Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Significant change to GCC front-end"
2008 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] Newbie question on front-end and code compaction
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Bernardo Elayda wrote:
> I'm also interested in helping out with compaction(making code with
> a small footprint).
People pointed out recently on the list that -Os doesn't work so
well. See the email from regehr at cs.utah.edu on Aug 20 on llvmdev.
You should be able to work with him to get testcases, from there you
just grind through them and
2020 Jan 11
3
FC : A MLIR+LLVM based Fortran front end
Hi-
In August we made an announcement of "FC: A new fortran front end" [1].
At that time to get an end-to-end solution, we made FC to emit LLVM IR
directly. At present, we have upgraded FC to emit MLIR. Currently the
language supported is close to Fortran-95. Apart from 400+ unit test cases,
out framework passes two SPEC-2017 benchmarks successfully. Currently we
are cleaning up the
2009 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] leveraging back-end C compiler features in the gcc-based front-end
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Bob Frankel <bios.bob.frankel at gmail.com> wrote:
> i'm looking into using llvm with TI's MSP430
Ah, you're in luck then: an MSP430 backend was checked in to SVN today
:) I don't think it's mature enough for general use yet, though.
> is there a way to leverage these (non-gcc) intrinsics in the llvm gcc-based
> frontend --
2009 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] leveraging back-end C compiler features in the gcc-based front-end
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">wow!!! i would be interested in
trying
2004 Oct 19
1
[LLVMdev] llvm gcc front end name mangling
How can I declare a function prototype in C/C++ such that the gcc front end
won't mangle the name? I was told that extern would work once but it
doesn't.
2006 Sep 01
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM gcc front-end versus Microsoft Visual C++ 8.0 compiler
Hi!
I'm eager to know what compiler optimizes code better: Microsoft Visual C++
8.0 or LLVM's front-end?
If some tests and results are available I'd appreciate anyone who points me
at it.
Thanks.
Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060901/9c96c831/attachment.html>
2007 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] Build problems, LLVM 2.0's GCC front-end.
Chris,
> As was mentioned, please configure with --enable-languages=c,c++.
> More generally, make sure you follow the instructions in README.LLVM
> at the top of the llvm-gcc source tree.
I think my objc-unbreak patch for 4.2 should be applied to 4.0 as well.
I'll investigate.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State
2007 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
On 10/2/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
> Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
>
> configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
> --enable-llvm=DIR
> make: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
>
> I've done the following
2007 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
> I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
> Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
>
> configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
> --enable-llvm=DIR
> make: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
>
> I've done the following in csh before hand:
> $ setenv LLVMOBJDIR
2007 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:47 -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah <napi at axiomsol.com> wrote:
> > I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
> > Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
> >
> > configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
> >
2007 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:38 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> > I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
> > Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
> >
> > configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
> > --enable-llvm=DIR
> > make: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
> >
> >
2009 Jan 19
1
[LLVMdev] Trying to install gcc front end...
Hello all,
I'm trying to install LLVM with the gcc front end. (Using gcc release 4.2 with LLVM 2.4)
I tried installing it using the bash code here:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-gcc/llvm-gcc/PKGBUILD
Unfortunately after it built and compiled everything, I ran into a problem.
Apparently some gcc-libs 4.3.2 libraries conflict with the gcc 4.2 front end.
I got this log in this error:
2009 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
Hi,
> cc1: /pkg/build/llvm/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/InlineCost.h:44:
> llvm::InlineCost::InlineCost(int, int): Assertion `Cost == C && "Cost
> exceeds InlineCost precision"' failed.
> ../../llvm-gcc4.2-2.5.source/gcc/libgcov.c:644: internal compiler error: Aborted
this is indeed a miscompilation by your system compiler. However so many
compilers
2009 May 06
0
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
Hello, Scott
> Thanks, I am making some progress. The latest from svn (for llvm and
> llvm-gcc) built successfully. I built everything without adjusting the
> PATH, so I guess I used gcc 4.1.2.
Even if you'll succeed, most probably LLVM will be miscompiled. gcc
4.1.2 is known buggy: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc
---
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
2009 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
Hi,
> OK, not quite sure what this means about my system tools. Is there
> something I should be concerned about?
it seems that a bug in your system tools happens to be tickled by
LLVM. We can't do much about the fact that your system doesn't
work properly, though if enough people see a problem we do sometimes
try to tweak LLVM so it avoids triggering the bug. If you don't
2009 Sep 03
1
[LLVMdev] Solaris SPARC llvm-gcc front-end
Hello.
How are the things going with the llvm-gcc for SPARC and Solaris OS? I have
discovered recently the fact, that the code is still in the "patches
welcome" stage and is far even from being successfully built on SPARC. I
would like to know, if anyone maintaining this code, what is the current
to-do list, etc. I would like to offer my help for gcc front-end on SPARC
project.
--
2009 Sep 04
1
[LLVMdev] Dose I need to build llvm-gcc front-end from source resolve this error?
/*
mm.cpp
*/
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
struct xx{
int x;
int mm()const;
int mm();
};
int xx::mm() const
{
return const_cast<xx*>(this)->mm();
}
int xx::mm()
{
cout<<"ok"<<endl;
return x;
}
int main()
{
xx x;
x.mm();
return 0;
}
2010 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] fail to build LLVM GCC front-end
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Jiandong Wang <computerhenu at gmail.com> wrote:
> I followed the instructions in llvm_gcc's README.LLVM file, but not exactly
> the same.
>
> the following is what I have done with LLVM:
> ./configure --disable-optimized --enable-checking
> make
> make install
> (Successful)
>
> now the llvm-gcc:
> cd /home/username
>
2010 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] fail to build LLVM GCC front-end
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Jiandong Wang wrote:
> I try to build it on Ubuntu9.04, but in vain. There are errors:
>
> ...
> ...
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/username/llvm-2.7/Debug/include/llvm/Intrinsics.gen', needed by `llvm-convert.o'. Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/username/obj/gcc'
> make[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2
>
2009 May 06
0
[LLVMdev] Using non-system compiler to build llvm and llvm-gcc front end
Hello, Scott
> Yes, so I have read -- which is why I initially installed gcc-4.2.4.
> My original post was looking for help on how to use gcc-4.2.4. Some
> suggestions were made, but I was not able to get everything built. It
> seems that despite attempting to configure with everything pointing to
> gcc-4.2.4 (and not the system gcc 4.1.2), at some point in the build,
>