similar to: [LLVMdev] What is test/Libraries?

Hi What did I start? <*shrug*> Well, well, well. First a little bit of history: I joined the LLVM project, because the ideas sounded very interesting to me and I voluntered for a minor patch for prefetch datasupport for the gcc-compiler. At that time, when I joined, the only possibility to develop on the windows platform was to use Cygwin Unix Windows emulation layer, but it had some

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > In buildling XPS using LLVM's makefile system, I'm finding that there's > a few things lacking in our support for LLVM-based projects. The items > below should help but may require changes to project makefiles. I > thought I'd check before just going and doing it. ok. > 1. Various autoconf generated variables (e.g.

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:47 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> Very nice. Reid/Anton, do you guys have an idea when the svn server will >> be available? > > Mid April. > > The SVN server is getting installed tomorrow. Anton and I are still > testing the automated conversion script (almost there). > > We will probably

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > These are all reasons why the Win32 port doesn't exist today. LLVM is Well, the reason it doesn't exist today is that noone has worked on it. :) > heavily influenced and implemented by Unix tools/concepts/facilities. > Since building on Win32 will also be a problem, I think that we should > just target cygwin as our Win32 solution

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > i'd like to know what progress you guys have made (not on cvs?). Everything is in CVS. Noone is currently working on automating the pattern matching generator process yet. Before doing that, there are a few changes we want to make to the SelectionDAG interface. In particular, right now, the selection process basically works like this: #1.

The LLVM 1.4 Release is now out! Get it here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/ or read about it here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.4/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew This release features a huge assortment of improvements in functionality, generated code quality, and compile times. Thanks to everyone who has helped make this release the best one yet. In addition to the changes

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, John Criswell wrote: > addPass(PM, createSimplifyLibCallsPass()); // Library Call Optimizations > > Rebuild gccas. Then, try to build the LLVM GCC frontend again. Please email > the llvmdev list and let us know if it works. > > In the meantime, I will continue to try to get a reduced test case and either > fix the bug or hand it off to Reid (the

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, HyperQuantum wrote: > I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless "-disable-opt" is specified. What is the reason for this? If this is

the proposed architecture (chris) doesn't seem to attack the phase ordering problem. through having independent instruction selection, instruction scheduling, and register allocation phases faciliate a modular design, but i believe the phase-coupled code generator generator high quality code on many architectures. espeically in the embedded system like a media/dsp processors with very limited

Hi all LLVM CVS users, Recently, the LLVM makefiles have changed how runtime libraries are handled for the C/C++ frontend. Please take the following steps (assuming 'llvmgccdir' is whatever you normally pass to configure as the --with-llvmgcdir option): 1. Go into your llvm/runtime directory, and run 'make install-bytecode'. This will install runtime libraries into

On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> The only thing I did not like was a clsh between the enum X86 and the new >>> namespace X86, which I had to rename as x86 :( >>> >>> Anyway, I suppose the lower case 'x' in 'x86' fits in with the lowercase >>> 'llvm' namespace. >> >> I'm not sure I follow. X86 is a

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > As a possibly less-engineered complement, your end-state could be > provided simply by creating folders in Subversion prefabbed with > appropriate svn:externals. Make one for each end-project (llvm-gcc, > new-cfe, and soforth). It's not nearly so clever, but it might allow > initial usage much closer to the 'configure; make; make

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Valery Khamenya wrote: > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? We generally have not published a road map like this because it is very difficult to do it in a meaningful way. Because LLVM is largely driven by volenteers and because noone working on it guarantees that they will finish a project that they start, we

FYI, gperf is a very good perfect hash utility written originally by Doug Schmidt (of ACE fame). I used it in XPS for speeding up XML parsing by hashing all the element and attribute names. Unfortunately, its a code generator, which we're trying to get rid of in LLVM. Still, I recommend the tool highly. Reid. On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:04:57 -0800 Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'm trying to figure out which LLVM libraries (er.. object files that > is) I should link with my programs. It isn't clear to me what the build > output of LLVM is. I tried the new make "install" target and got a > plethora of .o files. The few .a files I got had _likely_to_conflict_ > names such as

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Aristid Breitkreuz wrote: > I am, as said in the subject, new to this list. I have not actually used > LLVM, I tried with an older version but failed. Recently I noticed that > 1.7 came out and looked at the release notes. And there was something > that stroke me: llvm-g++ adheres to the IA64 ABI but _not for > exceptions_. I was not able to find information why

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Nick Lewycky wrote: > That's surprising to me. I thought there was a pass that converts > malloc's that trivially dominate all free's and whose pointer doesn't > escape would be lowered to alloca's -- but I looked and couldn't find one. nope, there isn't one. > Why isn't there one? Because it wouldn't be profitable? Or because

Attached is my patch that adds a (debug build only) verifier pass and support for creating passes specified on the command line to llc. Let me know if it needs changes to be acceptable. One thing I noticed is that (eg.) opt and analyze have their options and globals in an anonymous namespace while llc doesn't. I just used llc's convention - which is preferable? As to testing - It works

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:05:14PM -0500, Michael McConville via llvm-dev wrote: > > This addition converts strlen() calls to strnlen() when the result is > > compared to a constant. For example, the following: > > > > strlen(s) < 5 > > > > Becomes: > > > > strnlen(s, 5) < 5 > > > > That way, we

On Sat, 1 May 2004, Anthony Evans wrote: > I was wondering whether anyone has attempted to port LLVM to windows > running with a POSIX layer, such as cygwin? I know that Brian once got the LLVM CVS core compiled under Cygwin, but I don't recall how well it worked. I thought he had the JIT running, but I might be wrong. > I recently tried to build and run llvm on cygwin, and I got