similar to: [LLVMdev] Stacker

Hi all! I have sucessfully installed LLVM 1.9 under FreeBSD on a x86 PC. I have successfully executed "An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain" that is written in the document http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html When I tried out the demo projects "Hello" and "Stacker" I get compile errors. When I run "gmake" in the directory

If I remember correctly, you get the following warning when you configure LLVM: configure:2087: WARNING: Unknown project (Stacker) won't be configured automatically That leads would lead me to believe that you need to run configure inside llvm/projects/Stacker (and inside llvm/projects/Hello) before you run gmake inside of them. I don't know for sure, but perhaps that might fix

I'm also getting these errors: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/home/llvm/projects/Stacker' ../../Makefile.common:60: ../../Makefile.config: No such file or directory ../../Makefile.common:65: /Makefile.rules: No such file or directory gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `/Makefile.rules'. Stop. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/llvm/projects/Stacker' Everything else

Hi! In current LLVM CVS: llvm/projects/Stacker/Makefile.common.in llvm/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in llvm-java/llvm-java/Makefile.common.in have line: include $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/Makefile.common that have line: include $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/Makefile.config (also $(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/Makefile.config used in llvm-test/Makefile.config.in) and llvm/Makefile.config.in have lines: INSTALL_SH :=

Hello, I was wondering what happened to the "Stacker" example. The old link to it "http://llvm.org/docs/Stacker.html" is dead. Thanks, Wayne ________________ Wayne Anderson

On 2008-04-08, at 20:21, Lane Schwartz wrote: > I checked out the Stacker directory from svn, and put it in my llvm- > src/projects directory. Unfortunately, when I run make, I get the > errors below. I wondered whether the stacker code might simply be > out of date It is. The fixes are likely mechanical, but just require someone stepping up and submitting a patch. — Gordon

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of > autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like > install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the > projects rather than making the makefiles deal with them. I think in > most cases these are just historical artifacts

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 20:53, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of > > autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like > > install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the > > projects rather than making the makefiles

I have a "first version" of Stacker up and running. Structurally its a lot like llvm-as. When I run it, I get: Leaked objects found: after running pass 'Function Pass Manager' LLVM Value subclasses leaked: Note that the supposed list of "LLVM Value subclasses leaked" is empty. Its followed up by a SIGSEGV at AsmWriter.cpp:754 presumably because I have a BasicBlock

Personally, I don't think LLVM projects should need much in the way of autoconf stuff. They certainly don't need to replicate things like install-sh and mkinstalldirs. I'd vote for taking these out of the projects rather than making the makefiles deal with them. I think in most cases these are just historical artifacts that have been with the projects since long before the new

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > On 2008-04-08, at 20:21, Lane Schwartz wrote: > > > I checked out the Stacker directory from svn, and put it in my llvm- > > src/projects directory. Unfortunately, when I run make, I get the > > errors below. I wondered whether the stacker code might simply be > > out of

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Lane Schwartz <dowobeha at gmail.com> wrote: > OK. Thanks for the info. Is there a working sample project that I could look at? > > I'm interested in tinkering around with my own custom frontend for a > toy language, and I was hoping for something I could use as a template > in getting a project set up properly. Did you try the

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > I have a "first version" of Stacker up and running. Structurally its a > lot like llvm-as. When I run it, I get: > Leaked objects found: after running pass 'Function Pass Manager' > LLVM Value subclasses leaked: This is coming from the LLVM "LeakDetector" stuff. The idea is that you are not supposed to create

Hi, I'm new to LLVM, and I'm trying to get things set up. So far I've successfully gotten the C and C++ frontends to run, using the pre-compiled Mac OS X PPC binaries. I've also successfully compiled the main LLVM package (minus the gcc frontend). I'm now trying to get the Stacker sample project to compile. I checked out the Stacker directory from svn, and put it in my

Folks, I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you can provide it by early this coming week. For clarity, the -O options are currently defined

Hi, I do not know how to post in general again, however my csv contains around 5-250k data Points depending on vehicle/road type and pressure exerted on geotechnical structures. I have used R to develope histograms of said csv files and will attach such Picture to you in this mail and the csv used. Below I will type the R code I have used for this histogram.

All, I'm finding the current layout a bit frustrating, not to mention that it breaks all the documentation. We currently have modules laid out like this: llvm/trunk/... llvm/branches/... llvm/tags/... stacker/trunk/... stacker/branches/... stacker/tags/... and similarly for all the other modules (test-suite, java, poolalloc, etc.). Unfortunately, this "standard"

Hi, I'm very interested in the quality of the codes generated by LLVM. Has anyone done performance comparision among llvm, gcc, and native compilers on x86 or sparc for SPEC CPU2000 or other large benchmarks? thanks. Qiong

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to > get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O > family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting > your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you > can provide it by early this coming

Reid Spencer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 20:43 -0800, Wink Saville wrote: > >>> Try passing "-L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend" to llvm-ld. >>> >> This didn't work for me: >> llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a -L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend.a >> >> I get two warning's about library 'crtend' missing