similar to: [LLVMdev] Re: how to solve following question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Re: how to solve following question"

2004 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] qmtest problem
I attempt install and use qmtest for run LLVM testsuit at FreeBSD, but without success. I have installed qm-2.2 (latest and single version accessable from http://www.codesourcery.com/qmtest/download.html in sources) When I start qmtest for LLVM ("make qmtest" in <llvm-obj-dir>/test directory - right?) error printed: ---8X---------------
2004 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] qmtest problem
Boy does THAT look familiar .. The problem is that you need an older version of QMTest, version 2.0.3 to be exact. The configuration of QMTest that LLVM uses won't work with 2.2 Reid. On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 10:53, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > I attempt install and use qmtest for run LLVM testsuit at FreeBSD, but > without success. > > I have installed qm-2.2 (latest and single
2004 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:49:44 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Jeff, > > Actually, that was my fault. I forgot to remove the non-existent > directories from the configure.ac file. That's done and committed > now, so the advice is still the same: update configure script :) > > Reid. OK, no problems building. I got some minor issues with the simple
2004 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 13:48, Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 10:49:44 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Jeff, > > > > Actually, that was my fault. I forgot to remove the non-existent > > directories from the configure.ac file. That's done and committed > > now, so the advice is still the same: update configure script
2004 Jun 09
1
[LLVMdev] Testing backend
Hi Reid, > The makefile for the feature tests is in the directory above. Simply: > > cd ~/llvm/test > make Feature.t > > This works for the regression tests to: > > make Regression.t Thanks, > The tests are run QMTest which just "knows" what to do with the test > file. In many cases there is a RUN: line which instructs the test > harness how to run the
2004 May 25
1
[LLVMdev] ATTENTION: SymbolTable Change!!
LLVMers, On the way to resolving bug 122, I am committing my SymbolTable rewrite. If you are working on anything that uses the SymbolTable, I suggest you read the documentation in include/llvm/SymbolTable.h. The changes I've committed reduce the use of Type::TypeTy. This static member will go away in the future, so please do not propagate new code that uses it. There is no reason to use it
2003 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Makefile.config&setenv
yue wrote: > hi, > about [LLVMdev] another question > > thanks > > yueqiang One other thing you might want to try is to put your object tree in a directory that is *not* inside of your source tree. Currently, we don't support using separate object trees that are subdirectories of the source tree. In other words: Will work: ========== SRC_ROOT=/home/yue/llvm
2003 Dec 24
1
[LLVMdev] Re: pthread?
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: > --------------------------------------------------- > [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll > Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol > _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > reference > -load request
2003 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] pthread?
Try llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll -pthread You have to link in the pthreads library, and I believe -pthread is all you need on a redhat 9 box. Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of yue > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:43 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] pthread?
2003 Dec 24
0
[LLVMdev] Re: pthread?
I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: --------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -load request ignored. Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn
2003 Dec 23
4
[LLVMdev] pthread?
hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from
2004 Nov 29
1
[LLVMdev] QMTest vs. Dejagnu
> > Cons of QMTest: > > 1) You have to use the gui to add directories. > > I think you're wrong. Manually creating a directory would work, as QMTest does > not place anything special in directories. I may have worded this poorly, but I think you have to use the gui to add new directories or tests, or specific tests. Otherwise, it does not know what to do with those
2003 Dec 22
2
[LLVMdev] hello.bc & binary code
hi, I try to build hello.cpp using both llvmg++ and GNU g++, the generate llvm bytecode's size is about 960K, and the size of binary code generated by g++ is only 13K. Could anyone explain the difference between the two result? BWT: I rebuild the cfrontend in RH linux9.0, but when I build the hello.cpp the llvmG++ reports warnings too, it shows: ----------------------------- [yue at RH9
2003 Dec 19
1
[LLVMdev] What different?
hi, when build test echo.cpp using "llvmg++ echo.cpp -o echo" it create an echo file, contain: ------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 Shootout-C++]$ cat echo #!/bin/sh lli \ -load=/usr/lib/libm.so \ $0.bc $* --------------------------------------- and using "llvmgcc echo.cpp -o echo-c", it creates an echo-c file, contain:
2003 Dec 19
1
[LLVMdev] how to solve this conflict
hi, when i build hello.cpp, it show following conflict: ----------------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 Shootout-C++]$ llvmg++ hello.cpp -o hello WARNING: Type conflict between types named 'struct._Unwind_Exception'. Src='{ ulong, void (uint, \4 *) *, uint, uint }'. Dest='{ ulong, void (ubyte, \4 *) *, uint, uint }' gccld: error linking in
2004 Nov 03
1
[LLVMdev] Problems with nighttest FeatureTests
Brian Gaeke wrote: > > A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem: > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/ > 020216.html > > John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error > checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error > less severe? Does the fork bomb occur in the
2003 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
why doesn't llvm transfer bytecode to RTL form? I mean the cross-platform compile in GCC. Could LLVM do that? maybe tree-ssa also create the representation with a testual format if needed. is it very difficalt? I want to know. BWT: if we port pthread library to llvm, what do we consider at first? yueqiang Chris Lattner wrote: >On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > > >>what
2004 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] QMTest vs. Dejagnu
Tanya Lattner wrote: > I've finished adding the -rundejagnu option to the nightly tester script, > which was the last step to fully support Dejagnu. I think now is the > appropriate time to discuss keeping QMTest or switching to Dejagnu. A lot > of work went into using QMTest, so I think we should make this decision > carefully and before the 1.4 release. > > Here are the
2004 Jun 09
0
[LLVMdev] Testing backend
Vladimir, The makefile for the feature tests is in the directory above. Simply: cd ~/llvm/test make Feature.t This works for the regression tests to: make Regression.t The tests are run QMTest which just "knows" what to do with the test file. In many cases there is a RUN: line which instructs the test harness how to run the test. On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 05:18, Vladimir Prus wrote:
2003 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] GCC3.5 tree-ssa
hi, what difference is between gcc3.5 tree-ssa and llvm? yueqiang 2003/12/24