similar to: [LLVMdev] steensgaard

When I try to compile the olden bc's off the webpage I am getting undefined symbols. My compile script works as follows: #!/bin/sh echo "Generating assembly file." llc -f $1.bc echo "Assembling s file." /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xarch=v9 -lm $1.s -o $1 echo "Removing s file." rm $1.s and here is an example of the symbol issues: Undefined first referenced symbol

I must be doing something dumb, but I'm having trouble running the example hello transformation. It is printing "pure virtual method called." All I am doing is checking out a new llvm, compiling it with gmake -k, compiling Hello with gmake, and running: opt -load ../../../lib/Debug/libhello.so -hello < hello.bc > /dev/null where hello.bc is the hello world program. From

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 03:19, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > > > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > > external global variables( and so inComplete ), > > Sounds right! > > > the call to printf will > > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > > > Am I right ? :) >

Hi Chris, I took a haste look at the "Points-to Analysis in Almost Linear Time" by Steens , your PHD thesis and SteensGaard.cpp in LLVM this afternoon. So I think: 1. Actually the basic algorithm described originally by SteensGaard does not provide MOD/REF information for functions. 2. The context insensitive part of Data Structure Analysis (LocalAnalysis) can be deemed as an

Hi, LLVM dev team: Thanks for your suggestion, I have done the experiment to compare the two pointer analysis(Andersen and Steensgaard) methods in LLVM, but the result was unexpected. In each test, I compare these two methods using same optimization; There are several tests, each with a different optimization. The benchmark is all the 11 C programs in CINT2000 of SPEC. In all the tests, I found

Hi, LLVM dev team: Thanks for your suggestion, I have done the experiment to compare the two pointer analysis(Andersen and Steensgaard) methods in LLVM, but the result was unexpected. In each test, I compare these two methods using same optimization; There are several tests, each with a different optimization. The benchmark is all the 11 C programs in CINT2000 of SPEC. In all the tests, I found

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > external global variables( and so inComplete ), Sounds right! > the call to printf will > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > Am I right ? :) If you've tested it then, yes you're right :). I haven't played with this stuff for a long time,

Hi, I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel version I used is 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. My question is what version of Linux kernel LLVM has been tested on successfully? To run DSA analysis, should I use the

I have a sort of strange request -- I am splitting up a program into multiple threads, which may have duplicated instructions between them. I'd like to run optimizations on the threads separately, but I'd like for the variables common amongst the threads to get register allocated the same way (i.e, a value that is duplicated in the two threads gets mapped to the same register/memory

I noticed that the open projects lists porting glibc to LLVM. I was wondering if anyone was working on this currently. If no one is on it, does anyone have an idea of how nasty this would be to do? I'd like to have LLVM output to a new ISA, it'd be great if all I had to do was proxy system calls like read and write in my architectural simulator. -- Francesco Spadini

> Note that compiling glibc with LLVM does not give you a solution to THIS > problem: you'd still have to write a new backend for your ISA. There is > currently a Sparc backend and an X86 backend. Depending on how similar > your architecture is to one or the other, you might be able to leverage > existing code. Take a look at llvm/lib/Target/{Sparc,X86}, though the > X86

HI guys. I'm trying to build the poolalloc on llvm-2.0 but there exist some errors. Can you tell me which version of llvm is known to make the poolalloc build and install successful? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070710/4ab5e155/attachment.html>

On 9/13/07, Haifeng He <hehaifeng2nd at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel > version I used is > 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do > DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have > filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. It is possible there was a

聪明陈 wrote: > Hi LLVM dev team: > I am now doing an experiment to comparing Steensgaard-style and > Andersen-style pointer analysis on LLVM. Since steensgaard pointer > analysis is in module "poolalloc", so I installed poolalloc release > 2.6 on my machine(intel X86_64 RedHatEnterpriseLinux 5.1, gcc-4.2.4), > two directories "include" and "lib" were

Hi LLVM dev team: I am now doing an experiment to comparing Steensgaard-style and Andersen-style pointer analysis on LLVM. Since steensgaard pointer analysis is in module "poolalloc", so I installed poolalloc release 2.6 on my machine(intel X86_64 RedHatEnterpriseLinux 5.1, gcc-4.2.4), two directories "include" and "lib" were created after installation but no

Hi Daniel, To my knowledge, there is no other implementation available for Steensgaard AA except poolalloc. I have tried Steensgaard AA under LLVM 2.7 poolalloc, but there are lots of bugs which need to be fixed. It will be a good idea to use previous implementation, but you will have to modify (a lot) it with respect to the latest version of LLVM poolalloc. Thanks, -Yogesh -------------- next

Hi all. How does one change user agent strings in http requests made in R? And how do I figure out what my current user agent string looks like? Thanks in advance, Soumendra -- Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?--- ?Howard Aiken

Hi, This is Jiesheng Wei from UBC. Now I am working on a project with LLVM and I want to use steensgaard alias analysis tool. I saw on the website that steensgaard analysis is available for LLVM 2.9 and it is under poolalloc/ directory. I downloaded several versions but none of them is compatible with LLVM 2.9. Can you please tell me which version of poolalloc is for LLVM 2.9? Thanks, Jiesheng

On 10/7/11 11:56 PM, Jiesheng Wei wrote: > Hi, > > This is Jiesheng Wei from UBC. Now I am working on a project with LLVM > and I want to use steensgaard alias analysis tool. I saw on the website > that steensgaard analysis is available for LLVM 2.9 and it is under > poolalloc/ directory. I downloaded several versions but none of them is > compatible with LLVM 2.9. Can you

On 9/9/09 3:28 AM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Lei Shang<shang1982 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just found -steens-aa and -ds-aa Alias Analysis listed in documents do >> not exist in my llvm-2.3 code. Both from opt -help and the lib/Analysis. >> And then I go to download the llvm-2.5 version, there is still no