Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] i think this is a bug"
2003 Jul 22
1
[LLVMdev] this code won't assemble on sparc
Hi,
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here. With the single source file
attached to this email, I tried the following commands:
llvmgcc -o timeLLVMfft timeLLVMfft.c -lm
llc -o timeLLVMfft.s timeLLVMfft.bc
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xarch=v9 -o timeLLVMfft.sparc timeLLVMfft.s
I got the errors at the bottom of this email in response to the last
command. On the other hand, gcc v2.95.3 had
2006 Apr 16
11
[LLVMdev] 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing
I've put the pre-release tar balls here:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/
I'm asking for help to test this release and to review documentation. If anyone
can spare some time to help out, I would really appreciate it. The more people
that test, the better this release will be.
Secondly, now that the tarballs have been created, everyone is free to check in
documentation changes into the
2004 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver [high-level comments]
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> 2. MODE OF OPERATION
> ====================
> The driver will simply read its command line arguments, read its
> configuration data, and invoke the compilation, linking, and
> optimization tools necessary to complete the user's request. Its basic
I'm not sure that I agree with this. Compilers need to be extremely
predictable and
2009 Jun 17
1
[LLVMdev] Configure problem of llvm2.5 in Mac OS X 10.4.11
Hi,
I am trying to install llvm 2.5 in my PowerPC machine. I have already installed XCode Tools 2.4.1.
I can compile programs using gcc run them.
I try to configure llvm 2.5, the configuration aborts with following message:
checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0
checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0
checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0
2010 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM test-suite support for dragonegg / Fortran
Hi Tobias,
> I committed an extended version of that patch to llvm core and the test suite.
> Can you have a look, if it works for you.
if I configure like this then the configure script thinks llvm-gcc is not
dragonegg:
configure --with-llvmgcc="gcc-4.5 -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so"
--with-llvmgxx="g++-4.5 -fplugin=path/dragonegg.so"
There are several reasons for
2004 Jul 29
1
[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver [high-level comments]
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 11:26, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > 2. MODE OF OPERATION
> > ====================
> > The driver will simply read its command line arguments, read its
> > configuration data, and invoke the compilation, linking, and
> > optimization tools necessary to complete the user's request. Its basic
>
>
2002 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] problems with llvmgcc
Dear Prof. Adve,
Now I can use llvmgcc to compile a .c file into .bc file. But I still have
trouble simply run the .bc code. Below is the sequence I got when I tried.
I really don't know what's going on here. Please let me know how can I fix
it.
Thanks,
xiaodong
xli3|csil-suna48|~/cs426|[13]% llvmgcc scalarize.c -o scalarize
xli3|csil-suna48|~/cs426|[14]% scalarize
Cannot load value of
2002 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] problems with llvmgcc
Thanks, Chris,
Below is the output of 'llvmgcc he.c -v'
xli3|csil-suna27|~/cs426|[35]% llvmgcc he.c -v
Reading specs from
/usr/dcs/projects/cs426/Software/gcc_install/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/llvm/3.1/specs
Configured with: /home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc/configure
--srcdir=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc
--prefix=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc_install_sparc --target=llvm
--enable-languages=c
2002 Oct 29
2
[LLVMdev] problems with llvmgcc
Dear llvm,
I just tried to compile a simple file hello.c. But each time I used
llvmgcc hello.c, it gave me the following error:
xli3|csil-suna33|~/cs426|[13]% llvmgcc hello.c
as: error opening '/var/tmp//ccapglpE.o': file exists!
Use -f command line argument to force output
I really got confused. Could you please let me know what's wrong?
thanks,
Jerry
2004 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] opt, llcc, ll++, -O1, -O2, -O3
Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
>>For example:
>>$ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe
>
>
> BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy
> of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework?
>
> The invocation of
>
> $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe
>
> does not produce native assebler output as one might expect.
2004 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] opt, llcc, ll++, -O1, -O2, -O3
> For example:
> $ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe
BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy
of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework?
The invocation of
$ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe
does not produce native assebler output as one might expect.
--
Valery
2003 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] pthread?
Try
llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll -pthread
You have to link in the pthreads library, and I believe -pthread is all you
need on a redhat 9 box.
Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu] On
> Behalf Of yue
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:43 PM
> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: [LLVMdev] pthread?
2004 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] What differents between llvm-gcc and gnu
Hi,
When I compile httpd-2.0, llvmgcc reports many struct types and
macros undeclared, but gnu-gcc can compile httpd-2.0 completely.
2009 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] BuildBot Upgrade
Hi all,
Our buildbot at:
http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/
has been upgraded (it is also now linked from the front page). It has
a number of handy new features:
1. I imported the 'console' view used by Chromium into our version of
buildbot. You can see it here:
http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/console
This is experimental, but it seems to work well and once you learn to
read it it is
2004 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] opt, llcc, ll++, -O1, -O2, -O3
On Sat, 1 May 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote:
> there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations:
>
> 1.
> this document:
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html
> is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section
>
> An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain
>
> examples on optimization step.
That's an
2003 Dec 23
4
[LLVMdev] pthread?
hi,
I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it
show:
------------------
[yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll
[yue at RH9 test]$ ls
pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc
[yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll
Creating thread 0
WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function
instead!
ERROR; return code from
2004 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] PowerPC JIT available for testing
Le Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:00:03PM -0600, Chris Lattner écrivait/wrote:
>
>
> This is just a note to mention that the PowerPC JIT is now operational and
> begging for testing in mainline CVS. There is one known problem (below),
> but otherwise it works as well as the static PowerPC backend on the test
> suite. [....]
I'll be delighted to test it, but so fare I was not
2006 Apr 18
3
[LLVMdev] 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing
I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir.
Rob
On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>> For testing, we would like a mix of people to do x86 and ppc.
>> Please send email to the list if you plan to test, what
>> architecture, and if you will use the llvm-gcc binary or compile
>> it
2007 May 09
1
[LLVMdev] Problems with 'make check'
Hi Reid,
> Please note that the path is (purposefully) not used to locate test
> executables. Many of us have many LLVM environments and using the path
> leads to confusion. What the makefile is looking for is the LLVMGCC
> variable to be set. It wasn't so when substituted you get a null
> string which leads to attempting to execute "-emit-llvm" (the first
>
2004 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Patrick Flanagan wrote:
> I'm interested in getting LLVM running on OS X so I can play around
> with it and check it out. I downloaded the LLVM 1.2 package and
> compiled and installed with no errors (used config options
> --with-llvmgccidr and --enable-spec2000 pointing to the relevant
> directories). I want to look at performance of SPEC CPU2000 with LLVM