similar to: [LLVMdev] Visual C++ Toolkit

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, will

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > is horribly lacking). The

Hi, Have you tried the new VC8 Beta? It's been out for less than 2 weeks: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx It's supposed to have improved standards compliance. Regards, -Eugene Talagrand On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:56:03 -0500 (CDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Reply-To: llvmdev at

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > > is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, > > will handle it though with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the > > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > > though,

I just found this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ I don''t tend to pay much attention to Microsoft and MS Windows, so perhaps everyone else already knew about it. Basically, they have released a command-line-only version of their C++ compiler and libraries for free (gratis) downloading. I assume this version would be able to compile wxRuby, but would be

Hi all, Quick question: What is the best way to have multiple return values from a function? Would that be placing these into a structure and returning that to the caller? Thanks. -bw -- || "If wishes and buts were clusters of nuts, we'd all have a bowl of || granola!" - Mr. Jellineck

Chris Lattner wrote: } > I tend to agree. I'm a strong advocate of XML myself (on other } > projects). However, introducing XML would make LLVM dependent on some } > kind of XML parser. We could probably get away with expat (small, fast) } > for our purposes in LLVM, but there is still the issue of dependency. To } } To me, it's not a matter of "one more

Henrik Bach wrote: } Hi John, } } configure still exits, when checking for uint64_t. I've attached a patch, } that properly will fix it. Either uint64_t or u_int64_t will succeed: } } Index: configure.ac } =================================================================== } RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/autoconf/configure.ac,v } retrieving revision 1.106 } diff -u -r1.106 configure.ac } ---

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Bill, > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 21:31, Bill Wendling wrote: > > Hi Reid, > > > > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > >

Hi John, configure still exits, when checking for uint64_t. I've attached a patch, that properly will fix it. Either uint64_t or u_int64_t will succeed: Index: configure.ac =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/autoconf/configure.ac,v retrieving revision 1.106 diff -u -r1.106 configure.ac --- configure.ac 2 Sep 2004 18:44:44 -0000

LLVM Developers, We've added a page to the main web site that provides links to each LLVM Developer's home page and/or personal LLVM Notes page. You can find it here: http://llvm.org/Developers.html or just click the link titled "LLVM People" on the left of the main page. The list isn't complete but contains pictures and links for everyone that responded in IRC this morning

Hi all, I had a quick question. I think it's possible to do this, but just wanted to make sure. It is possible to extend LLVM to add, say, matrix operations at a higher level and then "lower" them into some version of LLVM "proper" after performing any transformations on them, right? Also, it's possible to have any custom-made types (like "matrix") as well?

Hi Reid, > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > 1. Name = llvmcc I like llvmcc, but really have no strong opinion. > 2. The config file format will resemble Microsoft .ini files > (name=value in

> GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the > declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). > > So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of > abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). > > Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always > complained

GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the declaration of abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is merely buggier. VC++ has always complained about functions failing to return a

Hello, is there any documentation for LLVM codebase other than produced by doxygen? The reason I'm asking is that doxygen docs are (1) not very complete at the moment, as lot of classes don't even have a description (2) is generally not the best way to get high-level view of a big codebase. As an example, consider this code: %tmp.1 = setgt int %i, 0 br bool %tmp.1, label

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:51:08 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of >

On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:04 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I cannot find any specific instructions for uninstalling the VC++ 2005 > Express Edition. There is this README file: > http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/readme/default.aspx. As > it isn't the full Visual Studio it probably isn't messing around with > Windows system files. > > I do know for a fact that the

Hi all, I get this warning during compilation: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/wendling/llvm/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT' Compiling Emitter.cpp Emitter.cpp:44:1: warning: "_POSIX_MAPPED_FILES" redefined In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:171, from /usr/include/c++/3.3.1/i586-mandrake-linux-gnu/bits/gthr-default.h:38, from

On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of > course, it is required that you uninstall the beta before installing a > newer beta or the release version. Urrggg! I