similar to: [LLVMdev] Warning during compilation

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 How can I use std::string in my winemaker project? If I do a #include <string> along with an #include <windows.h>, I get the following errors: - --- In file included from /usr/include/c++/3.3/i486-linux/bits/c++io.h:35, from /usr/include/c++/3.3/bits/fpos.h:44, from

Hi, I am new to LLVM, so I am sorry if the question I am going to ask has already been raised before. I will be thankful if anyone can describe me a quick way to search relevant topics within the list archive, When I am trying to compile a simple code, containing access to std::string, with clang: #include <string> int main() { std::string s; return

I'm trying to build an app with clang against libraries that are using GCC 4.1 ABI. I'm getting an error "weakref declaration must have internal linkage" Now I'm stumped though, perhaps it is an incompatibility between clang trunk and gcc 4.1 include files? - I've built clang from trunk - fixed include paths to point to gcc 4.1 include paths When I modify clang to use

Hi list, Here it is: I have compiled with no problem courier-imap-4.0.4 on this arch (x86_64). Now I want to update my install with 4.0.6. I want to do this because the server is not yet in a production state, so if a major flaw affects courier-imap in the future, I could react more quickly. And indeed I'm encountering problems with the make process (Since I initialy build courier-imap

Hi, I can''t install eventmachine on Debian Lenny. ruby-dev and build-essential are installed. Where''s the problem? My (awful) logs: ============================= # gem i eventmachine Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing eventmachine: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /usr/bin/ruby1.8 extconf.rb checking for

At the last step of building llvm for arm target, I am unable to build llvm-gcc. I am trying the follwing options:   $ ../llvm-gcc/configure --target=arm-linux --enable-pic --program-prefix=llvm- --prefix=/llvm/install --disable-multilib --disable-optimized --enable-bindings =none --enable-llvm=$PWD/../llvm-2.8 --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstr ap   Then I get the following error when I

Dear R-users, As noted by Paul Murrell < p.murrell at auckland.ac.nz > there is errors in the code for polar plotting I send to R-help under the title "Polar plot, circular plot (angular data)" at Thu Oct 17 2002 - 12:18:20 CEST. Thanks! I have reorganized the code into a structure ('pp'). This allows plots to be modified to a greater extent by passing arguments by ...

Am 27.06.2000 19:58:44 schrieb urban: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 klaus-georg.adams@rwg.de wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > your patch from 2.2.15 to 2.2.16, backing out the older protocol levels breaks > > reading from an OS/2 LAN Server. > > The appended patch fixes things for me (against 2.2.16). > > This backs out a lot of desired changes. For example I think

This post is NOT a question, but an answer. For readers please disregard all earlier posts by myself about this question. I'm posting for two reasons. First to say thanks, especially to Dimitris, for suggesting the use of errorest in the ipred library. Second, so that the solution to this problem is in the archives in case it gets asked again. If one wants to run a k-fold cross-validation

Hello, I'm trying to use MC to assemble some code into a memory buffer. Whilst trying this, I ran into a segfault that I was able to reproduce using the llvm-mc tool (which makes me think it's not just me using the library incorrectly.) The bug looks like this (the binary is from a clean build of the 2.8 release): $ cat test/asm1.s movl %ebx, %eax $ ~/root/bin/llvm-mc --filetype=obj

Hi all, I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ -bw -- || "If wishes and buts were clusters of nuts, we'd all have a bowl of || granola!" - Mr. Jellineck

Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> writes: [snip] > 2) Problem: Complains about gthr-default.h file. > Resolution: Grab gcc/gcc/gthr-win32.h file and copy it to gthr-default.h ... so --enable-threads=win32 is broken... good to know. > 3) Problem: Complains about "CL_ObjCXX" and simular ("CL_") during > compilation

On Wed, 3 May 2006, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > You wrote Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 1:41:31 AM: > > CL> will fix it. If so, please let me know and I'll update my tree. If not, > CL> please get a stack trace of the failure so I can see where it is called. > Yes. This fixes the bug. ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL was defined in cygming.h > and seems to be platform specific. There

Hello, all. Just found this file in my e-mail atchive, hope it will be useful for somebody. ===cut=here=== Some small rules: 1) No blankspace in the paths to the top-level directories. 2) Add paths to binaries to your system PATH variable. 3) Use short paths to top-level directories. 1. Some checks & preparations. 1) Be sure, that you're using right make version: $ make

Okay, let's try this again. I've taken all the source and header files needed to build libstdc++ and libsupc++, and put together a small and very simple Makefile that automates the process. Anyone interested can grab the whole thing from here: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2 (101KB) Usage instructions: 1) Run GNU make: $ gmake This will produce dietstdcxx.bc

Hi all, Quick question: What is the best way to have multiple return values from a function? Would that be placing these into a structure and returning that to the caller? Thanks. -bw -- || "If wishes and buts were clusters of nuts, we'd all have a bowl of || granola!" - Mr. Jellineck

Chris Lattner wrote: } > I tend to agree. I'm a strong advocate of XML myself (on other } > projects). However, introducing XML would make LLVM dependent on some } > kind of XML parser. We could probably get away with expat (small, fast) } > for our purposes in LLVM, but there is still the issue of dependency. To } } To me, it's not a matter of "one more

Henrik Bach wrote: } Hi John, } } configure still exits, when checking for uint64_t. I've attached a patch, } that properly will fix it. Either uint64_t or u_int64_t will succeed: } } Index: configure.ac } =================================================================== } RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/autoconf/configure.ac,v } retrieving revision 1.106 } diff -u -r1.106 configure.ac } ---

Hi all, I had a quick question. I think it's possible to do this, but just wanted to make sure. It is possible to extend LLVM to add, say, matrix operations at a higher level and then "lower" them into some version of LLVM "proper" after performing any transformations on them, right? Also, it's possible to have any custom-made types (like "matrix") as well?

Hi Reid, > Since there's been little feedback on the design document I sent out, > some decisions are being made in order to progress the work. If you have > strong feelings about any of these, voice them now! > > 1. Name = llvmcc I like llvmcc, but really have no strong opinion. > 2. The config file format will resemble Microsoft .ini files > (name=value in