similar to: [LLVMdev] Transcoding UTF-8 to ASCII?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Transcoding UTF-8 to ASCII?"

2014 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] Increase the flexibility of the AsmLexer in parsing identifiers.
Hello, I would like to gather some ideas and opinions on how to make the default AsmLexer more flexible when dealing with Identifiers. When the lexer emits something as an "Identifier" (read. String of characters) it means that it needs to be parsed all at once in a single go, even if it contains elements that might be wanted to be parsed as separate entities. In that case it is needed
2009 Jul 02
3
[LLVMdev] Get identifier for unnamed temporary
Is there a way through the Value class to get the identifier for an unnamed temporary? Or alternatively, could someone point me to the code where temporaries are assigned sequential numbers as identifiers so I can better understand this issue? Thanks, Scott
2013 Feb 18
8
Error with service: "invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII"
I just built a new puppet master, and whenever I run puppet on it, it throws an error while processing a service resource: # puppet agent -t > Info: Retrieving plugin > Info: Caching catalog for i-45dc2b1d > Info: Applying configuration version ''g > 9ea47ad19bc706a754c00f00a024309948d3ea03'' > Error: /Stage[main]/Ipa::Client::Basic/Service[sssd]: Could not
2009 Jul 02
2
[LLVMdev] Get identifier for unnamed temporary
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote: > VMCore will auto-unique value names for you. Most passes just create > all instructions with a name like "tmp" and let VMCore unique them. > Is this enough for you? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Eli Friedman<eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > The relevant code is
2009 Jul 02
0
[LLVMdev] Get identifier for unnamed temporary
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Scott Ricketts<sricketts at maxentric.com> wrote: > Is there a way through the Value class to get the identifier for an > unnamed temporary? Or alternatively, could someone point me to the > code where temporaries are assigned sequential numbers as identifiers > so I can better understand this issue? The relevant code is
2013 Nov 27
4
[LLVMdev] Bug in Language Reference? %0 versus %1 as starting index.
The language reference states that local temporaries begin with index 0, but if I try that on my not-entirely-up-to-date v3.4 llc (it is like a week old), I get an error "instruction expected to be numbered '%1'". Also, quite a few examples in the LR uses %0 as a local identifier. Should I fix those or is it a problem in llc? -- Mikael -------------- next part --------------
2007 Aug 23
2
xPL and Asterisk?
I tried asking in another thread this week, but I'm not sure people saw the actual subject of the question. Does anyone know where to find documentation of xPL, the home automation interface? Specifically for integrating it with Asterisk. xPL is part of Trixbox, so it's being used, but where is some expertise for using it without Trixbox? -- (C) Matthew Rubenstein
2007 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] Floating point constants (bug?)
>From the language guide: "The one non-intuitive notation for constants is the optional hexadecimal form of floating point constants. For example, the form 'double 0x432ff973cafa8000' is equivalent to (but harder to read than) 'double 4.5e+15'. The only time hexadecimal floating point constants are required (and the only time that they are generated by the disassembler) is
2007 Aug 22
0
Asterisk Home Automation (was: Re: 99 bottles of beer)
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:50 -0500, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:01:50 -0400 > From: "David Cook" <dbc_asterisk at advan.ca> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 99 bottles of beer > To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <012501c7e458$05919370$10b4ba50$@ca> > Content-Type: text/plain;
2013 Nov 27
2
[LLVMdev] Bug in Language Reference? %0 versus %1 as starting index.
Thanks for the lecture :) But I was not planning on changing a single line in LLVM/Clang. I stick to the documentation until I've learned to swim, perhaps even forever. Ah, now I see. You thought I meant "should I modify the code to do this or that." I only meant to change the documentation. Please refer to the patch I've sent on LLVM-commits. That's about what I had
2004 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] 9 Ideas To Better Support Source Language Developers
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > A while back I promised to provide some feedback on useful extensions to > LLVM to better support source language writers (i.e. those _using_ LLVM, > not developing it). Below is a list of the ideas I've come up with so > far. Cool! Ideas are alway welcome! > If you respond to this, please respond to each item in a separate >
2007 May 24
2
SCCP
Any one knows where to install chan_sccp for asterisk 1.4 ???????. Please guide me from where can I download the asterisk 1.4 sccp channel driver and how to install it because I tried to get chan_sccp-mayday05.tar.gz When I trying to install it ,error happened like this. Please help me how to solve this issue. [root@XPL t]# cd chan_sccp [root@XPL chan_sccp]# make clean rm -rf
2004 Jan 06
4
[LLVMdev] 9 Ideas To Better Support Source Language Developers
A while back I promised to provide some feedback on useful extensions to LLVM to better support source language writers (i.e. those _using_ LLVM, not developing it). Below is a list of the ideas I've come up with so far. As I get more of XPL's compiler done, I'll start diving into each of the these areas. I'm posting early in the hopes that discussion will bear some fruit. In
2012 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM build fails using gcc-4.7.0 and -std=c++11 flags
I just updated my llvm sources (revision 164794.) and I see the error, "overriding non-deleted function" when building with gcc 4.7.0 and passing -std=c++11. /usr2/sidneym/llvm/tools/install/bin/c++ -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_DEBUG -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -std=c++11 -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -I/local/scratch/llvm-tmp/build/lib/VMCore
2007 Dec 23
1
[LLVMdev] compilaton problem
Hi. For weeks now I have problems compiling llvm from svn, compilation ends with llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Release build /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l: In function 'int llvmAsmlex()': /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:278: error: 'PURE' was not declared in this scope /home/borist/builds/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:279: error: 'CONST'
2011 Oct 22
9
[LLVMdev] Question about local variables
Nick, Unfortunately this doesn't answer my question I don't think. It seems that -instnamer, as you mention, names the instructions but still does not name the local variables. So there really is no way to do this shy of creating (or basically copying) the API from AsmWriter (seems very dedundant to me)? This seems like a large failing? On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Nick
2010 Dec 21
2
A Question about VBR
Congrats to the team for 0.10.0. It sounds really good in the tests I've done so far. I'm really looking forward to the 1.0 release. One question though: could you explain briefly the difference between VBR and unconstrained VBR? And, in my case, the $64K question: is there any situation where CELT could produce more data than specified by nbCompressedBytes when encoding? Thanks
2008 Mar 24
1
[LLVMdev] AsmParser/Lexer.l error
Hello With the latest LLVM from Subversion (rev48737 from http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk) I'm getting make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Lang/llvm/_Obj/lib/AsmParser' llvm[2]: Flexing Lexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling Lexer.cpp for Debug build /usr/src/Lang/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l: In function 'int llvmAsmlex()': /usr/src/Lang/llvm/lib/AsmParser/Lexer.l:278: error:
2007 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Antw.: 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
> On Slackware 10.2 (GCC 3.3.6), I got an error during a debug build with the > header files using uintptr_t (not recognised as a type). Putting "#include > <stdint.h>" in include/llvm/BasicBlock.h (llvm) and in > "include/llvm/ValueSymbolTable.h" (frontend) resolved this. Ok. This is now fixed on the release branch. Thanks! > Also, I got linking
2004 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] Can't Figure Out My Error :(
The XPL compiler produced the attached OneOfEach.bc file without error or warning from either LLVM or XPLC. However when I llvm-dis the file, I get: llvm-dis: Failed value look-up for name 'entry' The Bytecode Reader prints this out when it can't find the associated value for the name. Obviously I botched something in the XPL compiler but I would have thought the verified would