similar to: [LLVMdev] how to solve this conflict

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] how to solve this conflict"

2003 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] Re: how to solve following question
Dear yueqiang, I tracked this down this morning, and it is a bug with our Python code that runs the tests. Essentially what is happening is that the code is finding the temporary directory it created the first time it ran the tests and believes that there are tests inside of it which it needs to run. It then gets confused and quits. This bug only shows up when the source tree and the
2005 Jun 29
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.5 C Front-End Binaries for FreeBSD?
Sean Peisert wrote: > John, > > I may be missing something here, but if I the compilation docs, I need > to build LLVM first and the C frontend second. But doing this, I > get: > > **llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ was not found, > > (obviously -- it wasn't installed, right?) You do need to build LLVM first before building llvm-gcc. This may seem a bit weird, but
2004 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
You should download and install in the first shot: a.. LLVM source code (3.5M) f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) Then follow the items listed in http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html for Cygwin. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com
2004 Oct 05
0
[LLVMdev] Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
Alex Vinokur wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. > > > My environment: > ----------------- > Windows 2000 > Cygwin > $ uname -srom > CYGWIN_NT-5.0
2005 Jun 13
0
[LLVMdev] problem compiling the cfrontend on Linux/PPC
Cyrille Mescam wrote: > Hi, > > > When compiling the cfrontend for Linux/PPC architecture on a powermac > G5, i got > the following error : I hate to ask a silly question, but are you using "make bootstrap" to build the cfrontend? Your output looks like gccas is being given a native code assembly language file to parse, and I seem to recall that that happens if
2004 Dec 28
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
"John Criswell" <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote in message news:4162A940.8090307 at cs.uiuc.edu... > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > >
2003 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Makefile.config&setenv
yue wrote: > hi, > about [LLVMdev] another question > > thanks > > yueqiang One other thing you might want to try is to put your object tree in a directory that is *not* inside of your source tree. Currently, we don't support using separate object trees that are subdirectories of the source tree. In other words: Will work: ========== SRC_ROOT=/home/yue/llvm
2004 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Services Restored
Dear LLVM Developers, The LLVM website, CVS repository, and SAFECode website should now be back online. Should you encounter any problems with the LLVM services, please send email to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu so that we may fix it. Regards, John T. Criswell ********************************************************************* * John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu
2004 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Services Restored
Hi, It looks like the CVS server is still not available. When I try to update with cvs, I get: cvs [update aborted]: connect to llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu(128.174.245.58):2401 failed: Connection refused I know the server was down earlier this week but according to the message below, its supposted to be restored by now. Could someone please help? Thanks, Reid. On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 14:30, John T.
2005 Jun 28
2
[LLVMdev] Re: llvm linux/PPC cfrontend
Cyrille Mescam wrote: > Morning, > > I would like to know if you received my mail with the assembly code > you wanted. > > It not, i'll send it again to you. > > Thanks for your help. > > Regards. > > Cyrille > I've looked into the files you sent me, and it seems that the problem is occuring due to the C library simplication pass (which is run
2007 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] Bug 1868: Specifying Pass Orderings
Devang Patel wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:01 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Devang Patel, >>>> >>>> In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to >>>> requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by
2004 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Server Back Up
Dear All, Our main server is back up, and all LLVM services (CVS, website, etc) should be up and available for use. If you notice that something is wrong, please send an email to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu. Thanks! -- John T. -- ********************************************************************* * John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu * * Research Programmer
2005 Nov 15
3
[LLVMdev] Moving CVS Files
Chris Morgan wrote: > Any reason not to upgrade to subversion? It does a much better job > with handling moved or renamed files although svn doesn't actually > store a 'move' or a 'rename' as a single versioned operation. We discussed moving to another revision control system about a year ago, if I recall correctly. At that time, we decided not to move to another
2003 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] how to solve it
hi, when I run "make -C ./llvm/test/Programs", it show following error: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at RH9 llvm]# make -C ./llvm/test/Programs make: Entering directory `/usr/local/llvm/llvm/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory
2005 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
Alexander Friedman wrote: > On May 17, John Criswell wrote: > >>Dear All, >> >>I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing >> the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. >> >>I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't >>have in house. I'm
2005 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM Release Branch
Dear All, Do people think that they are ready to create the LLVM 1.6 release branch? I believe all the development is pretty much done. Is all the documentation in the LLVM source tree updated and ready? I'm not able to make a full doc review like I've been able to do in previous releases, so I need volunteers to work on the docs if they're not done yet. -- John T. -- John
2005 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] Compile a linux kernel with LLVM?
ymxia at nudt.edu.cn wrote: > When I compiled a linux kernel, gccas was used to compile assembly code. > > But gccas cannot recognize the line comment character "#" of gnu assembler, > > and abort the compile with reporting a error "syntax error, unexpected $undefined". > > I watch llvm/tools/gccas, but donot known how to add this function in it. >
2004 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (firstuse this function)
Hi John, Please see below, too >From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:57:02 -0500 > >Henrik Bach wrote: >>Hi, > >Please see below. > >> >>I get this error: >>------------------ >>ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >>ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: (Each
2005 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] Current Regressions
Dear All, Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed below. Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few days ago have been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all who've helped fix things. We would like to try to get as many of these fixed as possible before I create the release branch (still scheduled for tomorrow, Friday). I'll
2005 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] Current Regressions
Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2005, John Criswell wrote: > >> Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed >> below. Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few >> days ago have been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all >> who've helped fix things. >> >> We would like to try to get as many