similar to: [LLVMdev] Annotations on IR

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Rahul Joshi wrote: > I checked out the LLVM code today, and it seems Value is > no longer a subclass of Annotable. Is IR annotation still > supported? Right now, I just need to annotate global variables. Nope, we removed that from the IR from CVS (what will be 1.2 soon). The Annotation class had several problems and wasn't needed. In any case where you used

Chris, I am thinking of using LLVM as a platform to carry out my research in using static analsis for program security and safety/system biology. What I look forward from you in response to this mail is the availability of support and commitment by your team in continuing LLVM. Secondly, in addition to the application of LLvM mention on website, do you know other poeple using LLVM..

Hello, I have observed that the LLVM build takes pretty long time to link executables (i.e. tools). Is that a normal behavior? Thanks, Rahul

Hi LLVMdev, The stuff I am working on requires linking 9-10 LLVM libraries, along with a few libs of my own. The linker is taking a long time to do that, about 6 mins (on a P4 with 512 MB mem). I tried the latest (2.14) release of binutils, but that didn't help. Is anyone aware of any solution to this? Thanks, Rahul

Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent others. Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM namespac'ification >To: LLVMdev List

Hi LLVMdev, Sorry about the bad title, but I hope you will get my idea. I think that in many LLVM programs that create/modify the LLVM IR (like say a language frontend/profiler etc), and in other cases too, some of the code is just "mechanical", for example creating function types takes like 4-5 lines of code, but nothing interesting goes on there. I think we can get rid of such code by

Hi, I want to run the Mem2Reg pass on a function without using the the LLVM opt utility. I wrote some code, which I am not sure is correct: TS_ASSERT(!verifyFunction(*function)); // find the dominance frontier of the CFG DominanceFrontier DF; DF.runOnFunction(*function); // try to promote stack allocated variables PromoteMemToReg(function->getRegAllocas(), DF, *tgt_data);

Hi, As far as I know, Instruction class does not inherit "Annotable" Class. Only Function inherits annotable according to the documentation of annotable class. What you are asking would require adding annotations at instruction level, which does not seem to be possible. You can maintain external maps between instructions and your annotations, --Kapil On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM,

hi all, out of a matter of fact I am still using llvm version 1.5. I don't know how 1.6 works in this matter. When translating a complex c application to llvm bytecodes, some semantics are lost: Take for isntance the interesting attribute to put a variable in the thread local data section (.tdata), this would be interesting to have in llvm. like in GCC you write: int x

Hi Rahul, I believe that ARM support is working in the MCJIT engine (as of llvm 3.1). If it wasn't working in the legacy JIT engine 10 months ago then it probably still isn't. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Rahul Garg Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:13 PM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re:

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jakob Praher wrote: > out of a matter of fact I am still using llvm version 1.5. I don't know > how 1.6 works in this matter. ok. > When translating a complex c application to llvm bytecodes, some > semantics are lost: > > Take for isntance the interesting attribute to put a variable in the > thread local data section (.tdata), this would be

Thanks. I am not trying to modify convert generic LLVM IR and know the requirements (such as specifying address spaces etc.). I guess I just need to ensure that I am sticking to LLVM 3.2 and the SPIR specified subset+ metadata annotations etc. Anyway, I was confused partly because there are references to a SPIR backend in LLVM code (eg: include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h lists spir and spir64 as possible

Rahul Agarwal Analyst Equities Quantitative Research UBS_ISC, Hyderabad On Net: 19 533 6363 hi let me explain you the problem we have a database which is in this format Stocks 30-Jan-08 28-Feb-08 31-Mar-08 30-Apr-08 a 1.00 3.00 7.00 3.00 b 2.00 4.00 4.00 7.00 c 3.00 8.00 655.00 3.00 d 4.00 23.00 4.00 5.00 e 5.00 78.00 6.00 5.00 and we have a query

Hello all, I am a newbie at R, with some experience in PERL. I have a database table that contains the following data: Name | Score ======= | ===== Sachin T | 25 Sachin T | 53 Sachin T | 57 Sachin T | 34 Rahul D | 38 Rahul D | 31 Rahul D | 53 Ricky P | 7 Ricky P | 45 Ricky P | 27 Ricky P | 17 Ricky P | 86 Ricky P | 48 Jacques K | 23 Jacques K | 86 Jacques K | 32 I

The only reference that I found so far here: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2011-09-16/EuroLLVM2011-LLVMplusARM.pdf The presenter states that the ARM JIT support is broken. But this is about 10 months old. Is the ARM JIT support still broken? Am I not looking at the right places in the documentation? Help will be appreciated. thanks, Rahul On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Rahul Garg <rahulgarg44 at

Hi. I am trying to get data from mysql database using a couple of queries. I do one query to find out the indexes. Then i need to use these indexes in another query, but i keep getting errors. Here is something: numb <- dbSendQuery(con2, "select distinct(comparison) from table1") count <- fetch(numb, -1) my.matrix <- as.matrix(count) rs <- dbSendQuery(con2, "select

Hi Rahul, If you're certain that your problem isn't as Stephen suggested, you might want to have a look at this: --- (From http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html <http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html> ) How do I let vlan-tagged traffic go through a vlan bridge port and the other traffic through a non-vlan bridge port? Suppose eth0 and eth0.15 are ports of br0.

I have Centos 7 mail server installed with dovecot and postfix with MariaDB. I am trying to add a virtual All Mails folder for every user so that they can have all mails such as inbox, sent in a single folder, something like gmail. Please help me for this. *Regards,* *Rahul* -------------- next part -------------- [rahul at surrey ~]$ dovecot --version 2.2.10 [rahul at surrey ~]$ dovecot -n #

Hi Rahul, Thanks for your interest! Our work does not attempt to make any significant contributions to alias analysis, and acts as a client to existing LLVM AA. Furthermore, the options passed to the AESOP frontend scripts are obeyed at compile time, but at link time certain transformations occur unconditionally. Here, AESOP has actually thwarted your experiment by performing inlining just

Hi Marcelo, Thanks for replying, I do not know what this branch is. Could you please let me know. Also, I enabled google cloud speech API only from the console. Do I need more API enabled? On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Marcelo Terres <mhterres at gmail.com> wrote: > Did you already tried the cloud_api branch? > > Regards, > > Marcelo H. Terres <mhterres at