similar to: [LLVMdev] ObjectFiles.html

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > One of the things that I don't understand well about LLVM is what code > is in what object files or library archives. It would be very useful if > there was a map of the dependencies between the files (e.g. if you link > X.o you need Y.a and Z.o). Trying to figure out the link lines by trial > and error is a bit frustrating. No

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Could someone please add this file to the LLVM docs directory so I can > > submit patches against it? BTW, here's some hints for it: libtransforms.a -> contains only the level raise pass libtarget.a -> contains code generator support for describing target architectures libanalysis.a -> intraprocedural analyses libipa.a

Could someone apply the attached patch for the ObjectFiles.html document? Thanks, Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ObjectFiles.html.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 4952 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040227/3f6f07e4/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A

On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 07:20, Chris Lattner wrote: > > As you mentioned in the case of x86 backend, this may make a lot of > > sense. On the other hand, it presumes the developers of LLVM know how > > the users want to use LLVM! Say there's a little utility function in > > the x86 backend that I want to use but I'm not generating any x86 code? > > If

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 22:41, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > Could someone please add this file to the LLVM docs directory so I can > > > submit patches against it? > > BTW, here's some hints for it: Thanks Chris, I'll add them. > Basically, libraries are built in two forms: .a files and .o files. .o > files are

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > This works as long as the libraries are fine-grained _enough_. They > probably are so I'm not going to make an issue out of this because there > are bigger fish to fry. If not, they can always be split up later. :) > > Well, in the long term we want to switch everything over to docbook, at > > which point it should just be a

> While I understand the motivations you describe above, something about > this bothers me. As a tool provider the LLVM developers are trying to > provide small/fast/quick linking tools. The above approach helps with > some of that. However, I'm an LLVM user and a big part of using LLVM is > linking my code with LLVM code. When the LLVM developers opt to make a > .o

It is possible to list binaries in BinaryFiles and thereby excluded them from R CMD check (although they are disallowed by CRAN). I am interested in the same functionality, but for object files. Background: in Rgraphviz, we (I) include pre-compiled object files for use on Windows, because generating these object files requires a full unix environment, and not just the pieces exposed in Rtools. I

Okay, the problem with this cycle is LoopSimplify. It is using AliasAnalysis which is where that _ZN4llvm11BasicAAStubEv symbol is coming from. It seems to me that LoopSimplify.cpp is in the wrong place. This file defines the LoopSimplify FunctionPass which doesn't seem to me to be a "transform util". I thought the purpose of "Transforms/Util" was to provide utilities

Okay, its not that simple. Several files in Transforms/Utils depend on things in lib/Analysis. A quick grep shows: BreakCriticalEdges.cpp:#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h" BreakCriticalEdges.cpp:#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" CloneTrace.cpp:#include "llvm/Analysis/Trace.h" CodeExtractor.cpp:#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"

const uint64_t UnknownAddressOrSize <http://llvm.org/doxygen/namespacellvm_1_1object.html#abcfa9b6f24c69c52d2489a102ba3583c> = ~0ULL This found at line 260 in ObjectFile.h. Notice the 0ULL thingy. Cheers, Mikael -- Love Thy Frog! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Mikael Lyngvig > Subject: [LLVMdev] Minor typo in source file ObjectFile.h > const uint64_t UnknownAddressOrSize = ~0ULL > This found at line 260 in ObjectFile.h.  Notice the 0ULL thingy. What do you find troubling about it? It's simply a way to set all bits in an unsigned variable. -

Here we go again... It took me a while to figure out that the stuff below is valid: ~0ull. I never saw the suffix written in uppercase before and the code below must be eligble for a price in hilarious coincidences. Cheers, Mikael ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> Date: 2012/5/31 Subject: Minor typo in source file ObjectFile.h To:

Hey! I've been studying the LLVM C bindings (include/llvm-c/) and it 's not very clear to me how I could create an ELF object file with them. Function "LLVMCreateObjectFile" (in Object.h) needs an "LLVMMemoryBufferRef" object but I'm not sure how I should create one using the created "LLVMModuleRef". The reason why I want to use the C bindings and

Hi all, I am having hard time figuring out how I should use the API for JIT in LLVM 6. In LLVM 3.9 I am used to adding all objects at once and emitAndFinalizing them all: handle = objectLayer.addObjectSet(objectFiles, memoryManager, resolver); objectLayer.emitAndFinalize(handle); In LLVM 6.0 the objects are added one by one: auto handle = objectLayer.addObject(objectFile, resolver).get();

Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi Sanjiv, > > 2009/6/23 <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> > >>> BTW, Chris's Makefile changes broke llvmc yesterday (r75379). I'm >>> working on a fix. >>> >> Hi Mikhail, >> Did you get a chance to fix this. I still get errors while building examples. >> >> > > This issue

I am looking at using acts_as_versioned to manage revisions of data in several tables in my application. However, the default behavior of acts_as_versioned appears to apply to individual rows within a table. The tables I want to version are complicated lookup tables and what I really want is to version the entire contents of each table as a single set. Adding a row, deleting a row, or updating

I remember seeing one with an example migrating from an old fashioned filesystem on a partition to a new filesystem on a mirrored lvm logical volume but one only one side of the mirror is set up at this time. First I need to copy stuff from what will become the second side of the mirror to filesystem on the first side or the mirror Then I will be ready to follow the rest of the tutorial and

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20040227/923b87ee/PGP.bin

Hi all! I new to R (I don't know anything about S+ either!) I've a simple question: How do I generate overlay plots in R? So far as I can see the plot(x, y) operator will only give me one graph and the plot(x ~ y + z) will give me 2 separate plots. Is there an easy way to overlay or am I missing the obvious? Any help welcome. Gerard Keogh The information in this email, and any