similar to: [LLVMdev] Add assert in llvm::StroreInst::init and llvm::LoadInst::init

On 5/23/2019 6:25 PM, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > hi James, > >> @dc1:~# samba-tool dns serverinfo dc1.domain.local -U administrator >> Password for [DOMAIN\administrator]: >>   dwVersion                   : 0xece0205 >>   fBootMethod                 : DNS_BOOT_METHOD_DIRECTORY >>   fAdminConfigured            : FALSE >>   fAllowUpdate                :

Dear all, I've been diving a bit deeper into this per request of Tomas Kalibra, and found the following : - the lock on the file is only after trying to read it using oligo, so that's not a R problem in itself. The problem is independent of extrenal packages. - using Windows' fc utility and cygwin's cmp utility I found out that every so often the download.file() function inserts

hi, it would be extremely useful for me if someone with knowledge of how the current tools and drivers use Xenstore would be kind enough to update the Wiki with current information. I have been spending quite a lot of time trying to get my domU connected to a block device in dom0 using a home-brewed domain creation tool, and I am still at the ''Timeout connecting to device!''

Hi, I would like to get the '5'. I would like to know where the loaded value is stored. I don't know which method I should use of the LoadInst class. Hope this clarifies Thanks On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 20:37 Doerfert, Johannes Rudolf <jdoerfert at anl.gov wrote: > The LoadInst is %5. I'm not sure what you mean by reference though. > > On 12/12, Alberto Barbaro via

I'm just diving into LLVM. What does it mean when LoadInst::getAlignment() returns 0? Unknown alignment, use default alignment of the type for the load, something else? In particular, clang appears to set to 0 the alignment of the load instruction that results from accessing the lvalue returned by a call. Is this the intended behavior? For example: const double &foo(void *p); double

Hi all, I put a case into llvm and got the following .ll code: ... %r1419_0_0_0_i376 = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] ... %tmp1476_i = lshr i32 %tmp1226_i, 24 ; <i32> [#uses=1] store i32 %tmp1476_i, i32* %r1419_0_0_0_i376, align 4 %tmp1505_i = volatile load i32* %r1419_0_0_0_i376, align 4 ; <i32> [#uses=1] %tmp1542_i = getelementptr [256 x i8]* @Te, i32 0, i32 %tmp1505_i ...

The compilation error is : `error: ‘LD100’ was not declared in this scope.` On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < alexandruionutdiaconescu at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Can you please tell me if it is possible in LLVM to cast a `Value*` to an > `Instruction*/LoadInst*` if for example `isa<LoadInst>(MyValue)` is true? > In my

Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Can you please tell me if it is possible in LLVM to cast a `Value*` to > an `Instruction*/LoadInst*` if for example `isa<LoadInst>(MyValue)` is > true? http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-isa-cast-and-dyn-cast-templates In my particular piece of code: > > Value* V1 =

Hi Alexandru, > The compilation error is : `error: ‘LD100’ was not declared in this scope.` > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Alexandru Ionut Diaconescu < > alexandruionutdiaconescu at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> Can you please tell me if it is possible in LLVM to cast a `Value*` to an >> `Instruction*/LoadInst*` if for example

Thanks Sean. It clarified my query. Do you have an answer to my other question (in a different mail-chain) listed below Is there a simple way to check if a given instruction operand (represented by Value *) is a virtual register or otherwise? Context: I am creating a ModulePass for pointer Analysis. BR/Nizam From: "Sean Silva" <chisophugis at gmail.com> To: nizam

Hi, I am trying to figure out the best way to add some extra metadata to the store and load llvm-ir instructions: The metadata content is a 'Value*' expression representing a side channel, containing dependency information that is used to help the Scoped Alias Analysis. Optimizations that don't know about this side channel can safely drop it, where the only effect would be on the

Folks, I have a LLVM instruction like the following %0 = load i32** %pp, align 8 I have a LoadInst &inst handle to this instruction. In addition, i could access the pointer being loaded from using the inst.getPointerOperand... However, is there a way to access the handle to the value being loaded? Essentially, i wanted to access the %0 in the statement listed. The end goal is

Thanks Joshua and Michael, Just to to clarify, I'm experimenting with the Interpreter class and observing the instructions that are executed by it. Just for becoming more confident with LLVM in general I'd like for each instruction to access to the various parts of it. In this instance I would like to access to the %Name that is shown in the textual representation. When I call

Hi Tim, Assume a store instruction. Store has 2 Operands. I can use the store->getOperand(0) and store->getOperand(1) methods to access these operands in form of Value *. Very likely that the operands are stack variables or formal variables or global variables. It is also possible that these operands are LLVM virtual-registers. Is there a way to determine if a given operand is a

Hi all, I have %5 = load i32, i32* %3, align 4 LoadInst and I would like to get reference to the destination ( in this case %5 ). How can I do that? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181212/1d0bd00c/attachment.html>

Hi, Thanks, John, I just forgot the multi-thread issue. I'll write my own pass to handle this as for my project, it is just single-thread case. Sheng. Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 09:30:45 -0500 > From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Eliminate Store-Load pair even the LoadInst is > volatile > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Hello everyone, Can you please tell me if it is possible in LLVM to cast a `Value*` to an `Instruction*/LoadInst*` if for example `isa<LoadInst>(MyValue)` is true? In my particular piece of code: Value* V1 = icmpInstrArray[i]->getOperand(0); Value* V2 = icmpInstrArray[i]->getOperand(1); if (isa<LoadInst>(V1) || isa<LoadInst>(V2)){ ...

We're running v3.2.3 and we have a failing piece of hardware that runs a brick (brick A). I have another brick (Brick B) in the volume that has some data on it, but has enough spare room for the data that's on brick A. If I run replace-brick like: gluster volume replace-brick myvolume server1:/brick-a server2:brick-b start - would the data currently on brick B be wipeed? - would any new

Hello,      I'm using the internal DNS server and when running the command 'samba-tool dns serverinfo dc1 -U administrator' I get the following output. @dc1:~# samba-tool dns serverinfo dc1.domain.local -U administrator Password for [DOMAIN\administrator]:   dwVersion                   : 0xece0205   fBootMethod                 : DNS_BOOT_METHOD_DIRECTORY  

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 20:53, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of > > autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like > > install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the > > projects rather than making the makefiles