Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] another question"
2003 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] how to solve it
hi,
when I run "make -C ./llvm/test/Programs", it show following error:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[root at RH9 llvm]# make -C ./llvm/test/Programs
make: Entering directory `/usr/local/llvm/llvm/test/Programs'
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource'
make[2]: Entering directory
2004 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It
didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All
diffs are against the "native" output.
===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa
cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe:
84c84
< One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879153e+02.
---
> One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879156e+02.
2004 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:16:37 -0700
Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:52:10 -0700
> Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:
>
> > > I haven't got around to this yet but I will. The odds are good the
> > > problem is in a BSD system header file so I need to capture the
> > > preprocessed source.
> >
>
2011 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] About test suits
Hi sir,
I have built the test suits in following steps:
0. $cd LLVM_GCC_DIR; $gunzip --stdout llvm-gcc-4.2-*version*-*
platform*.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
1. $cd SRC_DIR/llvm-2.8/projects
2. $svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk test-suite
3.$cd OBJ_DIR; 4. $SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=INS_DIR --enable-debug-runtime
--disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols
2009 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM test-suite
2009/3/28 John Mosby <ojomojo at gmail.com>
> Thanks Duncan,
> I figured it out after a couple of tries, but the docs are not as clear as
> your instructions. If there's no specific maintainer of TestingGuide.html,
> I'd be happy to update the docs to be as clear as your instructions.
>
> llvm/projects/Makefile filters out "test-suite" and
2011 Apr 12
1
[LLVMdev] Problems with test-suite
Hello, all-
I am having trouble getting the test suite set up with my download of
SPEC2006. I downloaded and installed llvm-gcc, checked out a copy of
test-suite in llvm-2.8/projects, and then configured and made llvm:
./configure --enable-debug-runtime --disable-optimized
--enable-spec2006=/home/jamiemmt/speccpu2006 --with-externals=/home/jamiemmt
make
The configure script found the SPEC
2009 Feb 23
3
[LLVMdev] how to build llvm-test in separate directory
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
> Aaron Gray wrote:
> > I am trying to build llvm-test in a separate directory to the main llvm
> tree.
> >
> > I have put llvm and llvm-gcc's bin directories on the path but think I am
> missing a switch on the configure command.
> >
> You need to use --with-llvmsrc and
2009 Feb 07
3
[LLVMdev] Problem Running llvm-suite
Hi,
I'm trying to run the tests in llvm-suite, but I've run into trouble.
First, I had the llvm-suite checkout in a directory alongside the llvm
compiler checkout, but, when I ran "make" from llvm-suite, it complained
about there not being a Makefile two levels above it, so I moved
llvm-suite into the "test" subdirectory inside the llvm compiler
checkout. I ran
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
Tanya,
Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5)
HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS
* The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't
that be llvm-1.9?
* LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases
* I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4
binary
seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs.
*
2011 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] About test suits Cont
[qali at qali test-suite]$ make VERBOSE=1
if [ ! -f SingleSource/Makefile ]; \
then \
/home/qali/Src/llvm-2.8/autoconf/mkinstalldirs SingleSource; \
cp /home/qali/Src/llvm-2.8/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/Makefile
SingleSource/Makefile; \
fi; \
make -C SingleSource all
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/qali/build/llvm-2.8-rev/projects/test-suite/SingleSource'
if [ ! -f UnitTests/Makefile
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.
> Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite
> (make TEST=nightly report).
I tried to do this, but ran into trouble.
LLVM itself compiled fine.
GCC compilation is broken when Java support is enabled. I can file a detailed
bug report
2010 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite
Hi,
I'm using the release version of llvm 2.6. In the
llvm/projects/test-suite directory, there are several tests that are
commented out from running, or not running via a define statement. In
particular, I am inquiring about the status of the EH tests since some
tests seem to be enabled to run by default, but some aren't. From
looking at your tests, I've noticed the following:
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
Hello;
I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the
./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make
install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would
like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the
--enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with
llvmgcc source/binaries and I
2006 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing (TAKE TWO)
Hi Tanya,
Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are:
1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler
2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used)
BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3
* No issues, just the usual warnings.
BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3
* No issues
RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3
* The following failures were encountered. Some of them are
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
G'Day Tanya,
Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major
brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6?
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266
2009 Dec 12
4
[LLVMdev] Problem running 2.6 test-suite on cygwin
After following all steps from
http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#testsuiterun, I've got this:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/projects/test-suite/SingleSource'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests'
make[3]: Entering directory
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote:
>> point taken. thanks!
>
>
> Whatever I try I get something like this:
>
> ggreif$ cd MultiSource/
> ggreif$ make
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/
> burg.linked.rbc'. Stop.
> make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2
> make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2
This is the
2006 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
Hi Tanya,
I've been checking the state of the various llvm-test failures on
X86/Linux with GCC 3.4.6 and llvm-gcc4. I haven't finished this, but I
thought the following might be useful for other people that are testing
the release on Linux. Each group of failing tests below is followed by
a comment about why its failing.
llc /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
jit
2008 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > heisenbug wrote:
> > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
> > >>>