similar to: [LLVMdev] sys/unistd.h

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2005, John Criswell wrote: > >> Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed >> below. Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few >> days ago have been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all >> who've helped fix things. >> >> We would like to try to get as many

On 6/29/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Alexander Friedman wrote: > > Hi all, > > have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost > > no windows boxes have them. This requires either > > > > 1) Forcing the user to dowload flex/bison (bad) > > 2) Distributing flex/bison with the front-end (not as

From the ChangeLog: - dtucker at cvs.openbsd.org 2007/06/25 12:02:27 [atomicio.c] Include <poll.h> like the man page says rather than <sys/poll.h>. ok djm@ This was probably ill-advised given the history of this header file. Some older systems, and some not-quite-XSI-compliant systems such as QNX Neutrino, still have <sys/poll.h> but not <poll.h>. I

SUSv3 is silent on that definition, but seen several userspace software that expects flock to be defined in that file and complain that it is missing in klibc. Current declaration is in unistd.h. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> --- usr/include/sys/file.h | 9 +++++++++ usr/include/unistd.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I created a new block and inserted it into the present basic block list > , but I get this error: > > opt: BasicBlock.cpp:83: virtual llvm::BasicBlock::~BasicBlock(): Assertion `getParent() == 0 && "BasicBlock still linked into the program!"' failed. > > The program completes its task and i get this in the end. I am

On Fri, 13 May 2005, John Criswell wrote: > These following regression tests are failing (didn't mention these before > because they're easy to spot in nightly tester emails): > > FAIL: /Users/criswell/llvm/test/Regression/CodeGen/Generic/print-arith-fp.ll: > FAIL: > /Users/criswell/llvm/test/Regression/CodeGen/X86/fast-cc-pass-in-regs.ll: > FAIL:

Hi, It looks like the CVS server is still not available. When I try to update with cvs, I get: cvs [update aborted]: connect to llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu(128.174.245.58):2401 failed: Connection refused I know the server was down earlier this week but according to the message below, its supposted to be restored by now. Could someone please help? Thanks, Reid. On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 14:30, John T.

It's a shame this fine tool can't get better installation support for Windows. If it did I suspect it would get a lot more coverage. After 5 months or so I still have no way to compile the backend tools let alone the C frontend on windows. I have tried both Cygwin and Mingw so far. MingW is preferrable since distributions of the binaries would not require the cygwin.dll. It

Henrik Bach wrote: >> From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:38:52 -0500 > > >> >> When you run configure, you'd do something like this: >> >> configure --prefix=<...> LDFLAGS="-L<path where libdgbhelp is installed" >> >> If you modify Makefile.config directly, just add the

On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 17:33, John Criswell wrote: > What would be better yet is to modify the code so that it does not use > alloca() at all. There seems to be little reason to use it aside from > convenience (but perhaps I have missed something). I think the idea is that alloca can give (probably significant) performance gains when used properly. In the cases where you need

Dear LLVM Developers, The LLVM website, CVS repository, and SAFECode website should now be back online. Should you encounter any problems with the LLVM services, please send email to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu so that we may fix it. Regards, John T. Criswell ********************************************************************* * John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >> developer, >> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm framework. >> >> In Linux world, traditionally

Misha Brukman wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:20:48PM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > >>Personally, I never use "gmake check." >> >>What I do is checkout everything out, build it, run the tests in >>"llvm/test," and then run all of the tests in the llvm-test CVS >>module. > > > I think the nightly test script can be used for

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, John Criswell wrote: > >> Tanya Lattner wrote: >> >>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be >>> fixed though (see previous email). >> >> >> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). >> I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96

Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>For example: >>$ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > > BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy > of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework? > > The invocation of > > $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > does not produce native assebler output as one might expect.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, John Criswell wrote: >> 5. CVS doesn't support distributed development well. Tools such as Arch >> and Monotone work on a peer-to-peer basis. No one computer is "the >> repository". If the CVS server should ever go down (heaven forbid), we'd ... > How important do you (and others) feel this feature is? I see this as being a pretty big

Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: [snip] > >>Is anything with "Boost" in name will be rejected right away? > > > Absolutely not! We were using one of the boost libraries before and we > replaced it because it was easy to do and it removed one external dependency > for us, not because it had the "Boost" in name :-) > Another consideration is that we try

Thanks for the explanation. It's more clear now The only thing that seems strange is that in the function llvm_expand_shortcircuit_truth_expr in the front end, there is the creation of a PHI instruction. If there is no SSA yet, why do you do that? Thanks in advance --- John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Ricardo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been

>From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> >Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:11:03 -0500 > > >The DataTypes.h header file is generated by the configure script and placed >into your build tree. My best guess is that your system's header files do >not correctly define these macros, so they are missing. > I did a search on the build and source trees, but neither

On 4/30/13 1:10 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >> On 4/28/13 11:42 AM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> First of all, I didn't study on compiler too much, I'm a Linux kernel >>> developer, >>> Now I have one idea about compile kernel module by using llvm