similar to: [LLVMdev] clarify comment in BugDriver.cpp

When you run a program foo linked with gccld (i.e., by running the script "foo" it outputs which runs lli) it passes foo.bc instead of foo as the argv[0] for the program. This is surprising to the user, who is expecting that a program started by running "./foo" will call itself "./foo", not "./foo.bc". Fixed by removing ".bc" from the end of

gccld would barf if you tried to specify the full pathname of an archive on the command line to gcc, (e.g., instead of gcc ... -L/full/path/to -lFOO you say gcc ... /full/path/to/libFOO.a) which many GNU Makefiles try to do. This patch fixes that. Ok to commit? -- gaeke at uiuc.edu gccld.cpp: Fix typo in header. Add IsArchive static method. Roll LoadLibraryFromDirectory() into

Anton Korobeynikov pravi: > Hello, Ziga. > > >> VCPP throws a warning that class is previously declared as struct. >> Either it must be struct everywhere or class everywhere. >> Declaration uses struct, while the definition uses class. >> > Nice! However it will be better to do the opposite: have it struct > everywhere. I'll fix this. >

Hi, I am mounting an NT share from a linux(RH6.0) box using smbmount (samba v2.05a). smbmount //machine/cvsrepository /home/user/cvsrepository -U user I am trying to delete a read-only file in the mounted directory. The directory has proper write permissions: cd /home/user/cvsrepository mkdir blah cd blah chmod +w . touch test chmod -w test rm test rm: remove write-protected file `test'? y

See attached build (gmake -k) log. -- gaeke at uiuc.edu -------------- next part -------------- gmake[1]: Entering directory `/scratch/scratch0/gaeke/llvm-497cz/utils/Burg' gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/scratch0/gaeke/llvm-497cz/utils/Burg' gmake[1]: Entering directory `/scratch/scratch0/gaeke/llvm-497cz/lib' gmake[2]: Entering

Hello hackers, I seem to be having some trouble compiling the top of the llvm CVS tree... Is someone working on something involving IPModRef.cpp and the data structure graph? I have attached a make -k log. -Brian -- gaeke at uiuc.edu -------------- next part -------------- gmake[1]: Entering directory `/scratch/scratch0/gaeke/llvm-497cz/utils/Burg' gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for

I'm in the position where I'd like to offer IMAP access to a collection of email accounts which are stored in a very odd manner. Files are stored as: /blah/$dd-$mm-$yy/$domain/1234/1234 For example: /reject/12-3-2009/cvsrepository.org/35199/35199639 There is a single file for each mail, which I guess technically probably counts as an mbox folder, but only just. I

Whoops, I forgot to cc the list. Sorry. ----- Forwarded message from "Brian R. Gaeke" <gaeke at uiuc.edu> ----- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:35:34 -0600 From: "Brian R. Gaeke" <gaeke at uiuc.edu> To: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Headers & Libraries Hi Reid, Sorry I can't go into as much detail as your question did right

> I'm trying to get the demo script to run llvm2cpp so that people can get > familiar with the LLVM C++ API through the online demo. However, it > seems that the path used doesn't include llvm2cpp (not updated in a > while?). The demo script currently uses these paths on Zion: I can look into this, but I would strongly suggest not messing with the demo script until 2-3

Hello, I'm trying to get the demo script to run llvm2cpp so that people can get familiar with the LLVM C++ API through the online demo. However, it seems that the path used doesn't include llvm2cpp (not updated in a while?). The demo script currently uses these paths on Zion: /home/vadve/criswell/box/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/ /home/vadve/gaeke/llvm/Release/bin /home/vadve/gaeke/bin

Sorry, I don't personally have any of that stuff anymore -- I seem to recall that page didn't have a whole lot on it, though. I think Misha has messed around with llvm-tv more recently than I have. If you really want that particular page, it looks like you can get (a version of) it from the Internet Archive... http://web.archive.org/web/20041102220954/llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/~gaeke/llvm-tv/

Hi, Thank Brian Gaeke so much. Following TraceBasicBlocks.cpp, I modified the code as below and could insert instruction or function I need into anywhere in Module. But it works well without BB->getInstList().push_back(InstrCall), and if I add the BB->getInstList().push_back() following new CallInst(), I got error information when runing opt. What is the reason for it? And is it necessary

> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. > If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp > output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My > change was

It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My change was to help people learning LLVM

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Brian R. Gaeke wrote: > Sorry, I don't personally have any of that stuff anymore -- I seem > to recall that page didn't have a whole lot on it, though. I think > Misha has messed around with llvm-tv more recently than I have. If > you really want that particular page, it looks like you can get (a > version of) it from the Internet Archive... > >

> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. > > Do you want me to revert the changes? No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to maintain stability. -Tanya > > Reid. > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >>> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on

The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. Do you want me to revert the changes? Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > > output page. All other output is normal. So,

Okay, let me reiterate. The llvm2cpp option is *already* on the demo script page. If you choose that option, you just get an error message because llvm2cpp can't be found. Its harmless and everything else still works. I won't change the script for a couple of weeks, per Tanya's and your request. Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:48 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug

Hi, In the quest for better test cases for my MP, I thought of trying the Stepanov Abstraction Penalty benchmark. But apparently llvm-g++ is not ready for such terrible things. Let me know if you want me to send the source code (it is widely available). gaeke|csil-suna37|~/cs/426/MP1/step|[1177]% /usr/dcs/projects/cs426/Software/gcc_install/bin/g++ stepanov.cpp -o stepanov In file included from

Hi LLVM hackers, We'd like to call your attention to a spiffy new visualization tool for LLVM which we developed for a class project, which has just come to fruition. We call it LLVM-TV (the "Transformation Visualizer"). You're welcome to try it out -- it should build just fine on Linux or Mac OS X using a current CVS version of LLVM. Or, if you don't want to go to the