similar to: [LLVMdev] Building 'as' for Olden

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > Olden itself doesn't need it. _Compiling_ Olden requires the assembler to > turn llvm .s files into llvm .o files. Why not just use the bytecode > files that Misha posted? Right now I can't even get the LLVM assembly file to produce from Olden. The bytecodes that Misha posted are some ancient Olden version that doesn't work

does anyone knows how to get the Olden BM bytecode files? We're low on disk space and I don't want to build the whole test branch (even if i can, which I doubt, it failed last time i tried).

When I try to compile the olden bc's off the webpage I am getting undefined symbols. My compile script works as follows: #!/bin/sh echo "Generating assembly file." llc -f $1.bc echo "Assembling s file." /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xarch=v9 -lm $1.s -o $1 echo "Removing s file." rm $1.s and here is an example of the symbol issues: Undefined first referenced symbol

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > If you recompile the bytecode files now, (go into each directory and type > 'make final' they should be ok. Perhaps someone can do this and post the > results for everyone to use... I put up what I could compile here: http://tank.cs.uiuc.edu/Olden/ However, I could not get mst to compile: % make final dis: bytecode didn't read

I've also been trying to compile the Olden benchmarks in /test/Programs/MultiSource/Olden-* but to no effect. I just did a full CVS update -d on the llvm tree but when I try compiling say Olden-bh I get this error: gmake: *** No rule to make target `Output/args.rbc', needed by `Output/bh.linked.rbc'. Stop. We've also tried downloading the Olden benchmarks directly from the URL

> What exactly does Olden require from 'as'. I can't build the entire 'as' > because there's no more disk space left. Olden itself doesn't need it. _Compiling_ Olden requires the assembler to turn llvm .s files into llvm .o files. Why not just use the bytecode files that Misha posted? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

The new Olden benchmark bytecodes Misha generated are in the standard place: > Perhaps Chris could copy them into the standard place? Done: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/LLVMPrograms/Olden -Chris > > The files I linked to the second time > > (http://tank.cs.uiuc.edu/Olden) are hot off > the presses: I > > compiled them just recently today. So far, only 2 of them give me

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > For each bmk, the undefined symbols are coming from args.c as far as I can > > tell. Do I need to link in args.c's bc file for each of them or am I > > doing something terribly wrong? > > These benchmarks were compile a long time ago in a galaxy far far away. > In this galaxy, uninitialized globals (int X;) were handled

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Juan Nicolas Ruiz wrote: > does anyone knows how to get the Olden BM bytecode files? http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/LLVMPrograms/Olden/ -- Misha Brukman :: uiuc.edu/~brukman

I'm the guy who is working on the LLVM bytecode documentation. The document I have at present just supports the bytecodes my code generator processes, though, which is far from all of them. As I get farther along with my code generator I expect I'll get to the point where everything kind of fits together for me and I can finish it up. In the meantime, people are welcome to what I have

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:25:23AM -0800, Robert Mykland wrote: > I'm the guy who is working on the LLVM bytecode documentation. The > document I have at present just supports the bytecodes my code > generator processes, though, which is far from all of them. As I get > farther along with my code generator I expect I'll get to the point > where everything kind of fits

Ok. Let's say I have a GetElementPtrInst that is used to access structure elements. In this case the indexes will be constants and I want to get the constant values as an a native C int. Now I can iterate over all the indexes with idx_begin(). I can cast all of the indexes to a ConstantIntegral. However, I cannot cast the indexes to a ConstantSInt or ConstantUInt (cast<> throws an

The following should work: % cd llvm/test/Programs/MultiSource % gmake DISABLE_CBE=1 DISABLE_LLC=1 --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu > [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Juan Nicolas Ruiz > Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 2:20 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] Olden BM

> Also sprach Wojciech Stryjewski: > } Ok. Let's say I have a GetElementPtrInst that is used to access > structure > } elements. In this case the indexes will be constants and I want > to get the > } constant values as an a native C int. > } > } Now I can iterate over all the indexes with idx_begin(). I can cast > } all of the indexes to a ConstantIntegral. However,

I updated the latest "poolalloc" code and the problem seems to have been fixed. However, I am still having problem of running "poolalloc". After compilation finished, there are several dynamic libraries created (libpoolalloc_rt.so, libpoolalloc_fl_rt.so and LLVMDataStructure.so). I was not sure which one I should use so I just tried all of them with "opt -load".

Hello; I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the ./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the --enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with llvmgcc source/binaries and I

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I am compiling SPEC 2000 benchmarks with llvm .Got stuck with > calculating "execution time" of all the .bc and native files. > > The log for nightly test itself gives execution times but I am passing > the bytecode files to my pass which gives another bytecode file.I have > to calculate execution time of such bytecode and

Hi! There's nothing on the calendar for this month? Anton just mentioned to me that it was today, so just trying to clear up some confusion. Thanks, Joey On 12 September 2012 04:12, Wojciech Meyer <wojciech.meyer at gmail.com> wrote: > Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> writes: > > > Just a reminder, the Cambridge LLVM Social is this Wednesday, 7:30pm >

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Wojciech Daniło <wojtek.danilo.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > I will take a look into NVPTX. > > I don't want to deconstruct C++ classes to generate Python code - I want to > generate Python backend :) > Its purpose is to be able to generate Python code from LLVM IR code (not C++ > code! - C++ code is needed for me only to get a sample IR

We have a project that calls for the creation of a list of many distribution objects. Distributions can be of various types, with various parameters, but we ran into some problems. I started testing on a simple list of rnorm-based objects. I was a little surprised at the RAM storage requirements, here's an example: N <- 10000 closureList <- vector("list", N) nsize = sample(x