similar to: [LLVMdev] UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest.c

Vladimir Prus wrote: > The above-mentioned test contains this: > > long B53 = - (1LL << 53); > > strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about > shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or greater than ... the > width of the promoted left operand, the behaviour is underfined". Forget this, I've missed the 'LL'

Vladimir Prus wrote: > Vladimir Prus wrote: > > The above-mentioned test contains this: > > > > long B53 = - (1LL << 53); > > > > strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about > > shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or greater than ... the > > width of the promoted left operand, the behaviour is

On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 07:07, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > The above-mentioned test contains this: > > > > > > long B53 = - (1LL << 53); > > > > > > strictly speaking, this is not correct code. The C standard says about > > > shift: "if the value of the first operator is ... or

Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > > But the test still has a problem ;-) > > > > printf("%ld\n", Arg / (1LL << 4)); > > > > Again, the passed value is long long, and format specifier is '%ld'. What > > about the attached patch? > > I think testL has another problem. It takes a long argument which in C I > think is a 4-byte int,

Hi. After a small war with "underfined sybol" error and conflicts between h323 and oh323 I successfully install h323 channel. Now, I can connect from Netmeeting to SIP and ZAP channels, but I can't here anything. When I call at phone, and try to speak, on another end of line man said, that my voice very low. Microphone volume is maximum... Is there some parameters like rxgain,

Hi R users, I have a couple of questions about some problems that I am facing with regard to numerical integration and optimization of likelihood functions. Let me provide a little background information: I am trying to do maximum likelihood estimation of an econometric model that I have developed recently. I estimate the parameters of the model using the monthly US unemployment rate series

Hola de nuevo, Esta es la información de mi sesion: R version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14) i386-pc-mingw32 locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=Spanish_Spain.1252 LC_CTYPE=Spanish_Spain.1252 [3] LC_MONETARY=Spanish_Spain.1252 LC_NUMERIC=C [5] LC_TIME=Spanish_Spain.1252 attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base Lo que yo prentendo es

I think test/Programs/SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-CastToBool.c has a problem. Consider: void testLong(long long X) { printf("%ld ", X); testBool(X != 0); } This passes 'long long' value to 'ld' format specifier -- but for that specifier the parameter should be 'long'. So, the behaviour of the above is undefined and in fact it

Reid Spencer wrote: > This program is in error. Either the format specifier needs to be %lld > or the argument value X needs to be casted to type long. This will > compile fine but it probably won't work at runtime because printf is > expecting a long, not a long long. I think your backend producing "wrong > results" is actually correct :) Yea, that's what

Hi, I am trying to use swfdec to watch youtube video. As an example, I want to watch this video from this page: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot5DtISEceU >From the source of the above page, it has this link: var fo = new SWFObject("/player2.swf?video_id=ot5DtISEceU&l=227&t=OEgsToPDskIAT_WivMUj76nGfdhAFBKN&sk=CdlGIc1WbGevkdd3KWQVRQC", "movie_player",

we are trying to adapt the configure in order to work with latest gcc3.3 (from apple) and g77 3.4 (from http://gravity.psu.edu/~khanna/hpc.html ) At the moment there is no need to define the __DEBUGGING__ but there is still a problem with the -lcc_dynamic does any of you know how to check for this library and explain why we see -lcc_dynamic often passed as an ld flag. Where to find doc on

Volodya, This program is in error. Either the format specifier needs to be %lld or the argument value X needs to be casted to type long. This will compile fine but it probably won't work at runtime because printf is expecting a long, not a long long. I think your backend producing "wrong results" is actually correct :) Most modern C/C++ compilers will detect this for you at

At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not

Hi! When I go to http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/doxygen/annotated.html and click on link for, say, "llvm::Module", I've told that the target page does not exist. Same happens for llvm::Value, and in fact everything under "llvm" namespace. Any idea what's wrong? - Volodya

Hello, I'm playing with alias analysis, using the following program: %i = external global int ; <int*> [#uses=2] implementation ; Functions: int %_Z3bari(int %p) { entry: %tmp.0 = load int* %i ; <int> [#uses=1] %tmp.1 = setgt int %tmp.0, 10 ; <bool> [#uses=1] br bool %tmp.1, label %then, label %UnifiedReturnBlock then:

On my target, the multiplication can involve all general purpose registers, but there's are still some restrictions: the first and the second operand as well as the result must be in different registers, and neither register can be gr7. How can I enforce this restriction on the register allocator? - Volodya

From: metafoo at gmail.com [mailto:metafoo at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Richard Smith Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:51 PM To: Villmow, Micah Cc: Ouriel, Boaz; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] SPIR Portability Discussion On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com<mailto:Micah.Villmow at amd.com>> wrote: From:

On Monday 25 April 2005 14:43, Vladimir Prus wrote: > The 'i' variable is never modified in the program, however, all analyses > except for -globalsmodref-aa report that the > > %tmp.3 = call int %_Z3bari( int %p ) ; <int> [#uses=1] > > instruction can modify 'i'. I'm somewhat surprised, because it looks like > -globalsmodref-aa is the simplest

Manuel, After the discussion at last night, I have agreed that GetTemporaryDirectory() on Win32 would do bad thing, thank you. dir = GetTemporaryDirectory(); dir.eraseFromDisk(erase_contents = true); dir = GetTemporaryDirectory(); /* It doesn't create anything on Win32 due to caching */ I suppose Manuel wants GetTemporaryDirectory() to keep semantics similar mkdtemp(3). Though it is in

Hello, I've just tries make && make install on a fresh CVS tree, and get: llvm[0]: Installing include files /bin/sh: line 1: pax: command not found Two questions. 1. Why install process requires some nonstandard tool? Is it possible to get away without it. 2. autoconf/configure.ac has this: AC_PATH_PROG(PAX, [pax], [pax]) but Makefile.rules uses plain 'pax',