similar to: [LLVMdev] What about next monthly news release? :)

Hi all, web-browser access to cvs is of course nice, but is it possible to provide anonymous read-only access to llvm cvs? (it would be nice to have an ability just download last sources) P.S. BTW, this and previous my post were actually motivated by desire to find some simple example on JIT usage :) --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi all, compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with following output: ------- make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' ...skipped -------

Hi OpenC++ developers, IMHO, the LLVM project (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/) could give a second breath to OpenC++ project. Indeed, the implementations of reflection become quite restricted if the just-in-time (JIT) compiling is not available. Am i wrong? --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi all, Here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-October/000523.html Chris wrote: Chris> We certainly acknowledge that CVS has severe Chris> deficiencies, but in the near future we'll probably stay with it. Chris> Perhaps after SVN 1.0 comes out... :) so, now it is: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectNewsList ;-) P.S. any March LLVM news? best

Hi all there is a lot of changes/bugfixes as it was reported by Chris. Would it be possible to put new tarballs for last stable release? --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi devels, "install-instructionsSection" seems to be absent: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#install-instructions best regards, --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi devels, there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: 1. this document: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain examples on optimization step. 2. If i am not wrong there is no tool, which integrates all steps: llvmgcc->opt->llc into something like llcc (and

Hello again Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > All benefits, what one could obtain from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at single host", one might obtaine from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at multiple hosts". Isn't that logical? I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

Interesting email address there :) On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 01:18, =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Valery A.Khamenya=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= wrote: > For the very beginning think of a host with multiple CPUs. > I could formulate my proposal even for this non-networked > case. On the same machine, LLVM definitely needs to support both symmetric and asymmetric multi-processing. I believe some primitives to

> My $0.02 worth on this topic .. and again |0.02 of mein :-) > However, I find it unreasonable to expect LLVM to provide > any features in this area. In order to do anything meaningful, > LLVM would have to have some kind of awareness of networks > (typically an operating system concern). > That seems at odds with the "low level" principles of LLVM. When I

> > hm, sending bug report is not my favorite hobby :) > > Well if you don't, it might never get fixed :( OK-OK, let's save the world :) Well, I've made it. > It might be possible to hack your <cassert> header file or something > though... it is just a few places in three files as reported in my previous post. Then comes assert violation with message from

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

> > yesterday I got new SuSE 9.1 DVD, so i am going to enter this > > river again. Perhaps, this time all will be fine. > > Sounds great, please let me know how it goes. SuSE 9.1 is running OK. after 30 minute of compilation i get first errors: ********************* make[2]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/llvm/runtime/libtrace' make[2]: Entering directory

Building PowerPC.td register information header with tblgen Included from PowerPC.td:22: Parsing PowerPCInstrInfo.td:53: Variable not defined: 'GPRC'! make[3]: *** [PowerPCGenRegisterInfo.h.inc] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/ssrc/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC' maybe I just have to "make clean" and/or ./configure BTW, would it be nice to put Depend, Release and

Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language implementations? How good is LLVM for this? E.g., is it natural to expect that the LLVM-based implementation of the language Concurrent Clean be any faster than its reference implementation? Best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in comparison to GCC) on ackerman test on my AthlonXP. But here:

Hi Chris and all, > LLVM itself doesn't. The files that live in the llvm/runtime directory > are runtime libraries for the C/C++ front-end. If you're not using those > front-ends, then you don't need to build them. I see. Anyway, it would be nice to have a few words about building/installing llvm and cfrontend. I fail to find notes on this matter in README or INSTALL

Hi all, I think there is still too few docs/samples for those, who'd like to write JIT-based interpreters. Today, the real examples to learn from are rather: - lli.cpp - ModuleMaker.cpp - Stacker which is still unfortunatelly not that much about JITing :( Well, what I am going to sell: What about very small JIT-based example similar to ModuleMaker? I mean example, where, say, two

Hi all maybe it is of interest for someone: I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux (even on exotic x86-compatible CPU). Things seem to be running OK. This is a good prerequisite for making llvm ebuild script and promote llvm to hackers of fast-growing progressive Gentoo world. -- Valery A.Khamenya