similar to: [LLVMdev] Function Formal parameters

Valery, That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Reid. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 >

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs > repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Here's an idea: how about we take the ModuleMaker, Valery's previous example, and this one and put them all in one "small examples" project? -Chris > Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > >

On second thought, the makefiles don't (easily) allow this do they? You can only build one program per directory. Were you suggesting that you wanted me to move the entire directories under a "small examples" directory? Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On second thought, the makefiles don't (easily) allow this do they? You can > only build one program per directory. Were you suggesting that you wanted me to > move the entire directories under a "small examples" directory? You're right. The simples way to do this would be to have: projects/ SmallExamples/

Valery, Your JIT sample program has been added to projects/HowToUseJIT. I have defaulted the license to the standard UIUC license. Let me know if that's not okay and I'll fix it. If you continue to work on this (providing a command line option to use either interpreter or JIT would be nice), please provide patches against these files and I'll commit them for you. Here's the

Hi LLVMers, the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible optimizations are really invoked. Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 on my Athlon XP 1500. Nice. P.S. guys, no fears, I don't plan to flood the cvs repository with my "brilliant" examples ;) --- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi, I am trying to insert a Loop IR into the existed bytecode file. insertion part by C code, char *p[n]; // pointer array for storing the address of strings int i; for(i=0;i<n;i++){ (p[i])[2] = (p[i])[2] ^ 0x27; } My questions are 1. for local variable 'char *p[n]' , it is represented by IR as alloca ...., so could I insert local variable (pointer array) directly as same way

Scott Ricketts wrote: > I would like to instrument certain function calls with a function call > of my own that takes some of the same arguments. For example, I would > like to instrument calls to free with some function foo, so the C code > would look like: > > foo(myarg1, myarg2, ptr); > free(ptr); > > The problem occurs when I grab the arg from the free function and

Reid Spencer, thank you for your quick responce, finally i got to my PC at home. You wrote: > Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, > "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and > "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences > should be instructive on what to do. You were

I would like to instrument certain function calls with a function call of my own that takes some of the same arguments. For example, I would like to instrument calls to free with some function foo, so the C code would look like: foo(myarg1, myarg2, ptr); free(ptr); The problem occurs when I grab the arg from the free function and try to pass it to foo... if (isCallToFree(&I)) { Value*

Does ActiveRecord.connection.execute(string) perform any modifications on the given string? If so, what quoting do I need to add? Here''s why: I''m trying to use execute(string) to load a stored procedure. I can hand-load the procedure without error (i.e. via dbconsole), but when I call the function below, it throws the error: ==== ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error:

Hi I'm trying to build the perl modules of net-snmp-5.4.2. Everything seems to work fine until "make test"[1]. The problem with "DynaLoader.pm" seems to be an old one. The machine is Centos 5.2 i386 I'm trying to build instead of using the one available in the repos because I'll build in other platforms and also in nagios-plugins. Thanks Marcelo [1]

Thanks Antont and Gabor.. I will use the iterator instead.. On 5/11/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote: > Hello, Ferad. > > > I switched to the upcoming version 2.0 branch and porting my code from > > 1.9. Thanks there is not a lot to do. I found that > > Instruction::getNext and Instruction::getPrev are private. Is this > > intentional? >

Hi, I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of failure? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt Here's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb) where #0 0x0853d606 in

Dear llvm-devs, we discussed a consistency issue with the naming of iterators in the #llvm IRC channel and I came up with a patch to Module.h and Function.h. The patch renames the aiterator family of typedefs to arg_iterator in Function and correspondingly giterator and friends to global_iterator. The accessor functions also change accordingly. Right now the old spellings are preserved, but

Valery, Attached are three files: "valery.cpp" which contains your original, "reid.cpp" which contains corrections to most of the FIXME items and "diffs" which shows the differences between them. The differences should be instructive on what to do. You were really, really close .. just a few details changing. The code in "reid.cpp" compiles but I

Hi, I switched to the upcoming version 2.0 branch and porting my code from 1.9. Thanks there is not a lot to do. I found that Instruction::getNext and Instruction::getPrev are private. Is this intentional? If yes, what would you recommend instead using them? Thanks, Ferad

Hi all, I am finding a SEGFAULT in one of my passes when using getPrevNode on an instruction that is the only one in a BasicBlock. I was expecting getPrevNode to return 0 in that case (as per docs), but it breaks. I guess the code in in ilist_node.h: NodeTy *getPrevNode() { NodeTy *Prev = this->getPrev(); // Check for sentinel. if (!Prev->getNext()) return 0; return Prev; }

Dear All, Given a pointer to an instruction, what is the easiest way to insert one or more new instructions after that instructions? We used to find the next instruction using Instruction::getNext(), but this method seems to have been made private now. -- John T.