similar to: [LLVMdev] Jello

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Jello"

2004 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] 134.perl
Hi Chris, It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. ----- 1513158 is not prime. Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with -enable-correct-eh-support. lli[0x8429bb4] lli[0x8429dc0] /lib/libc.so.6[0x40128c18] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x161)[0x40129cb5] [0x403da922] ../../../i386: line 4: 27606
2004 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] spec95
Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by John, and after running configure, I get the following error while running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC ---- make[1]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95/099.go'
2004 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] spec95
Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote: > Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by > John, and after running configure, I get the following error while > running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC Hmmm. It sounds like the Makefiles are not creating the gccld command line correctly. Some questions: 1) Can you send us your Makefile.config? 2) Can you tell us
2004 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] Makefile.config
Hi John, I have attached my Makefile.config. I noticed that I did'nt have SRC_ROOT and OBJ_ROOT variables defined as such in my environment. But I noticed that this is defined in the Makefile.config by default to the same values. All the same, I tried defining both these variables in my .cshrc, but I still get the same error. The main directory for me is /home/llvm, and I have
2004 Mar 31
1
[LLVMdev] 134.perl
Hello, I am trying to compile 134.perl - the spec95 benchmark using LLVM and I am getting the following error message - -------------------------------------------- 34.perl/symbol/dolist.c:1786: warning: "struct tm" declared inside parameter list 134.perl/symbol/dolist.c:1786: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
2004 Apr 05
1
[LLVMdev] SSA
Sorry for the confusion, Misha seemed to answer my question in one way. It'll be easier if I break down my question into parts - - Is it possible to see the SSA form generated for my program ? - Now, if this form is readable, is it in assembly code format ? We want to look at the SSA form for any program and see if we can make some changes ourselves to that format so that its reflected in
2004 Apr 05
1
[LLVMdev] CFG
Alright, I can now see my hammocks being translated into phi nodes. Thanx for the info. I now have a question regarding the analyze tool. I noticed it has a -help option. I tried using the -print-cfg option. It creates a cfg.main.dot file. Is there a graphical tool I can use to view this graph ? Thanx, -- Vinay S. Belgaumkar
2004 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] 134.perl
Vinay, On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:27:53PM -0500, Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote: > It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error > when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. > ----- > 1513158 is not prime. > Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with > -enable-correct-eh-support. [snip] This error message is from LLVM, not the
2003 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] Location of the x86 JIT compiler tool
Hi, I'm mainly insterested on the x86 JIT compiler. /lib/Target/X86/README.txt talks about 'Jello', the JIT compiler, which should be on /tools/jello. I think that changed to /tools/lli and now comprises a bytecode interpreter as well. Is that right? -- Oscar
2012 Oct 03
2
[LLVMdev] LoopInfo analysis in CallGraphSCCPass
Hi, Is it possible to recreate the LoopInfo analysis in my pass? Thanks , Vinay On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > This is not currently supported by the LLVM pass manager system. It is a > serious deficiency that I (and others) would like to address, but it > requires significant changes to the pass manager and analysis
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] LoopInfo analysis in CallGraphSCCPass
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, vinay m <mvinay05041990 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to recreate the LoopInfo analysis in my pass? > No. You need your pass to be a FunctionPass in order to use the LoopInfo (and associated) analyses. > > Thanks , > Vinay > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
2010 Feb 05
2
Segmentation Fault while compiling and installing openssh-3.9p1
I am trying to compile and install openssh-3.9p1 (with openssl-0.9.7j) on my personal dev env to have a play. I get the below mentioned segmentation fault message. --------- Generating public/private rsa1 key pair. /bin/sh: line 1: 10901 Segmentation fault ./ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -f /home/vinay/var/vinay_ssh/etc/ssh_host_key -N "" Generating public/private dsa key pair. /bin/sh: line
2014 Mar 27
3
arm64 support
I have used the patch to build opus 1.1. Although I have not tried the latest git master, will try that. Will that work for armv7, armv7s and arm64? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Martin Storsj? <martin at martin.st> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Jonathan Lennox wrote: > > >> On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote: >>
2009 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b
2005 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
Some of the run commandlines don't seem to be the *default ref* configuration. For instance, in 099.go, what's in the script is: LEVEL = ../../../.. BM=099.go ifeq ($(RUN_TYPE),test) STDIN_FILENAME = /dev/null STDOUT_FILENAME = null.out RUN_OPTIONS = 40 19 else STDIN_FILENAME = 2stone9.in STDOUT_FILENAME = 2stone9.out RUN_OPTIONS = 50 9 endif include ../../Makefile.spec95
2005 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95 benchmarks ? I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am not sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them seem to use smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago, so few people around me know how to compile and run them. I am building from
2014 Mar 27
1
arm64 support
I am trying to generate the config and makefiles using ./autogen.sh on the mac but get the following error: Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/local/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 326. autoreconf: failed to run aclocal: No such file or directory How do I build opus from source? Am I missing some step? On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Vinay Nair
2009 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > >
2014 Mar 26
2
arm64 support
On Mar 26, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Vinay <vinay.nair at novanet.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wanted to build opus along with PJSIP for iOS for the architecture arm64. >> I wanted to know if opus supports arm64? > > The opus code builds fine on ARM64 on Linux at least,
2005 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > which suggests the compiling command: > gcc -DSPEC_CPU95 -O2 -o spec_go g2.c g22.c g23.c g25.c g26.c g27a.c g27b.c > g28.c g29.c g2eye.c g2jlib2.c g2jos.c g2list.c g2reas.c g2s2.c g2s3.c g2shp.c > and the running commandline: > ./spec_go 50 9 2stone9.in > < are these correct ? > I believe that we only include test/train inputs for