code > you wanted. > > It not, i'll send it again to you. > > Thanks for your help. > > Regards. > > Cyrille > I've looked into the files you sent me, and it seems that the problem is occuring due to the C library simplication pass (which is run

Alexander Friedman wrote: > On May 17, John Criswell wrote: > >>Dear All, >> >>I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing >> the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. >> >>I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't >>have in house. I'm

Ricardo wrote: > Hello, > > Is PA working on the macintosh already? Although we may not have run it on MacOS X recently, I believe that it should work. We've run it on several architectures and operating systems, including SparcV9/Solaris. If you find that PA doesn't compile or work on MacOS X, please file a bug report (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/) so that we can fix it.

> If you have any more problems with this, please let me know! cvsweb content seems to be out-of-date: http://llvm.x10sys.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/llvm/projects/ (the link to cvsweb is taken from llvm.org) -- Valery

Chris Morgan wrote: > Any reason not to upgrade to subversion? It does a much better job > with handling moved or renamed files although svn doesn't actually > store a 'move' or a 'rename' as a single versioned operation. We discussed moving to another revision control system about a year ago, if I recall correctly. At that time, we decided not to move to another

I wrote: > If you look at the 3 lines above the assert that is failing, you'll see > this: > // FIXME: This code should handle a couple of common cases efficiently, but > // it should also implement the general case by code-gening a new anonymous > // nullary function to call. > Basically it's saying that we only support one argument functions that > take

Ricardo wrote: > Hi, > > I have been looking into the code that generates the LLVM assembly in the LLVM front end, but I am > not very sure if at the time that the llvm_c_expand_body_1 function is called, the SSA form was > already constructed (each definition dominates all the uses). Can somebody please tell me? The LLVM GCC frontend does not translate variables directly into

Thanks for the explanation. It's more clear now The only thing that seems strange is that in the function llvm_expand_shortcircuit_truth_expr in the front end, there is the creation of a PHI instruction. If there is no SSA yet, why do you do that? Thanks in advance --- John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Ricardo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been