similar to: [LLVMdev] An LLVM 1.3 Request

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > There is an outstanding bug, #257, pertaining to separating out the > detailed testing infrastructure from the main LLVM code. I would like to > see fixed in the 1.3 release time frame. The bug can be found here: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257 I think that we would all like to see this bug fixed for 1.3. :) That said,

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote: > Yes, definitely. I think the right way to do this is to make it be as > incremental as possible. In particular, the biggest benefit will be to > get llvm/test/Programs into a seperate tarball from the main LLVM tree, as > it is big and will (hopefully!) keep getting bigger. There are several > tasks that can be done

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > Yes, definitely. I think the right way to do this is to make it be as > > incremental as possible. In particular, the biggest benefit will be to > > get llvm/test/Programs into a seperate tarball from the main LLVM tree, as > > it is big and will (hopefully!) keep

dear R-friends, i`ve got a large dataset of vegetation-samples with about 500 variables(=species) in the following format: 1 spec1 1 spec23 1 spec54 1 spec63 2 spec1 2 spec2 2 spec253 2 spec300 2 spec423 3 spec20 3 spec88 3 spec121 3 spec200 3 spec450 . . this means: sample 1 (grassland) with the species (=spec) 1, 23, 54, 63 is it possible to get a following data-structure for further

Hi. My samba server is working for everybody but the logs are full of "NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED" messages So I turned logging a little higher and found out what shares/files are accessed when this happens. It, too, happens not to ALL users. I see this: guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (TestPrograms) [2015/03/17 16:00:58.165672, 1]

Hi John, I have attached my Makefile.config. I noticed that I did'nt have SRC_ROOT and OBJ_ROOT variables defined as such in my environment. But I noticed that this is defined in the Makefile.config by default to the same values. All the same, I tried defining both these variables in my .cshrc, but I still get the same error. The main directory for me is /home/llvm, and I have

Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > >

These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting this when running make-test :- > > $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure > checking for

> > yesterday I got new SuSE 9.1 DVD, so i am going to enter this > > river again. Perhaps, this time all will be fine. > > Sounds great, please let me know how it goes. SuSE 9.1 is running OK. after 30 minute of compilation i get first errors: ********************* make[2]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/llvm/runtime/libtrace' make[2]: Entering directory

Hi Chris, It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. ----- 1513158 is not prime. Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with -enable-correct-eh-support. lli[0x8429bb4] lli[0x8429dc0] /lib/libc.so.6[0x40128c18] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x161)[0x40129cb5] [0x403da922] ../../../i386: line 4: 27606

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > >> These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the >> legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from >> another source, you need to configure

Hi James, > It depends on how your bitcode is loaded. It can be loaded either by llc, > which outputs pure ELF/Mach-O, in which case those function references get > turned into relocations that the linker (ld, Gold) applies. > > If you're loading bitcode via the JIT, it uses dlsym() to try and introspect > your runtime environment to find the symbol. Ah, that makes sense -

> > Hrm, you probably have to tell it how to check out the LLVM tree. The > /home/vadve/shared/PublicCVS path is the internal path to the root of the > CVS repository. I'm not sure if the tester script has the ability to > check out the tree over anon cvs yet. Reid do you know? :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:2401/var/cvs/llvm work for me Waiting test results...

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > > check out the tree over anon cvs yet. Reid do you know? > :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:2401/var/cvs/llvm work for me > > Waiting test results... Great! It might take a while. The tester takes about 6 hours to run on a 2proc 3.0ghz Xeon box :) But that's with spec95/2k and povray included. -Chris --

Hi Unnikrishnan C, On 18/01/13 09:09, unni_c at csa.iisc.ernet.in wrote: > Hello, > > I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm > module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? > > Unnikrishnan C do you know how to run LLVM's nightly testsuite? It has support for SPEC. When you configure LLVM you need to use --with-externals to

Hello, I want to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM to check correctness of a llvm module which I wrote. How to run SPEC2000 benchmark in LLVM? Unnikrishnan C -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

This is a real newbie question. What makes it worse is that I know I've seen the answer somewhere, but I can no longer find it. If I have a loop that is supposed to generate a vector piecemeal, adding an element each time through the loop, what do I do to stop it failing the first time around the loop, when the vector doesn't yet exist (so I can't use the append() function)?

On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:17, Chris Lattner wrote: > I guess I don't understand why making these changes is not > straight-forward and incremental. It seems as though #1 is just strictly > local changes to llvm/test/Programs/Makefile.programs, with no other > changes. This can be tested and worked on exactly as you mentioned, and > there should be zero breakage in the process.