similar to: [LLVMdev] Test #2: please ignore

Thank you so much for your reply, Chris. If so, can I ask you two things more? First, is there any way to have various optimizations on LLVM assembly such as -O options in llvmc? llvm-gcc doesn't seem to be working for these -O options... Second, I'm still not sure about difference between *.s and *.ll. LLVM assembly *.s file can be made from llvm-gcc with -S option. Another

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > The only thing I can think of is that string.h is being #included and > has different signatures for memcpy and strncpy. Possibly "char" is not > signed on your machine (very unusual) or some of the parameters are > declared as "const". The problem is that the code generated by the C backend cannot include any system

Dear Duncan, thank you very much. I have been able to use it now, via the following command line: clang -emit-llvm -c -fstack-protector canary.c -o canary.bc llc -print-before=stack-protector -print-after=stack-protector -o canary.s < canary.bc Thank you again, Izabela Maffra. On 26 January 2013 15:55, <llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Send LLVMdev mailing

On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Ben Chambers wrote: > Ah, I was missing that include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h change. Thanks! > Now I have it working, except for the fact that it doesn't seem to > generate fresh names for things. Or if it does, they're the empty > string (I suspect it is the latter, since when I create the new > instruction the empty string is passed in for the name of

llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > >You can reach the person managing the list at

I commented this line and it is compiling now: extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); I hope that will not cause a different kind of problem. What it is zalloc used for? Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > It seems that this happened before but I do not know the details: > >

Yes, sorry for not mentioning it. I added that header also Although I suppose that if I am not using Sparc there will be no problem (it's an Itanium 2 machine) Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > I commented this line and it is compiling now: > > > > extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); > >

void MetaSplit::handleProgramUses(Value *V){ if(!isa<BasicBlock>(V)) programValues.insert(V); if(User *U = dyn_cast<User>(V)){ User::op_iterator OB = U->op_begin(), OE = U->op_end(); for(; OB != OE; ++OB){ if(CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(*OB)){ Function *F = CI->getCalledFunction(); if(F == ii || F == fi || F == vi || F == di || F == ci

llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > >You can reach the person managing the list at

Ah, I was missing that include/llvm/LinkAllPasses.h change. Thanks! Now I have it working, except for the fact that it doesn't seem to generate fresh names for things. Or if it does, they're the empty string (I suspect it is the latter, since when I create the new instruction the empty string is passed in for the name of the instruction). Is there some way to get a new name (like

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Patrick Meredith wrote: > Somehow it fails with operand out of bounds when the number of operands > is 2 and I am asking for the second operand. Second meaning operand 1. Okay, so you have something like this: if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(...)) { ... = CI->getOperand(1); } Can you send in this snippet of code, the assertion, and the

Hi, Have you tried the new VC8 Beta? It's been out for less than 2 weeks: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx It's supposed to have improved standards compliance. Regards, -Eugene Talagrand On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:56:03 -0500 (CDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Reply-To: llvmdev at

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote: > This certainly doesn't occur in gcc mainline. > In fact, I improved the error message, and added a error test to gcc > just yesterday. Yep, clang reports: t.c:4:12: error: read-only variable is not assignable arr[0] = 1; ~~~~~~ ^ 1 diagnostic generated. so this is specific to llvm-gcc somehow. -Chris > On 8/9/07, Chris

I'm not sure if dejagnu is installed correctly. Is there any way to call it on the command line? I get this: ------------------- $ runtest --version | tee -a my_runtest.log WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. Expect version is 5.21 Tcl version is 8.0 Framework version is 1.4.4 ------------------- and ------------------- $ ls /usr/local/share/dejagnu/

The only thing I can think of is that string.h is being #included and has different signatures for memcpy and strncpy. Possibly "char" is not signed on your machine (very unusual) or some of the parameters are declared as "const". Reid. On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 18:19, Eric Zimmerman wrote: > Chris, > > I'm fine with using JIT, but I'm trying to understand this

Somehow it fails with operand out of bounds when the number of operands is 2 and I am asking for the second operand. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] weird issue with mem2reg, should have guessed > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Patrick Meredith

OK, that explains it. I probably didn't have runtest installed the last time I ran configure, and re-syncing with CVS also caused it to reconfigure, solving the problem but confusing me. Thanks, -mike On 8/24/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this

This certainly doesn't occur in gcc mainline. In fact, I improved the error message, and added a error test to gcc just yesterday. On 8/9/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Nikhil A. Patil wrote: > > I think I found a bug. I don't know if it's in upstream gcc or llvm-gcc4. > > Looks like a bug, please file a bugzilla entry. >

I use the following code to do the depth first search on the DSGraph. And I always got this error message. Couldn't figure out what's wrong. Could you please let me know? Besides, I really have no idea about what those functions do. Is there any documentation about DSGraph functions besides the pool allocation paper? Thanks, xiaodong Code: for( df_iterator<DSNode*> I =

Can any one, who has dejagnu and expect installed and working, send me an output when running '(g)make check' from llvm. Thanks. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= 'Nothing is impossible; The impossible