Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Makefile.config"
2004 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] UPDATE: Makefile.rules Changes (IMPORTANT)
If you're on the new Makefile system, you will want to update your
Makefile.rules. The patch below provides some important fixes for
parallel builds and dependencies. It also adds some new features like
the -local targets. For example, you can now build "all-local" to build
the local directory without recursing into subdirectories.
See the comments below for details of the change.
2003 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Makefile.config&setenv
yue wrote:
> hi,
> about [LLVMdev] another question
>
> thanks
>
> yueqiang
One other thing you might want to try is to put your object tree in a
directory that is *not* inside of your source tree. Currently, we don't
support using separate object trees that are subdirectories of the
source tree.
In other words:
Will work:
==========
SRC_ROOT=/home/yue/llvm
2004 Oct 26
1
[LLVMdev] dist-check implemented
My final foray into the makefiles for a while has been completed. The
dist-check target is the golden nugget I was hoping to get out of automake.
But, now LLVM Makefiles have it too.
dist-check does the following:
* builds everything with "check" to ensure the source of the distribution is
sane, essentially "make check".
* builds the distribution tar balls with
2005 Jan 14
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
Hi,
In buildling XPS using LLVM's makefile system, I'm finding that there's
a few things lacking in our support for LLVM-based projects. The items
below should help but may require changes to project makefiles. I
thought I'd check before just going and doing it.
1. Various autoconf generated variables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are
set in the makefiles but not used. They
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working
from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project,
please make a note of the following:
1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be
prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example,
BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT.
2. There are additional requirements
2013 Mar 23
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.2 compilation with RTTI enabled
Hi all,
I'm having problems compiling LLVM 3.2 with RTTI enabled. Since my code makes heavy use of the Boost libraries, RTTI is a must. This is the script I use to compile (as root):
SRC_ROOT=$PWD
OBJ_ROOT=/export/apps/llvm
INSTALL_ROOT=/usr/local
mkdir -p $OBJ_ROOT
cd $OBJ_ROOT
$SRC_ROOT/configure --prefix=$INSTALL_ROOT \
2004 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] spec95
Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by
John, and after running configure, I get the following error while
running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC
----
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/External/SPEC/CINT95/099.go'
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working
from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project,
please make a note of the following:
1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be
prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example,
BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT.
2. There are additional requirements for projects.
2004 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] spec95
Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote:
> Ok, I am trying to configure llvm to compile benchmarks as suggested by
> John, and after running configure, I get the following error while
> running make in the /test/Programs/External/SPEC
Hmmm. It sounds like the Makefiles are not creating the gccld command
line correctly.
Some questions:
1) Can you send us your Makefile.config?
2) Can you tell us
2005 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95
benchmarks ?
I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am
not sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them
seem to use smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago,
so few people around me know how to compile and run them.
I am building from
2005 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
The llvm.cs.uiuc.edu site does not seem to be updating at the moment so
it contains the old instructions. If you're looking for the new
instructions on the Projects.html page, you can view them here:
http://illuvium.net/docs/Projects.html
Reid.
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 18:30, Reid Spencer wrote:
> The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working
> from CVS head and
2005 Feb 14
1
[LLVMdev] Fix using old BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/BUILD_SRC_ROOT in 2 LLVM makefiles [PATCH]
I found use old BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/BUILD_SRC_ROOT in comment in
llvm/Makefile.common
and in llvm/projects/Stacker/test/Makefile code.
I update it to PROJ_* in attached patches.
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Makefile.common.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2005 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
Some of the run commandlines don't seem to be the *default ref*
configuration. For instance, in 099.go, what's in the script is:
LEVEL = ../../../..
BM=099.go
ifeq ($(RUN_TYPE),test)
STDIN_FILENAME = /dev/null
STDOUT_FILENAME = null.out
RUN_OPTIONS = 40 19
else
STDIN_FILENAME = 2stone9.in
STDOUT_FILENAME = 2stone9.out
RUN_OPTIONS = 50 9
endif
include ../../Makefile.spec95
2005 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote:
> Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95
> benchmarks ?
>
> I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am not
> sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them seem to use
> smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago, so few people
2005 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] Need help on SPEC 95 "standard" commandlines
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote:
> which suggests the compiling command:
> gcc -DSPEC_CPU95 -O2 -o spec_go g2.c g22.c g23.c g25.c g26.c g27a.c g27b.c
> g28.c g29.c g2eye.c g2jlib2.c g2jos.c g2list.c g2reas.c g2s2.c g2s3.c g2shp.c
> and the running commandline:
> ./spec_go 50 9 2stone9.in
> < are these correct ? >
I believe that we only include test/train inputs for
2004 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] 134.perl
Hi Chris,
It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error
when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine.
-----
1513158 is not prime.
Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with
-enable-correct-eh-support.
lli[0x8429bb4]
lli[0x8429dc0]
/lib/libc.so.6[0x40128c18]
/lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x161)[0x40129cb5]
[0x403da922]
../../../i386: line 4: 27606
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
Hello,
I've closed PR106 (use automake) as WONTFIX. I've already delineated the
problems with automake in previous posts but as of now, all the automake
related stuff has been removed from the repository.
In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes
to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of
our compilations. I
2003 Dec 04
2
[LLVMdev] another question
hi,
when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful.
but run following test, then the error occues:
-----------------------------------------------------
[yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs
make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs'
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource'
make[2]: Entering directory
2009 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] configure problems under msys
Hello, Bob
> download the latest from the head of the trunk, then ran 'configure' under
> msys and received the following.... has anyone done this under msys on a
> windows pc??
Msys works fine for me. What is the version of msys you're using? What
is the version of bash?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
2004 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
Hi Reid, just a quick note while you're doing this, a while ago I ran
into a problem that the standard makefiles weren't building libraries
(like, say, a new pass) correctly on OS X - they were being built as
shared libraries and not bundles, so they couldn't be loaded with
dlopen. The discussion is in the archives if you want more details...
I fixed it locally by doing the following