similar to: [LLVMdev] event: maybe it is for LLVMers as well?

Hi, I'm trying to determine the phase of irregularly sampled data. Is there any particular reason why both spec.pgram and spec.ls return phase<-NULL for vectors? Thank you. Lisandro xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi Associate Professor in Ecology Department of Biology - University of Pisa Via

I am searching for an R version of the code written in GAUSS by Bruce Hansen for his paper on Econometrica, 2000, "Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation". Someone can help me? Davide -- Davide Fiaschi Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche University of Pisa Via Ridolfi 10 56100 Pisa (PI) Italy Phone/Fax: ++39.050.2216208/++39.050.598040 E-mail: dfiaschi at ec.unipi.it Homepage:

Dear List, how can I coerce a matrix like this [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [1,] "0" "1" "1" "0" "0" "0" [2,] "1" "0" "1" "0" "0" "0" [3,] "1" "1" "0" "0" "0" "0" [4,] "0" "0"

Dear R Fundation, I am a post-doc researcher at the University of Pisa, Italy. I apologize for my english and I have to tell you in advance that I am a very beginner with R. I used R for fitting dose-response curves (drc package) and for an ordinary ANOVA (one, two or three factors), including the post-hoc mean comparison (I used the LSD test...). Now I have to process some simple data on

Is it possible to have mail_max_userip set to a value for localhost (webmail) and to another value for everything else? Best regards Federico Bianchi Dipartimento di Storia delle Arti Universita` di Pisa via Trieste, 38 - I-56126 Pisa (Italy) tel.(+39) 050 221 6 024; fax (+39) 050 221 6 001 e-mail: <f.bianchi at arte.unipi.it>

Hello Reid and LLVMers, ... 10. Basic support for distributed computations. -- Best regards, Valery A.Khamenya mailto:khamenya at mail.ru Local Time: 19:48

The PC (Outlook) is accessing the mailbox via POP3, the iPhone is using IMAP; please consider we are talking about a user's home setup, so it's pretty difficult to have a more detailed report on his part (Outlook version, iPhone OS version, xDSL router type and configuration, etc.). The mail server 'dovecot -n' output is attached. The symptoms: when the Mail application is

Valery, That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Reid. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 >

On second thought, the makefiles don't (easily) allow this do they? You can only build one program per directory. Were you suggesting that you wanted me to move the entire directories under a "small examples" directory? Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On second thought, the makefiles don't (easily) allow this do they? You can > only build one program per directory. Were you suggesting that you wanted me to > move the entire directories under a "small examples" directory? You're right. The simples way to do this would be to have: projects/ SmallExamples/

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hello Reid and LLVMers, > 10. Basic support for distributed computations. What kind of support? What do you think should be included in LLVM directly, as opposed to being built on top of it? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Dear ALL, thank you for this sunday morning help! It works great! all the best, Simone Il giorno 30/nov/08, alle ore 11:22, Jorge Ivan Velez ha scritto: > > Dear Simone, > > Try this: > > x=c(1,1,2,3,4,3,2,2,2,1,2,3,4,4,3) > table(factor(x,levels=1:5)) > 1 2 3 4 5 > 3 5 4 3 0 > > HTH, > > Jorge > > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Simone

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs > repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Here's an idea: how about we take the ModuleMaker, Valery's previous example, and this one and put them all in one "small examples" project? -Chris > Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > >

Hi to all LLVMers first of all many thanks for new great LLVM release! now to the question. i was quite happy to look from time to time through regularly built benchmarking html-tables. now i cant easily find it anymore. In contrast to people, who just recently stuck to LLVM, I do know that these benchmarking tests did exist. they don't. i hope audience of ppl like me will be not forgotten

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

Hi LLVMers, the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible optimizations are really invoked. Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 on my Athlon XP 1500. Nice. P.S. guys, no fears, I don't plan to flood the cvs repository with my "brilliant" examples ;) --- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An

Google trends will display results for pretty much any query you can think of On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > see $subj > > http://www.google.com/trends?q=llvm > > congrats! > > P.S. sorry if known. > > best regards > -- > Valery A.Khamenya > _______________________________________________

Hello again Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > All benefits, what one could obtain from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at single host", one might obtaine from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at multiple hosts". Isn't that logical? I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on

Valery, I agree that there could be more examples of JIT-based interpreters, and I like your idea. When can you have it ready? :) Reid. On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 13:11, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi all, > > I think there is still too few docs/samples for those, > who'd like to write JIT-based interpreters. > > Today, the real examples to learn from are rather: > > -