similar to: [LLVMdev] AsmWriter.cpp:255: error: ambiguous overload for `std::basic_ostream<char,...

No, Chris, I'm not buying that argument, due to I've tweaked /usr/include/types.h a little bit, so the configuration and compilation of the cfrontend would be correct: /* * 64bit type for BSD compatability */ #ifdef __GNUC__ typedef long long int quad_t; typedef unsigned long long int u_quad_t; typedef long long int int64_t; typedef unsigned long long int u_int64_t;

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > This tweak seems to work. > > As far as I can see, correct me if I'm wrong, it is the compiler, that can't > figure out which std::basic_ostream to use. Why? What I'm saying is that it appears that your implementation of operator<< is not functional or is missing. You said that you are using GCC on internix. Is it possible

Yes, Chris you're right. It seems that my << operator for int64_t is missing in my '/opt/gcc.3.3/include/c++/3.3/bits/ostream.tcc' file. Which ordinary version of GCC are you working with and how do your definition of the << operator for int64_t look like? /Henrik > >Here is an excerpt from the config.log for LLVM: > >configure:19451: checking for int64_t

Here is an excerpt from the config.log: configure:19451: checking for int64_t configure:19476: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:19479: $? = 0 configure:19482: test -s conftest.o configure:19485: $? = 0 configure:19496: result: yes configure:19511: checking for uint64_t configure:19536: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:19539: $? = 0 configure:19542: test -s conftest.o

Report by Eric Lindblad 28-08-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com As of Windows 8.1 MS has discontinued enabling for Interix, so perhaps there is little or no interest in this e-mail's subject matter. NB: As far as possible languages for xapian-bindings I only have be able to compile earlier versions of Tcl with a static library on Interix 3.5, Perl versions fail 'make check',

Question by Eric Lindblad 05-09-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com I would enquire if anyone has an opinion on whether it might be a possibility that adding the following #ifdef in certain xapian-core-1.2.21 /common and/or /backends files following the string #include <sys/types.h> might move closer towards resolution the 'ambiguous overload' issue. +#ifdef __INTERIX +#

> >It appears that your libstdc++ does not support insertion of 64-bit >integers into iostreams. Did I mention that you should try cygwin? ;-) > >-Chris > Hmmmm :-) /Henrik _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://www.msn.dk/messenger

Hi Scott, > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > > this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler. However so many > > compilers miscompiled this that a workaround was committed to svn. So you > > may want to check out llvm and llvm-gcc from svn. Alternatively, maybe > > the patch applies to llvm 2.5 too.

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler.  However so many > compilers miscompiled this that a workaround was committed to svn.  So you > may want to check out llvm and llvm-gcc from svn.  Alternatively, maybe > the patch applies to llvm 2.5 too.  I've attached it. I will try the

Thanks for the suggestion, Andre. I downloaded GNAT GPL 2007, and followed the directions on your web page. Now I get a lot of C++ errors. In fact, the output I captured to a log file is over six megabytes just from the start of the problem command to the termination of the make. I'm obviously not going to include it all here, but the command and the first few errors are copied below.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value > >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if > >> that's erroneously false. > > This works for me: > > Index: Makefile.rules >

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value >> >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if >> >> that's

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Scott, > >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> > this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler.  However so many >> > compilers miscompiled this that a workaround was committed to svn.  So you >> > may want to check

On 31.05.2011 19:45, Devang Patel wrote: > > On May 31, 2011, at 10:36 AM, trash-stuff at gmx.de > <mailto:trash-stuff at gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 31.05.2011 19:22, Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On May 30, 2011, at 11:11 AM,trash-stuff at gmx.de >>> <mailto:trash-stuff at gmx.de>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>

here are the cpp file: $ cat -n eh1.catch.cpp 1 #include <iostream> 2 3 int main() 4 { 5 try { 6 throw 78; 7 } 8 catch (int){ 9 10 std::cout << "at catch\n"; 11 12 } 13 } LLVM-IR: $ llvm-g++ -S -emit-llvm eh1.catch.cpp -o eh1.catch.ll ... 46 define i32 @main() {

Hi there, I am a student considering a compiler design based dissertation with llvm. I am having problems building llvm on OpenBSD-current. I hope to make a port of llvm for OpenBSD once I have figured out how to build it. Observe: llvm[3]: Compiling Deserialize.cpp for Release build In file included from /home/edd/llvm/llvm-2.3/include/llvm/Bitcode/BitstreamRead er.h:18, from

Hello xapian users, The server I'm compiling on is a little odd. SunOS on a sun4 architecture. Fails when linking, gives the following, memcpy 0x10 /usr/local/gcc-3.3.2/lib/./libstdc++.a(ctype.o) ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error:

hi, I try to build hello.cpp using both llvmg++ and GNU g++, the generate llvm bytecode's size is about 960K, and the size of binary code generated by g++ is only 13K. Could anyone explain the difference between the two result? BWT: I rebuild the cfrontend in RH linux9.0, but when I build the hello.cpp the llvmG++ reports warnings too, it shows: ----------------------------- [yue at RH9

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > After converting a piece of C++ code to C one of the functions that are > generated is this: > _ZStlsISt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIcT_ES5_PKc This is defined in the C++ standard library. You can get the demangled name like so: $ c++filt _ZStlsISt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIcT_ES5_PKc std::basic_ostream<char,

Hi! I'm trying to compile llvm 2.2 with gcc 4.3.0 on FC8. My compile is failing with the following error(s): error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >' If you've run into this, how did you get around this issue? thx in advance! -Bernardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...