similar to: [LLVMdev] Getelementptr woes

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I'm having problems with the following LLVM instruction > > %tmp.0.i = call int (sbyte*, ...)* > %printf( sbyte* getelementptr ([11 x sbyte]* %.str_1, long 0, ...... > > The first argument in function call, > > sbyte* getelementptr ([11 x sbyte]* %.str_1..... > > appears to be ConstantExpression*, and my

Chris Lattner wrote: > > So I wonder if I can away by writing two passes which work on LLVM level. > > The first pass would extract all ConstantExpr* operands from instructions > > and move them into separate instructions. E.g. the example above would > > become: > > > > %tmp.1 = sbyte* getelementptr ([11 x sbyte]* %.str_1, .......... > > %tmp.0.i =

Ok, I got home so I have more details. Here's the sample C program: ----------------- C program --------------- #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("hello world\n"); return 0; } ------------- end C program ------------- This is compiled using llvm online demo into the following llvm code (target removed): ----------------- LLVM code -------------- deplibs

Vyacheslav, I've tracked down the change and I have a fix for you to test. The attached patch should be applied to the CVS head (version 1.132) of X86AsmPrinter.cpp in llvm/lib/Target/X86. The patch just includes MINGW targets in the same set of choices that it makes for Cygwin. Could you please try the patch and let me know if it solves your problem? If it does, I'll commit the patch.

Hi, Is there a way to modify the string such as char a or char b? Could I use the way like "Replace an instruction with another Value" in Programm Manual? In fact, what I am interested in is string with visible expression, not all string, and I am trying to hide the orignal string by using simple way like XOR.. Is there a way to reorder the basic blocks? Thanks. Qiuyu C Source

Vyacheslav, This is the same problem that I had with Cygwin .. nearly identical. The issue was documented in PR492 if you want some background. I'm currently trying to dig up what I did to fix this in December for Cygwin and see if I can apply the same change for mingw. Reid. On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:39, Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote: > Ok, I got home so I have more details. Here's the

In a code segment of my pass plugin, I try to gather AliasSets for all StoreInst, LoadInst and CallInst instructions in a function. Some behaviors of the pass puzzled me. Below is the *.ll of the test program which I run the pass on, it was get with "llvm-gcc -Wl,--disable-opt" from a rather simple *.c program. ---------------------------------- ; ModuleID = 'ptralias.bc'

hi, I want to know what is exact meaning in the following code. target endian-- %struct..TorRec-- %struct.TorRec-- implementation-- ;<sbyte>[#uses=1/0]-- how to explain them in details? Does anyone give me a guide? thanks yueqiang -------------------------------------------------------------- target endian = little target pointersize = 32 %struct..TorRec = type { int, void ()* }

Reid, This patch won't work for me. I compile llvm toolset with MSVC Express (hence __MINGW32__ won't be defined for me at compile time). I only try to feed the generated assembly into gcc (pretty much gnu assembler, I suppose). I don't use mingw tools at the earlier stage. However it's obvious for me how to modify the code now (just add MSVC at that line), thanks! I'll try it

Oh, I appologize that I should not have asked about __main() ---- it appears in FAQ. But the question remains that why call to __main() can alias stack location? I think the memory location pointed by data_X pointers are not visible to __main(). In comparison, calls to printf() do not have similar effect. On 5/14/06, Nai Xia <nelson.xia at gmail.com> wrote: > > In a code segment of

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 08:58, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > > I have trouble using the llvm tools.Some of the errors are : > > > > $ llvm-dis prog.bc > > $ llvm-dis: Invalid Top Level Block Length! Type:1, Size:456 (Vers=0, Pos=12) > > Can you explain how you generated this bytecode file? It looks corrupted > or

Ok, I just tried the patch with some modifications (added msvc target and used WIN32 instead of __MINGW32__ for preprocessor) and everything worked beautifully. Thanks for the help! On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:45:40 -0500, Vyacheslav Akhmechet <coffeemug at gmail.com> wrote: > Reid, > > This patch won't work for me. I compile llvm toolset with MSVC Express > (hence __MINGW32__

Hi Chris, I took a haste look at the "Points-to Analysis in Almost Linear Time" by Steens , your PHD thesis and SteensGaard.cpp in LLVM this afternoon. So I think: 1. Actually the basic algorithm described originally by SteensGaard does not provide MOD/REF information for functions. 2. The context insensitive part of Data Structure Analysis (LocalAnalysis) can be deemed as an

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 03:19, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > > > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > > external global variables( and so inComplete ), > > Sounds right! > > > the call to printf will > > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > > > Am I right ? :) >

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > Unfortunately, I did not locate the lines in steens-aa for "printf" special case. > In ds-aa, I found the lines below: Right, steens-aa and ds-aa share code for "local analysis", they just stitch it together into an interprocedural analysis in different ways. The code below is used for steens-aa. >

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > external global variables( and so inComplete ), Sounds right! > the call to printf will > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > Am I right ? :) If you've tested it then, yes you're right :). I haven't played with this stuff for a long time,

Chris Lattner wrote: > > And why isn't it possible to just make those functions known to LLVM? > > After all, *I think*, if this function is to be called, it should be > > declared in assembler, and so you have to pass some information abou > > those function to the code printer. (Of course, it's possible to just > > directly print the declarations, but

The -c option tells llvm-gcc to build a bytecode file without linking in the LLVM runtime library. This is similar to the -c option for regular gcc, which you use to build multiple separate .o files that you're going to link into a single executable. If you want to build from a single source file, it's easiest just to compile without the -c option. If you're building from

I successfully compiled CVS HEAD yesterday on my win32 machine using Visual C++ Express (2005). I also have Mingw tools installed. I wrote a simple hello world application and generated native assembly code using llvm. When I tried to feed the code into GCC, it rejected it with "junk at the end of line" error messages. Shouldn't GCC be able to assemble this code? I realize win32 port

Hello, When I compile a "hello.c" program with a printf in "main" and use llvm-gcc with a "-c" option: llvm-gcc -c t1.c -o t1.bc and then try to compile t1.bc to native using llc & gcc I get a call to "__main" which is undefined. If I don't use the "-c" option: llvm-gcc t1.c -o t1 I don't get a reference to