similar to: [LLVMdev] etags change

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > (just for fun) I've tried to compile LLVM under cygwin. > With "make -k" I got only: Cool. We don't rountinely use this configuration, so there may be a bit of leg work you'll have to do... :) But that said, we would love to get LLVM working cleanly on it! > ----------------- > DynamicLinker.cpp: In function

Hi, I wonder whether there is any good way to build etags table for LLVM src. Thanks, Gang-Ryung Uh, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110725/632ec1f0/attachment.html>

I'm looking to clarify this entry I found in a changelog(line 2062ish) on a CentOS 5 box for Apache 2.2.3 *) mod_include no longer allows an ETag header on 304 responses. PR 19355. [Geoffrey Young <geoff apache.org>, Andr? Malo] Loading the mod_include module prevents any ETags headers from being sent from the box. If I comment out mod_include, ETags are sent as expected.

Please read this if you're working out of LLVM CVS: I just checked in a change to the makefiles to stop using -fshort-enum when building LLVM. This flag enables a trivial optimization, but causes the code generated by the G++ compiler to not match the standard C++ ABI. Because of this, the presence of the flag makes it more difficult to link LLVM libraries to external source bases, and it

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Yueqiang wrote: > hi, > > like in C/C++ language there are time/date and istream::sync function. If an operation can be written in C/C++ or some other high-level language, then it should be. It can be directly compiled to LLVM bytecode. In our case you can llvm-dis llvm-gcc/lib/libstdc++.so to see what we compile it into. > also in RISC system Data/Inst Cache

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > i'd like to know what progress you guys have made (not on cvs?). Everything is in CVS. Noone is currently working on automating the pattern matching generator process yet. Before doing that, there are a few changes we want to make to the SelectionDAG interface. In particular, right now, the selection process basically works like this: #1.

the proposed architecture (chris) doesn't seem to attack the phase ordering problem. through having independent instruction selection, instruction scheduling, and register allocation phases faciliate a modular design, but i believe the phase-coupled code generator generator high quality code on many architectures. espeically in the embedded system like a media/dsp processors with very limited

How does Rails generate ETags by default? I''ve got config.action_controller. perform_caching set to true in production so that I can use page-level caching in a few specific places, but it seems that Rails is automatically setting ETags on *all* responses even though I''m not using fresh_when or the stale? helpers in any of my actions. How is Rails deciding to do this and how

On 4/30/13 1:10 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >> On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >>> developer, >>> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm

# HG changeset patch # User agriffis@vino.americas.hpqcorp.net # Date 1158803249 14400 # Node ID 010ae57673c7103737b84044eaa57a43347a0f0e # Parent 596b0e4fbef4069bfb3ee9807f2ccfdd65052c46 Clean up and enhance "make tags" - delete correct file in _tags rule - don''t prune nonexistent files/dirs - call exuberant-ctags with additional flags from Linux: -I to ignore some

I don't know if others would be interested as well, but I should be able to set it up at least on one of my machines over the summer, and on a continuing basis if its found useful. Should be at least useful to me with the work I'll be doing on LLVM over the summer. (NB: a speedy x86-64 linux box currently) -Chandler On 5/6/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > >

Add cscope support to xen Makefile. While at it, refactor a bit so etags, ctags, and cscope use same method to generate file list. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> --- xen/Makefile | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) ===== xen/Makefile 1.78 vs edited ===== --- 1.78/xen/Makefile 2005-03-28 13:51:31 -08:00 +++ edited/xen/Makefile

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Mike Hearn wrote: > To be able to deal with the case of passing long/size_t into functions, > shouldn't there be a first class type that has indeterminate width decided > only at native code generation time? Adding something like this would certainly be possible, but I'm not sure it's really appropriate. The problem is that 'long' varies in

I'd definitely be interested in seeing this happen. If you get it working, I might be able to contribute a build slave as well. --Owen On May 6, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > I don't know if others would be interested as well, but I should be > able to set it up at least on one of my machines over the summer, > and on a continuing basis if its found

i'd like to know what progress you guys have made (not on cvs?). i don't want to re-invent wheels, and the existing many code generator generators. i am evaluating many possbile code generation libraries. at present i give me preferrence to "Prop": http://www.cs.nyu.edu/leunga/www/prop.html and it's portable too. are there any other good library you could recommend?

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote: > This certainly doesn't occur in gcc mainline. > In fact, I improved the error message, and added a error test to gcc > just yesterday. Yep, clang reports: t.c:4:12: error: read-only variable is not assignable arr[0] = 1; ~~~~~~ ^ 1 diagnostic generated. so this is specific to llvm-gcc somehow. -Chris > On 8/9/07, Chris

Yup, You are right. That exploded. I missed some lines in between. there was a .reserve(total) in the actual code. But, there is some side effect I still could not find. 2007/8/16, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Emílio Wuerges wrote: > > -- > > int total = BB->size(); > > std::vector<MachineInstr*>

Yes, sorry for not mentioning it. I added that header also Although I suppose that if I am not using Sparc there will be no problem (it's an Itanium 2 machine) Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > I commented this line and it is compiling now: > > > > extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); > >

I didn't 'cause my llvm-gcc just seems to be 4.0: ]$ llvm-gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../llvm-gcc4-1.9.source/configure --prefix=/mounts/zion/disks/0/localhome/tbrethou/llvm-gcc4/obj/../install --enable-llvm=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-threads Thread model: single gcc version 4.0.1 LLVM (Apple Computer, Inc. build

I commented this line and it is compiling now: extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); I hope that will not cause a different kind of problem. What it is zalloc used for? Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > It seems that this happened before but I do not know the details: > >