similar to: [LLVMdev] something is wrong

Dear llvm, I just tried to compile a simple file hello.c. But each time I used llvmgcc hello.c, it gave me the following error: xli3|csil-suna33|~/cs426|[13]% llvmgcc hello.c as: error opening '/var/tmp//ccapglpE.o': file exists! Use -f command line argument to force output I really got confused. Could you please let me know what's wrong? thanks, Jerry

Dear Prof. Adve, Now I can use llvmgcc to compile a .c file into .bc file. But I still have trouble simply run the .bc code. Below is the sequence I got when I tried. I really don't know what's going on here. Please let me know how can I fix it. Thanks, xiaodong xli3|csil-suna48|~/cs426|[13]% llvmgcc scalarize.c -o scalarize xli3|csil-suna48|~/cs426|[14]% scalarize Cannot load value of

Thanks, Chris, Below is the output of 'llvmgcc he.c -v' xli3|csil-suna27|~/cs426|[35]% llvmgcc he.c -v Reading specs from /usr/dcs/projects/cs426/Software/gcc_install/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/llvm/3.1/specs Configured with: /home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc/configure --srcdir=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc --prefix=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc_install_sparc --target=llvm --enable-languages=c

When I check out llvm this morning. I got this error, so I couldn't check out. Looks like the disk is full.. Please let me know how to fix this problem. Thanks, xiaodong xli3|csil-suna33|/usr/dcs/projects/cs426/xli3/llvm|[10]% cvs update cvs update: Updating . ? gnumake.out cvs update: Updating Support cvs update: Updating include cvs update: Updating include/Support cvs update: cannot close

Dear LLVM: I wrote a small testcase and I can compiler and run it with gcc, But with llvm, I got weird error like the following. I really don't know what's going on. Could you explain? Thanks a lot -Jerry Error Message: xli3|csil-suna38|~/mp2|[25]% llvmgcc testcase3.c testcase3.c: In function `init': testcase3.c:5: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size

The problem with llvmgcc invoking as instead of llvm-as has been fixed. 3 llvm-specific executables needed to be copied into a default location where gcc can find them if it does not find them as configured (gcc was configured for the paths on our research machines and copied over). Let us know if you have additional problems. --Vikram > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin

> I just tried to compile a simple file hello.c. But each time I used > llvmgcc hello.c, it gave me the following error: > > xli3|csil-suna33|~/cs426|[13]% llvmgcc hello.c > as: error opening '/var/tmp//ccapglpE.o': file exists! > Use -f command line argument to force output First try doing an 'rm -f /var/tmp/*' and try again. If that still doesn't work,

Dear Prof. Adve, I recently checked out the llvm using cvs update command under the llvm directory. But when I went to see the DSNode.h, there is no getPointerSize function. I checked the doxygen tree, it's there. So that means I didn't update my cvs tree correctly. Could you let me know how to update my CVS tree? Or there is a problem at somewhere else? Thanks, xiaodong On Sun, 10 Nov

Finally lli and llvmgcc can work under my directory. I wrote the following simple program and compiled it using gcc and then run it without any problem. But when I tried to compile it using llvmgcc and lli, llvmgcc gave me the following error message which I cannot understand: xli3|csil-suna37|~/cs426|[181]% llvmgcc test.c -o test test.c: In function `init': test.c:10: warning: cast to

shouldn't the malloc() be something like malloc(sizeof(int)*size)? You're allocating 5 bytes, which is probably not the size of an int in llvm (it's definitely not the size of an int in sparc), and later you're trying to access c[1], which starts at byte 4 but is out of bounds. On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Xiaodong Li wrote: > Dear LLVM: > > I wrote a small testcase and I can

Hi, I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of my pass. I have compiled my pass with a debug build and I have also compiled the input file (using llvm-gcc) with the -g flag. Given below is the exact output. (gdb) break llvm::PassManager::run Breakpoint 1 at 0x86be87c: file

Pranav Garg wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. > However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of my > pass. I have compiled my > pass with a debug build and I have also compiled the input file (using > llvm-gcc) with the -g flag. Given below is the exact output. > > > (gdb) break

Hi John, Yes, it was the problem of the namespace. Sorry for bugging for such a silly mistake. Thanks Pranav On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:33 AM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Pranav Garg wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to debug my llvm pass called -aa-eval-garg11 using gdb. >> However I am not able to establish a breakpoint in any function of

Hi, In the quest for better test cases for my MP, I thought of trying the Stepanov Abstraction Penalty benchmark. But apparently llvm-g++ is not ready for such terrible things. Let me know if you want me to send the source code (it is widely available). gaeke|csil-suna37|~/cs/426/MP1/step|[1177]% /usr/dcs/projects/cs426/Software/gcc_install/bin/g++ stepanov.cpp -o stepanov In file included from

> > First off, make sure you are sending the graphs through the "dot" > > utility. It turns them into a nice format that is much easier to > > visualize than the text format... :) > > hmmm... how do I get to use the magical "dot" utility? It sounds > pretty much like what I'm looking for, and I found it in >

I think since we use the replaceAllUsesWith to replace all uses of old one, the old one should already be a instruction with # of uses equals 0. So it should be Ok to directly delete it. Can you let me know if there is anything wrong with simple deletion? Why can we create illegal LLVM? Thanks, xiaodong ---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:50:00 -0500 >From: "Vikram

logins Reply-To: I've sourced the groups, but haven't had any success with solving this problem. Here are the details: I have a debian/testing system running samba 3.0.0beta2-1. It was working fine with the 2.x series, until I upgraded to 3.0. The debian server (al) is a PDC for a small NT domain (isabela) with three workstations, all running win2k pro. All but one work fine

LiveVariables gives you something like liveness analysis: where each variable is alive, that is, across each basic blocks, where it is defined, and where it is killed. LiveIntervals gives you a linear representation of the variables as a set of intervals. Yes, it handle holes in the live ranges. There is a very nice description of these analysis and related data structures here:

On 4/3/07, David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > > Toward a better register allocator, I'm attempting to understand > the dataflow information available to the allocator. > > What's the difference between LiveInterval information and LiveVariable > information? If a LiveInterval is based on a linear ordering of > the machine instructions, isn't it

I'm looking for a way to generalize the calculation of (log) odds ratios for 2 x 2 x {strata} frequency tables in vcd::oddsratio() to R x C x {strata} tables. For an R x C table, F, odds ratios can be defined in several ways; one simple way, particularly for tables with ordered factors, is to calculate the set of continuation odds ratios, based on the (R-1)x(C-1) set of 2x2 tables with