similar to: [LLVMdev] Re: gdb for llvm

does anyone knows how to get the Olden BM bytecode files? We're low on disk space and I don't want to build the whole test branch (even if i can, which I doubt, it failed last time i tried).

Dear LLVM: I wrote a small testcase and I can compiler and run it with gcc, But with llvm, I got weird error like the following. I really don't know what's going on. Could you explain? Thanks a lot -Jerry Error Message: xli3|csil-suna38|~/mp2|[25]% llvmgcc testcase3.c testcase3.c: In function `init': testcase3.c:5: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size

When I check out llvm this morning. I got this error, so I couldn't check out. Looks like the disk is full.. Please let me know how to fix this problem. Thanks, xiaodong xli3|csil-suna33|/usr/dcs/projects/cs426/xli3/llvm|[10]% cvs update cvs update: Updating . ? gnumake.out cvs update: Updating Support cvs update: Updating include cvs update: Updating include/Support cvs update: cannot close

Pranav Garg wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. > However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of my > pass. I have compiled my > pass with a debug build and I have also compiled the input file (using > llvm-gcc) with the -g flag. Given below is the exact output. > > > (gdb) break

Hi, I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of my pass. I have compiled my pass with a debug build and I have also compiled the input file (using llvm-gcc) with the -g flag. Given below is the exact output. (gdb) break llvm::PassManager::run Breakpoint 1 at 0x86be87c: file

Hi John, Yes, it was the problem of the namespace. Sorry for bugging for such a silly mistake. Thanks Pranav On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:33 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Pranav Garg wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. >> However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of

> We tried that too...but still it returns an empty map. I'm not sure what's going on then. :) I think that Vikram is planning to update CVS soon, you might try that, as there has been significant updates. I'm not sure why getNodeForValue would work for you but getScalarMap doesn't... getNodeForValue USES the scalar map! :) > We also saw that Scalar Type has been

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Juan Nicolas Ruiz wrote: > It is valid that a function returns without using an Instruction::Ret > as the last instruction? No: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/LangRef.html#terminators All basic blocks must have a terminator. > If so, can we assume that a BasicBlock with > no successors is an exit BB? Yes, but you don't want to do this. Just do: if

LiveVariables gives you something like liveness analysis: where each variable is alive, that is, across each basic blocks, where it is defined, and where it is killed. LiveIntervals gives you a linear representation of the variables as a set of intervals. Yes, it handle holes in the live ranges. There is a very nice description of these analysis and related data structures here:

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, lee white baugh wrote: > do calls to exit() always have a null target-function pointer? that is > what i think i am seeing. Currently, yes. What's actually happening is that the call gets moved to the "globals graph". Essentially, this is due to the fact that the function call cannot modify the local memory graph of the current function. In cases where

% df -k /usr/dcs/projects Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on csil-server1:/usr/dcs/csil-projects 17332442 16991416 167702 100% /usr/dcs/projects % date Wed Oct 30 21:21:25 CST 2002 if anybody has good ideas on how to reduce disk usage, better speak up now....

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Misha Brukman wrote: > > A possible view of intrinsics could be "operations that don't depend > > on the target architecture, but instead on the language runtime". But > > then wouldn't malloc/free be intrinsics? > > Good question. Due to the amount of pointer/data analysis in LLVM, it > is often necessary to consider memory

The problem with llvmgcc invoking as instead of llvm-as has been fixed. 3 llvm-specific executables needed to be copied into a default location where gcc can find them if it does not find them as configured (gcc was configured for the paths on our research machines and copied over). Let us know if you have additional problems. --Vikram > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin

Dear Prof. Adve, Now I can use llvmgcc to compile a .c file into .bc file. But I still have trouble simply run the .bc code. Below is the sequence I got when I tried. I really don't know what's going on here. Please let me know how can I fix it. Thanks, xiaodong xli3|csil-suna48|~/cs426|[13]% llvmgcc scalarize.c -o scalarize xli3|csil-suna48|~/cs426|[14]% scalarize Cannot load value of

Hello, I want to know how to perform stepwise elimination of variables to svyglm thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Thanks, Chris, Below is the output of 'llvmgcc he.c -v' xli3|csil-suna27|~/cs426|[35]% llvmgcc he.c -v Reading specs from /usr/dcs/projects/cs426/Software/gcc_install/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/llvm/3.1/specs Configured with: /home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc/configure --srcdir=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc --prefix=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc_install_sparc --target=llvm --enable-languages=c

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 03:18:00PM +0200, Marc Ordinas i Llopis wrote: > I'm currently looking at LLVM as a possible back-end to a dynamic > programming system (in the tradition of Smalltalk) we are developing. Neat! > I have read most of the llvmdev archives, and I'm aware that some > things are 'planned' but not implemented yet. We are willing to > contribute

dyn_cast<> will return NULL if i is not an AllocationInst object. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve > From: Jianzhong Liu <jliu7 at uiuc.edu> > Sender: jliu7 at cs.uiuc.edu > Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:00:04 -0500 > Subject: an error > > I keep getting a core dump error for: > > ... > const Type *opType =

I've been trying to obtain a DSGraph for a complete module, but haven't succeeded. I tried - getting the DSGraph for each function, and copying the nodes to a Module graph. But since there are no nodehandles, apparently there is no merging of nodes. - modifying BUDataStructure Pass so that it will not execute removeDeadNodes() or removeTriviallyDeadNodes(). - couldn't get

I have some questions regarding how globals are represented in DS graph. Specifically, I wrote the following simple program: List *g; void alloc_func(){ g = ( List* ) malloc( sizeof( List ) ); } void free_func(){ free( g ); } int main(){ alloc_func(); free_func(); } I noticed that the DSnode for g in alloc_func is different from that of free_func and NEITHER of them had GlobalNode