similar to: [LLVMdev] Breakage in CVS?

On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from > > vmap, the ScalarMap... > > int count = 0; > > std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); > > Are you sure "theGraph" is not null at this point? yes... that call returns sucessfully. the segfault

> The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from > vmap, the ScalarMap... > int count = 0; > std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); Are you sure "theGraph" is not null at this point? -Chris > for (std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>::iterator i = vmap.begin(); i > != vmap.end(); ++i) { >

> ...... > DSGraph* DSG = getAnalysis<BUDataStructures>().getDSGraph( F ); > std::map< Value*, DSNodeHandle> scalarmap = DSG->getScalarMap(); > ...... > > The scalarmap is always empty. I printed the size of the map which came > out to be zero always. But the getNodeForValue works correctly for the > same DSG, which means that the scalarmap cannot be

> I tried to used the getScalarMap function of the DSGraph to get the nodes > that the scalars point to in a function. But the getScalarMap returns a > null map always. Is there any problem in the getScalarMap function or is > there any "protocol" to be followed while using the function? DSGraph::getScalarMap returns a reference to the map, so this cannot be null. Do you

> > > The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from > > > vmap, the ScalarMap... > > > int count = 0; > > > std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); > > > > Are you sure "theGraph" is not null at this point? > yes... that call returns sucessfully. the segfault occurs after...

Chris, We tried that too...but still it returns an empty map. We also saw that Scalar Type has been removed from the DSNode types. Why is that? Thanks, Ganesh On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > ...... > > DSGraph* DSG = getAnalysis<BUDataStructures>().getDSGraph( F ); > > std::map< Value*, DSNodeHandle> scalarmap = DSG->getScalarMap(); > >

> We tried that too...but still it returns an empty map. I'm not sure what's going on then. :) I think that Vikram is planning to update CVS soon, you might try that, as there has been significant updates. I'm not sure why getNodeForValue would work for you but getScalarMap doesn't... getNodeForValue USES the scalar map! :) > We also saw that Scalar Type has been

Specifically we did the following: ...... DSGraph* DSG = getAnalysis<BUDataStructures>().getDSGraph( F ); std::map< Value*, DSNodeHandle> scalarmap = DSG->getScalarMap(); ...... The scalarmap is always empty. I printed the size of the map which came out to be zero always. But the getNodeForValue works correctly for the same DSG, which means that the scalarmap cannot be empty.

Is it correct that there is no way of avoiding deep copying of data structures? Or asked from a different perspective, is it true that there are no pointers? :) (not that I am a fan of pointer, they just let me decide when to do deep copy on my own when the memory manager doesnt do it for me :) ) I was considering writing code in R that would need the internal representation of complex graph

Hi, though DSA isn't maintained in the current build, I need to use it for analyzing dependencies among functions. Therfore I load the EQTDDataStructures pass and retrieve the mapping from nodes int the callee to the ones in the parent DSGraph with computeNodeMapping. In most cases this works well, but for some function calls I get following error: DSGraph.cpp:1379: static void

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Zvonimir Rakamaric <zrakamar at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks guys! > > I was looking into ModRef before, but I don't think that's exactly > what I need. ModRef API call getModRefInfo requires a Value to be > passed to it. However, some memory location M (which is a <DSNode, > offset> pair) visible to the caller can be modified

Hi, I am not exactly sure what causes your error. But if you have a reduced test case we can try looking at it. Thanks, Arushi Hello, i wrote a little pass. It tries to identify every call- / invoke-instruction recursively and calls computeCalleeCallerMapping for each. The sample program just creates a vector of integer and adds an element to it. Do you know what's wrong? Best,

Thanks guys! I was looking into ModRef before, but I don't think that's exactly what I need. ModRef API call getModRefInfo requires a Value to be passed to it. However, some memory location M (which is a <DSNode, offset> pair) visible to the caller can be modified in the callee without any Value in the caller actually pointing to that location. I also need to capture those... I

1. What is the difference between DSNodeHandle and DSNode? What do the functions getLink() and getSize() do? 2. In the previous email, you mentioned that we can use DSNode::getPointerSize() to get the number of links, But I checked the doxygen documentation, there is no such member for DSNode. 3. Previously I use the following code: for( df_iterator<DSNode*> I = df_begin(pnode),

LLVM, What do I pass into the DSG in order to access the globals vector of functions that a function pointer may be calling. The code: CallInst *calli = dynamic_cast<CallInst*>(*i); std::vector<GlobalValue*> funcVect = theGraph.getNodeForValue(calli->getCalledFunction()).getNode()->getGlobals(); Doesn't appear to work... getCalledFunction() returns 0 Dave On Fri, 6 Dec

Dear Prof. Adve, I recently checked out the llvm using cvs update command under the llvm directory. But when I went to see the DSNode.h, there is no getPointerSize function. I checked the doxygen tree, it's there. So that means I didn't update my cvs tree correctly. Could you let me know how to update my CVS tree? Or there is a problem at somewhere else? Thanks, xiaodong On Sun, 10 Nov

Thanks Bill. One more question, when I use the DSNode iterator to traverse a node's children. The return value of I.getNode() can only be 'const DSNode *', I cannot use 'DSNode *' type. So as a result, I always get error message like this: MemLeakage.cpp:159: invalid conversion from `const DSNode*' to `DSNode*' MemLeakage.cpp:159: initializing argument 1 of `void

I was trying to call "DSGraph::computeCalleeCallerMapping" function on all caller-calle pair. But, in one case it gives an assertion failure. This is the error message I get. Processing internal callee function rt_error opt: /localhome/ssahoo2/llvm/src/lib/Analysis/DataStructure/DataStructure.cpp:2248: static void llvm::DSGraph::computeNodeMapping(const llvm::DSNodeHandle&, const

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > external global variables( and so inComplete ), Sounds right! > the call to printf will > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > Am I right ? :) If you've tested it then, yes you're right :). I haven't played with this stuff for a long time,

My app has a stylesheet that includes this definition: div.loadimage { width:580px; height:310px; background-image: url("/images/load.gif") no-repeat center 0% 0%; } The purpose is to use with some nice javascript by Patrick H. Lauke for fading in images. The div is supposed to include a "loading image" image which is overwritten by the final image when it has finished