similar to: [LLVMdev] SSA

Hi Chris, It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. ----- 1513158 is not prime. Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with -enable-correct-eh-support. lli[0x8429bb4] lli[0x8429dc0] /lib/libc.so.6[0x40128c18] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x161)[0x40129cb5] [0x403da922] ../../../i386: line 4: 27606

Ok, my spec95 installation is completely different, so I'll try and figure out what options are needed for each benchmark separately by looking at the code that creates the makefiles. Meanwhile, I had another question - is there a way in llvm to look at the SSA form of a program and then modify the SSA, and then recompile this modified SSA ? If so, is there any documentation regarding

Vinay, On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:27:53PM -0500, Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote: > It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error > when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. > ----- > 1513158 is not prime. > Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with > -enable-correct-eh-support. [snip] This error message is from LLVM, not the

Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by John, and after running configure, I get the following error while running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC ---- make[1]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95/099.go'

Alright, I can now see my hammocks being translated into phi nodes. Thanx for the info. I now have a question regarding the analyze tool. I noticed it has a -help option. I tried using the -print-cfg option. It creates a cfg.main.dot file. Is there a graphical tool I can use to view this graph ? Thanx, -- Vinay S. Belgaumkar

Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote: > Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by > John, and after running configure, I get the following error while > running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC Hmmm. It sounds like the Makefiles are not creating the gccld command line correctly. Some questions: 1) Can you send us your Makefile.config? 2) Can you tell us

Hello, I am trying to compile 134.perl - the spec95 benchmark using LLVM and I am getting the following error message - -------------------------------------------- 34.perl/symbol/dolist.c:1786: warning: "struct tm" declared inside parameter list 134.perl/symbol/dolist.c:1786: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > llvm-as file.bc | opt -mem2reg | llvm-dis > file.ll llvm-as < file.bc | opt -mem2reg | llvm-dis > file.ll Note the extra "<". -Chris > On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 09:12 +0800, lizhuo wrote: >> meone tell me how to convert LLVM bytecode into minimal SSA form ? >> or just depend on GCC frontend ? > -Chris --

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:04:36PM -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > >llvm-as file.bc | opt -mem2reg | llvm-dis > file.ll > > llvm-as < file.bc | opt -mem2reg | llvm-dis > file.ll > > Note the extra "<". Strictly speaking, llvm-as converts .ll to .bc so that would be: llvm-as < input.ll | opt -mem2reg |

Hi all LLVMor, I just tried to compile a simple code and analyze the number of the basic blocks. But after compile, what I got, the bytecode is seems to be optimized bytecode. So the information of basic blocks is not what I expected. I want ot use the code as example to see how some of code optimization methods work. However, after compiling file using llvm test.c -o test, bytecode file

Hi, I am working with llvm 1.3 on a sparcv9 machine. I have successfully built llvm and llvm-gcc frontend. I can run many tools including llvmgcc, llvm-dis, and llc. After using /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc to assemble .s file into a program binary, I can run the binary correctly as well. I am interested in the JIT compiler (lli). When I directly run the LLVM bytecode using interpretation ("lli

Hi, Is it possible to recreate the LoopInfo analysis in my pass? Thanks , Vinay On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > This is not currently supported by the LLVM pass manager system. It is a > serious deficiency that I (and others) would like to address, but it > requires significant changes to the pass manager and analysis

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, vinay m <mvinay05041990 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to recreate the LoopInfo analysis in my pass? > No. You need your pass to be a FunctionPass in order to use the LoopInfo (and associated) analyses. > > Thanks , > Vinay > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:

I am trying to compile and install openssh-3.9p1 (with openssl-0.9.7j) on my personal dev env to have a play. I get the below mentioned segmentation fault message. --------- Generating public/private rsa1 key pair. /bin/sh: line 1: 10901 Segmentation fault ./ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -f /home/vinay/var/vinay_ssh/etc/ssh_host_key -N "" Generating public/private dsa key pair. /bin/sh: line

Hi, When I compile httpd-2.0, llvmgcc reports many struct types and macros undeclared, but gnu-gcc can compile httpd-2.0 completely.

I have used the patch to build opus 1.1. Although I have not tried the latest git master, will try that. Will that work for armv7, armv7s and arm64? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Martin Storsj? <martin at martin.st> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Jonathan Lennox wrote: > > >> On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote: >>

I'm CC'ing the llvm-dev list because other people are more knowledgeable about the bytecode format/encoding than I am. Please follow-up the replies to the list. On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:27:53AM -0700, Yiping Fan wrote: > We also want to extend the llvm instructions/intrinsic > functions/types/passes to support our high-level synthesis for > hardware. First of all, we want to

Hi Reid Spencer, > CC=/path/to/llvmgcc CXX=/path/to/llvmg++ configure > make > > and was able to reproduce the problem. Not sure what's up with that but > as Misha pointed out, llvmgcc isn't any "particular" version of 3.4, its > just 3.4ish. I also concur with him that you should file a bug and > attach the pre-processed source to it. You can get that with

Hi all, Any news on the cygwin front? What needs to be done? Can I help? Oleg.

Hi, I'm a newbie and just installed LLVM on a Linux box. I followe "The LLVM Getting Started Guide" on the web and have some trouble on the section "An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain". When I compile the simple hello.c program with "llvmgcc hello.c -o hello", the system complains -- gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `gccas': Permission denied. Does