similar to: [LLVMdev] Question about Instruction comparison

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:13:04PM -0600, Tanya Brethour wrote: > > I have been looking over the doxygen documentation as well as the > > llvm code. Is there a standard way to check to see if two > > instructions are identical (i.e., Inst1 == Inst2 does not work)? > > If you want to check if two instructions are the same instruction, you > should be able to just

> I have been looking over the doxygen documentation as well as the llvm > code. Is there a standard way to check to see if two instructions are > identical (i.e., Inst1 == Inst2 does not work)? If you want to check if two instructions are the same instruction, you should be able to just compare pointers. -Tanya

Hi all, I want to find memory dependency between CallInst instruction and other. So i used the following code: * AliasAnalysis &AA=getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();* * if(isa<StoreInst>(inst1)){* * ** **if(isa<CallInst>(inst2))**{* * CallInst *call_inst2= dyn_cast<CallInst>(inst2); * * if(AA.getModRefInfo(inst1,call_inst2)==mod)**{* *

Hi James, Thanks for your quick reply. > I assume because you asked this question, something went wrong when using the above method. What was it? :) No, I am not using this method. I was trying to create a llvm::GetElementPtrInst . I didn't create IRBuilder. I am writing a ModulePass that insert new instruction to an existing Module. Besides, how can you get a reference to myreg1 ?

Thanks for the quick reply, Owen. I went through the code in MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp again. Since DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> maps a BasicBlock to a single Value (Instruction) and it is populated by a DFS on the reverse Control Flow Graph starting at the query instruction's block, is it correct to say that the last dependent instruction in each visited basic block is what is

Hi neda 8664, > I want to find memory dependency between CallInst instruction and other. So i > used the following code: > > > > / AliasAnalysis &AA=getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();/ > > /*if* (isa< StoreInst >(inst1)){ / > > // // /*if* (isa<CallInst>(inst2)) / /{/ > > / CallInst *call_inst2= dyn_cast<CallInst>(inst2); /

On 24 June 2014 01:55, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > On 06/19/2014 09:35 AM, Yi Kong wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm currently working on implementing ACLE extensions for ARM. There >> are some memory barrier intrinsics, i.e.__dsb and __isb that require >> the compiler not to reorder instructions around their

On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 15:03, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > > > 1. Name = llvmcc > > Why not 'llvmc' "llvm compiler"? What does the extra C

I'm posting this message in charge of Denis MARS (France), because he is not a subscriber of teh list and I worked with him about the same problem. Domenico Viggiani ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I worked on this problem since three weeks and now i really give up. Clearly i can't go further without your help. I hesitate to send you this bug

On Jul 28, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Prakash Prabhu wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about the memory dependence analysis. I am trying > to use it to selectively enumerate a set of pairs of (load, store) > instructions for every function by calling getNonLocalDependency() > on the MemoryDependenceAnalysis. This populates a > DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>. I just

Hi, You'd use an IRBuilder, like you did to create your LoadInsts. IRBuilder<> IRB(BB); IRB.CreateGEP(myreg1, myreg2); I assume because you asked this question, something went wrong when using the above method. What was it? :) Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Eduardo [erocha.ssa

Hi, I have a question about the memory dependence analysis. I am trying to use it to selectively enumerate a set of pairs of (load, store) instructions for every function by calling getNonLocalDependency() on the MemoryDependenceAnalysis. This populates a DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>. I just looked up an usage of this in GVN.cpp: MD->getNonLocalDependency(C, deps); for

Hi all, How can I create an llvm::GetElementPtrInst in which the pointer and the index are in registers previously loaded with llvm::LoadInst ? I mean, the generated instruction will be like this: %1 = getelementptr i8* %myreg1, i32 %myreg2 here, %myreg1 and %myreg2 are previously created by load instructions (llvm::LoadInst). Please, let me know if there is an example of something similar.

Hi Everyone, For your consideration: A proposal to improve regression test support for RuntimeDyld. Short version: We can make RuntimeDyld far more testable by adding a trivial pointer-expression language that allows us to describe how memory should look post-relocation. Jump down to "The Proposal" for details. Long version: Background: For those unfamiliar with it, RuntimeDyld a

Hello everyone, I wanted to copy a function from one file to another. The file that I wanted to copy the function into contains a function with the same name and same number of instructions. I decided to just replace the instructions with those of the other function. I am doing all of this from within a function pass. *1.* I created a function pass in which I extract a function using

Hi Dave, Jim Grosbach asked the same question, so you're in good company. With hindsight I think it was a mistake to say "FileCheck workflow". What I really meant was that this system plays well with lit. Not that your question about using FileCheck would have been any less valid. I did consider using FileCheck for this, but decided it was the wrong approach. The fundamental reason

I've got a suggestion for a refinement: Right now, we have classes like DILocation that wrap an MDNode* to provide more convenient access to it. It would be more convenient for users if instead of MDNode *DbgInfo = Inst->getMD(MDKind::DbgTag); Inst2->setMD(MDKind::DbgTag, DbgInfo); they could write: DILocation DbgInfo = Inst->getMD<DILocation>();

Actually, Misha, that won't work. The -C option is used directly in docs/Makefile. So the change will have to go into docs/Makefile. Either that or upgrade install to version 5. Reid. On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 11:33, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:21:20PM -0600, Feng Chen wrote: > > llvm[1]: Installing HTML documentation > >

Constant *strcon==ConstantArray::get("Value : %d\n"); Sorry Typo. On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 03:45:33PM -0700, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > > I have this call instruction to printf inserted which is causing > > an assertion failure. Any pointers to where I am wrong : > > > > Function

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:50:09PM -0500, Patrick Meredith wrote: > MetaSplit is an anlysis I just finished writing. It doesn't alter > anything, all it does is build a set of "program instructions". For > some reason even though if I run it with any other combination of > passes I've found, anytime I run it with mem2reg I get a seg fault in > dyn_cast!