similar to: [LLVMdev] Reverse Optimization?

I was sitting around thinking about making web applications, especially PHP based ones, perform better. While PHP has come a long way since its initial releases, it could still benefit from LLVM style "whole program" optimization. So, I had this radical idea. What if we built a PHP front end for LLVM so PHP programs could be LLVMized. What if we also built a i386 ELF front end so that

Yes, pretty much. There are a few things that will go in the std namespace because its the way it is and a more natural fit. The other two namespaces already in use (cl and DOT) will be placed under the llvm namespace. The goal is to get everything that is currently at top level and put it in llvm. This means that in your programs, you wouldn't use: cl::XYZ anymore but: llvm::cl::XYZ. Or,

Oops .. pardon my last incomplete posting, pushed Ctrl-Enter by accident! As I was saying .. Rahul's idea is interesting and would make some aspects of LLVM programming easier, but I wouldn't use it in my source language for the following reasons: 1. Of necessity the "snippet parser" would need to be based on the same language/grammar as AsmParser. Allowing parsing and

I have created a scaffold Admin/Radicals for doing CRUD. However, I''m not sure exactly where the scaffold uses the save() method. For a new entry, it creates form "radical" referencing method create(). The code for create() is as follows: def create @radical = Radical.new(params[:radical]) if @radical.save flash[:notice] = ''Radical was

I would also find this extension framework useful. Particularly, I would like to add intrinsics (without checking them into the LLVM source), and an "opaque" instruction which does not write to memory (and hence can be DCEliminated). Just a thought... Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:41:17 -0800 >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

First I would like to say thank you to HPA for providing some really nice features in recently syslinux version. About new functions, actually I have another radical idea, since we are in Asia, most of the users here they would like to see some local fonts for the syslinux/pxelinux menu. I am wondering is that possible, in the future, the syslinux/pxelinux menu can support CJK fonts or icon ?

Rahul, Were you talking about tracing in the sense of "profiling" (which Anand did), or tracing of values as they are computed for debugging generated code (which I did)? For tracing of values for debugging, the answer is yes: we insert code in each BB and print out the values computed in that BB that are live at the end of the BB (so we don't print out temporaries computed and

Hey rsync people, Here's a really radical idea and a possible future direction for the rsync project to explore. It occurs to me that tar and rsync are closely related in their purposes. "tar -c (blah) | tar -x" can be used to copy files; rsync's setup with a sender process and a receiver process is strikingly similar. The only major conceptual difference is that the rsync

Hello, I have observed that the LLVM build takes pretty long time to link executables (i.e. tools). Is that a normal behavior? Thanks, Rahul

>>> Hm... Maybe I'm biased by the Linux source code organization, but I'd rather see things like this: 1) Keep the code in core and com32 as generic as possible and just call some functions that have a BIOS and an EFI implementation. Like com32/modules/reboot.c would call a function that is implemented both in arch/{bios,efi}/lib/reboot.c, and the Makefiles link as

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:29:19 -0500 Steve Hideg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I've inherited a set of servers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux > Server release 5.9. They have some variant of samba 3.3 on them (e.g. > Version 3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2). These servers are using Samba and > Winbind as a way to bind to our Active Directory environment

It appears that lnt has the capability to run the SPEC2000/2006/2017(maybe) tests from looking at the options and from poking around in the mailing list archives. Or does it? I experimented a bit and cannot get it to work right. However, it isn't really documented anywhere so maybe I didn't set it up properly. Plus there's all the mention of llvmgcc... So is anyone doing

This fast-track covers the SMF-related changes for dom0. This is a final draft, so any comments by the end of the week please... Man pages are attached. thanks john SMF services for Xen 1. Introduction This case introduces the SMF services used by a Solaris-based domain 0 when running on Xen, or a Xen-compatible hypervisor. All of these services only run on domain 0 when booted

Hi LLVMdev, The stuff I am working on requires linking 9-10 LLVM libraries, along with a few libs of my own. The linker is taking a long time to do that, about 6 mins (on a P4 with 512 MB mem). I tried the latest (2.14) release of binutils, but that didn't help. Is anyone aware of any solution to this? Thanks, Rahul

Hi Sam, Thanks for your reply. I am implementing my research (http://www.it.usyd.edu.au/~suri/Detecting%20Buffer%20Over.pdf), a translation of LLVM to a simple non-deterministic language to detect buffer overflows. It involves (1) printing a control flow graph of basic blocks of a function (easily done) (2) translating each llvm statement to a corresponding data flow language (needs ASTs to

Creating looped pulldowns in PHP is simple so I can''t figure out why it seems to elude me in RoR. I want to create a simple pulldown list with the options and values "1" through "14." I have been trying to accomplish this with the .upto method like so: --START RHTML CODE-- <% options_array = [ 1.upto(14) {|i| print "[" i "," i "]"}

Hi, I wanted to share with the mailing list members here details about the project I've been working on: https://github.com/jeffreyhorner/R-Array-Hash This is a re-implementation of R's hashed environments, the global variable cache, the global string cache and symbol table with cache-conscious array hash tables. The results are quite encouraging. However, the implementation is a big

Okay, so I've now read 'man idmap_rid'. It states that the use of the base_rid parameter is deprecated, so does that change ID formula to this? ID = RID + LOW_RANGE_ID Assuming that the default value for the now-deprecated base_rid is 0. Following the example on the man page, I am going to try this: idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * :range = 1000000-1999999 idmap

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > I've actually got another, perhaps more radical, plan. Let's just get rid > of the C API or move it to another project. This simplifies a lot of the > plans here where people have too many different ideas of how the C API > should work. > > At this point the

I am new to more radical programming in R. I am trying to write a nested 'for' loop to produce output that takes subscripts like: for i taking values 1,2,3,4,5 and j taking values 1,2,3 I want to output for a computation using the combination values of i and j a value x like this; i j x 1 1 x11 1 2 x12 1 3 x13 2 1 x21 2 2 x22 2 3 x23 3 1 x31 3 2 x32