similar to: [LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > >>The next major problem is that VC has only > >> > >>int rand(void) > >>void srand( int seed ) > >> > >>So I donno how to compile the > >>ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the > >>drand48 srand48

Hmm, I guess I need a sys::Math::getRandom() function that uses a "good" random number generator on the given platform. I'll make a note of this and tuck it away for future implementation. Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > >>The next major problem is that VC has only >> >>int rand(void) >>void srand(

Hello llvmdev, (just for fun) I've tried to compile LLVM under cygwin. With "make -k" I got only: ----------------- DynamicLinker.cpp: In function `void* GetAddressOfSymbol(const char*)': DynamicLinker.cpp:40: error: `RTLD_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use this function) DynamicLinker.cpp:40: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each

Here I am again... I missed that in the previous diff, they are the usual missing <algorithm> and the std:: namespace missing in sort, find, make_pair. Alkis can you please give them an eye when you have time? The next major problem is that VC has only int rand(void) void srand( int seed ) So I donno how to compile the ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > The next major problem is that VC has only > > int rand(void) > void srand( int seed ) > > So I donno how to compile the > ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the > drand48 srand48 lrand48 etc series... > For now I hacked them, like > > double drand48(void) { return (float) rand() /

Hi, > It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external > functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not > supported ? > > "lli -force-interpreter test.bc > LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, > double)* fmod > " You can check out the comments in

On Jun 14, 2011, at 7:57 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, > >> It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external >> functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not >> supported ? >> >> "lli -force-interpreter test.bc >> LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, >> double)* fmod

Linking lli debug executable (without symbols) /mounts/zion/disks/0/localhome/pmeredit/llvm/lib/Debug/lli-interpreter.o(.te xt+0x643a): In function `llvm::Interpreter::callExternalFunction(llvm::Function*, std::vector<llvm::GenericValue, std::allocator<llvm::GenericValue> > const&)': /localhome/pmeredit/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.c pp:98: undefined

Hi, I spent a bit of time making llvm link on FreeBSD 5.1-RC1 (i686) tonight. (I didn't run any tests.) Here are the issues I ran into: 0. Need a llvm/Makefile.FreeBSD; Makefile.Linux unchanged worked OK 1. libdl doesn't exist; remove TOOLLINKOPTS=-ldl to link tools that use libdl 2. include/Support/DataTypes.h doesn't work for FreeBSD; I hacked a new version 3. alloca.h doesn't

ISSUE: In Interpreter::getCurrentExecutablePath(), dladdr() is a Solarisism. Luckily, getCurrentExecutablePath isn't being currently used anywhere in lli. ACTION: Wrap the method contents with #ifdef __sun__ ... #else return ""; #endif. If this functionality is actually desired, it would be more portable to hack up main() to join getcwd() with basename(argv[0]) to find the

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> Hacking on the interpreter is easy, but has several drawbacks. In >> particular, the interpreter is very slow (even compared to other >> interpreters) and it is missing functionality: you cannot call arbitrary >> external functions, which causes many programs to fail in it. > > What do you mean

We've had this argument before. IMO LLVM should not be in the business of closing stdout, and no code in lib/ should print to stdout because users may expect output there (-o -). On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-Jan-23, at 09:52, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > > > >

Hello, I have a following dataframe with many rows. data.frame(match.start=c(5,10,100,200),range.coordinates=c("1000-1050","1500-1555","5000-5050,6000-6180","100-150,200-260,600-900")) match.start range.coordinates 5 1000-1050 10 1500-1555 100 5000-5050,6000-6180 200

On Oct 25, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Index: lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp > =================================================================== > RCS file: > /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ > ExternalFunctions.cpp,v > retrieving revision 1.78 > diff -u -r1.78 ExternalFunctions.cpp > ---

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: diff.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041025/d290c6e0/attachment.txt>

Morten Ofstad wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There's no HAVE_RAND48 symbol provided by autoconf. You'll have to >> add the appropriate check to autoconf/configure.ac before we can take >> this patch. I installed autoconf with cygwin now and I think I've managed to do this right now -- there are some strange problems with running the AutoRegen.sh script, so I

> Hi, > > There's no HAVE_RAND48 symbol provided by autoconf. You'll have to add > the appropriate check to autoconf/configure.ac before we can take this > patch. Sorry I forgot to mention I didn't make any changes to the configure script. The problem is that I can't test these things since I'm not on a Unix platform, and I'm not even using the

Chris, I'm fine with using JIT, but I'm trying to understand this problem: 1. My LLVM program does not produce correct results 2. Using llvm-dis, I disassemble the bytecode to C 3. I recompile using GCC and the program _works correctly_. The only odd thing is when I recompile with GCC, I see these messages: pal3.c:195: warning: conflicting types for built-in function `strcmp'

The only thing I can think of is that string.h is being #included and has different signatures for memcpy and strncpy. Possibly "char" is not signed on your machine (very unusual) or some of the parameters are declared as "const". Reid. On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 18:19, Eric Zimmerman wrote: > Chris, > > I'm fine with using JIT, but I'm trying to understand this

It seems llvm interpreter only supports a limited number of external functions. fmod, in particular is not supported. any reason why it is not supported ? "lli -force-interpreter test.bc LLVM ERROR: Tried to execute an unknown external function: double (double, double)* fmod " -- Kind Regards Xin Tong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: