similar to: [LLVMdev] WRT: function pointers + DSG

Test Cases: (attached) Iteration code: (...) typedef TarjanSCC_iterator<CallGraph*> MyTarjan; CallGraph& callGraph = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); MyTarjan iter = tarj_begin(&callGraph); MyTarjan end = tarj_end(&callGraph); while(iter!=end) iter++; (...) if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter traverses, it never reaches main...

Thanks, I've been through the documentation, and if I visit main, i think everything will turn out correctly... Printing out the Call graph reveals that main is calling this external node i think you are making reference to. Could this be the problem? Dave On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter >

Is there a facility with which we may automagically create a "fake" exit node, one that is the target of all BasicBlocks ending in return. This would be very helpful to IP dataflow analysis... Dave

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Anand Shukla wrote: > There is a pass "UnifyFunctionExitNodes()" (you can add it to AnalysisUsage > of your pass) that does the trick. Yup, just like Anand says, this pass will make it so that there is at most one exit node from the function, which you can use for your analysis (it will even tell you which BB that is too). Note that a function may _not_ have

> if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter > traverses, it never reaches main... Ok, first note that the CallGraph class does really stupid (but correct) things for function pointers, so you're not going to see anything remarkably nice here... Make sure to read the CallGraph.h comments to understand exactly what is going on. Despite that, I can verify

We''re starting to collect several comments for doc revisions, which is = great. Another existing source of comments and suggestions is the list = archives. Would someone be willing to spend an hour or two to (1) search = the list archives for documentation issues/suggestions, perhaps using = search terms like: docs, documentation, instructions, Quick Start, = samples, etc., and (2)

Hello, Is it possible to display the data structure graphs created by the Data Structure Analysis using a visualization tool? Thanks --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, xavier wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to display the data structure graphs created by the Data Structure Analysis using a visualization tool? yes. Just run one of these commands: analyze -datastructure x.bc -- local DSGs analyze -budatastructure x.bc -- BU DSGs analyze -tddatastructure x.bc -- TD DSGs These commands will output one

Hello,I was using the ResetCDR() right after my IVR answered the calls to set them unanswered until or if somebody pick up the callI just upgraded to version 1.4.19.1 and now ... when the ResetCDR() function is called it seems to just erase the recordIs there another to set the status of the call unanswered ? is it a bug ?Thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Dear LLVM, when I tried to use the TarjanSCCIterator. I include the header file and compile the program. It give me this warning: Compiling MemLeakage.cpp In file included from MemLeakage.cpp:28: ../../../include/Support/TarjanSCCIterator.h:59: warning: left shift count >= width of type ======= Linking MemLeakage debug library ======= Please let me know if this is a problme in the

Hello, I'm considering creating an LLVM backend for a 16 bit processor and modelling it around the (experimental) MSP430 back end. When reviewing MSP430InstrInfo.td I see def MSP430Wrapper : SDNode<"MSP430ISD::Wrapper", SDT_MSP430Wrapper>; and can see in MSP430ISelLowering.cpp that ISD::GlobalAddress: ISD::BlockAddress: ISD::ExternalSymbol all get lowered to

Hi All, We have recently found some optimization opportunities created by replicating code into branches in order to enable optimization. In general, the optimization opportunity we are pursuing is like the following. Given pseudo-code: // block A if (some condition) // block B // block C If it can be efficiently proven that some portion of block C can be simplified had control flow not

Hi, I want to clone a given function, and add an argument to it. I then want to add a call to that new function. I have a callInstruction CI, which I want to transform to call this new function, and to take a new argument. The code I added was as follows CI->getCalledFunction()->dump(); Function* DirectF = CloneFunction(CI->getCalledFunction());

Hi all, I know I shouldn't really expect the following to work, but it provokes a crash of the GUI on my computer (Win xp professional). --- >sessionInfo() Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01) i386-pc-mingw32 attached base packages: [1] "methods" "stats" "graphics" "grDevices" "utils" "datasets" [7] "base"

I use the following code to do the depth first search on the DSGraph. And I always got this error message. Couldn't figure out what's wrong. Could you please let me know? Besides, I really have no idea about what those functions do. Is there any documentation about DSGraph functions besides the pool allocation paper? Thanks, xiaodong Code: for( df_iterator<DSNode*> I =

On 25 Jul 2012, at 04:49, Paul Shortis wrote: > Hello, > > I'm considering creating an LLVM backend for a 16 bit processor and > modelling it around the (experimental) MSP430 back end. > > When reviewing MSP430InstrInfo.td I see > > def MSP430Wrapper : SDNode<"MSP430ISD::Wrapper", SDT_MSP430Wrapper>; > > and can see in MSP430ISelLowering.cpp

Hi, all I want to create a function in LLVM IR, whose type is: void _to_prof( FILE* ptrF); I do it within LLVM, but I don't know how build the parameter type for FILE* ptrF. Best Regards. Eric Lu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140627/c49bdb2a/attachment.html>

cvs co llvm ... cd llvm; ./configure --with-llvmgccdir=<llvmgccdir>; make ... Compiling llvmAsmParser.cpp Linking /home/dcrowe/llvm/llvmcvs/llvm/lib/Debug/asmparser.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dcrowe/llvm/llvmcvs/llvm/lib/AsmParser' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dcrowe/llvm/llvmcvs/llvm/lib/Bytecode' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop. make[2]:

Dear LLVM, Recently I incorporated code into my project such that function pointers were supported, however it seems that the TarjanSCC_iterator no longer works on the call graph... main() is no longer reached while the function pointers are... I can provide code, but I have a feeling there is a simple fix... Has anyone gone through this? Thanks, Dave

> Recently I incorporated code into my project such that function pointers > were supported, however it seems that the TarjanSCC_iterator no longer > works on the call graph... main() is no longer reached while the function > pointers are... I can provide code, but I have a feeling there is a > simple fix... Has anyone gone through this? I'll need some more details before I