similar to: [LLVMdev] ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function)

Hi again Does cygwin support shared libraries. And if not, how did you port llvm on this issue? /Henrik >From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:41:53 +0200 > >Hi, > >I get this error: >------------------ >ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >ToolRunner.cpp:396:

Hi John, Please see below, too >From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:57:02 -0500 > >Henrik Bach wrote: >>Hi, > >Please see below. > >> >>I get this error: >>------------------ >>ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >>ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: (Each

Dear all, I have been trying to build R-2.5.1 on the Interix-6.0 Unix subsystem that ships with Vista and everything looks fine during the configure except towards the end when "sed" throws an error: sed: 1: ""s/\*/\\\*/g"": invalid command code " A few lines later I then get: ./configure: : bad substitution So I guess sed is trying to do something and

Hi Reid, I downloaded the latest source code and ran configure (I suppose it was that you did mean). The result is: --------------- checking build system type... i586-pc-interix3 --------------- Otherwise, please correct me. /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

Hi Guys I'm trying to port and build the GCC Front End to the Interix environment. I've succeded until the xgcc program executes: /usr/local/src/cfrontend/build/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/src/cfrontend/build/gcc/ -B/usr/local/src/cfrontend/install//i586-pc-interix3/bin/ -B/usr/local/src/cfrontend/install//i586-pc-interix3/lib/ -isystem

Hi > >Are you able to explain below meaning to me? > >#if defined(_ALL_SOURCE) \ > || (defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED==1)) \ > || (__STDC__ - 0 == 0 && !defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE)) >extern char* __cdecl strdup(const char *); >#endif /* defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED == 1) */ > (RTFM) Some of the above

Hi, I get below error: --------------------------------- In file included from /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/Path.cpp:23, from /usr/local/src/llvm/lib/System/Path.cpp:27: /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/../Unix/Path.cpp: In member function `bool llvm::sys::Path::create_directory(bool)': /usr/local/build/llvm/lib/System/platform/../Unix/Path.cpp:343:

Hi Guys I'm trying to port and build LLVM to the Interix environment. I've succeded until the Interix version of gcc program executes: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' Compiling CommandLine.cpp CommandLine.cpp: In function

Hi Guys I'm trying to port and build LLVM to the Interix environment. I've succeded until the Interix version of gcc program executes: Before the patch: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/Support' Compiling CommandLine.cpp

On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Chris wrote: > >That should work fine. I'm not familiar at all with internix, but it >appears to have a buggy header or something. From what I understand, >internix is a posix layer for windows. Have you tried compiling under >cygwin? No, not yet. >If you grab the latest CVS sources, they should work fine with >cygwin, and will probably work

Hi All, I'm using LLVM/Clang 3.1 release. I first compiled llvm/clang using GCC per the instructions on the web with cmake. I then compiled libc++ per the instructions on the web. I then tried to compile llvm/clang with previously compiled clang and libc++ using "-std=c++0x -stdlib=libc++" flags. But the compilation fails at: > [ 58%] Building CXX object

I'm forwarding this bug resolution because it has a pretty wide impact on LLVM developers. This bug (451) has been resolved (well, works for me anyway). If you have reconfigured your build tree since October 4th, you need to reconfigure again. The bug produced shared objects that don't have a .so extension. Reconfiguring will fix this problem. The notes below show what was needed to

>From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0500 (CDT) > >There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments >protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef >to include internix. > Sorry Chris, but my DataTypes.h.in seems to be outdated (due to I'm porting LLVM 1.2), so I'm not

On 2012-06-26 04:22, Ashok Nalkund wrote: ... >> /local/mnt/workspace/ashoknn/519_libcxx_transition/llvm/src/tools/bugpoint/ToolRunner.cpp:131:12: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('llvm::raw_ostream' and 'std::ostringstream' >> (aka 'basic_ostringstream<char>')) >> errs() << OS; >> ~~~~~~ ^ ~~ > Hi Ashok,

Hi By manipulating a #define for G++ I've managed to compile int64_t type with ostream. Now, I'm stopped by some to me unknown constants: ----------------------------------- Compiling Constants.cpp Constants.cpp: In static member function `static bool llvm::ConstantSInt::isValueValidForType(const llvm::Type*, long long int)': Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared

Hi openssh developers, I'm trying to port openssh to Interix. See [1] for more on this. For Interix sshd needs to be patched to not use setuid()/setgid(), but an Interix specific function setuser(). See [2] why it is needed. Unfortunately, setuser() needs the clear-text password of the user to be fully functional (If you use password-less setuser(), then the user doesn't have network

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1113 Summary: Add Interix authentication support Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: tv at

Hi When I run configure on Interix, I get these four error messages: ----------- ./configure[384]: test: Files/Microsoft: unexpected operator/operand ./configure[384]: test: Files/Microsoft: unexpected operator/operand ./configure[384]: test: Files/Microsoft: unexpected operator/operand ./configure[384]: test: Files/Microsoft: unexpected operator/operand checking for a BSD-compatible install...

>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:26:09 -0700 > >Okay, so the question is, how do you do the equivalent of a MAP_ANON >allocation on Interix. We don't want to map a file here. We're just asking >for virtual memory (unbacked by swap or file) to be allocated to the >process. Is there a way to do that on Interix? The

Yes, It looks like the PATH variable in the configure script at line 384 isn't getting quoted properly. The "Files/Microsoft" is probably part of "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\...". The spaces cause it to be interpreted as separate words so it fails. I don't have time to look at this in detail right now. Have a look at the configure script and see if you can figure