similar to: New mailing list is up!

On August 4th (~9AM PDT, exact time TBD), all LLVM related mailing lists will move to a new mailing list server and will change to listname at lists.llvm.org. LLVMDev will probably change to LLVM-Dev and LLVMBugs to LLVM-Bugs to preserve consistency. This means a couple of things: 1) All mailing lists will be down on August 4th. We anticipated at least the full day of downtime (hopefully less if

The LLVM mailing lists are being moved to their new home starting at 9AM PDT TODAY. As a reminder: 1) SVN access will be read only 2) Bugzilla is unavailable 3) LLVM Reviews will be down. 3) Mailing lists will move to listname at lists.llvm.org (plus 2 are renamed: LLVMDev -> llvm-dev, LLVMBugs -> llvm-bugs) I will send an email to the new lists once they are open for posting and when SVN

On August 4th (~9AM PDT, exact time TBD), all LLVM related mailing lists will move to a new mailing list server and will change to listname at lists.llvm.org. LLVMDev will probably change to LLVM-Dev to preserve consistency. This means a couple of things: 1) All mailing lists will be down on August 4th. We anticipated at least the full day of downtime (hopefully less if things go well). 2) SVN

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tanya, > > I was spelunking through bugzilla and ran into an old mailing list link > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html > (found in PR36). > > I expect this

Hi Tanya, I was spelunking through bugzilla and ran into an old mailing list link http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html (found in PR36). I expect this link to be broken since our servers are not on that domain. No big deal, just change it to lists.llvm.org: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-January/005137.html Looks like that doesn't exist, as the

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > What were you thinking? I increased it to 5MB.. but it sounds like you > have 26MB attachments? > Is 50MB doable? -- Sean Silva > > -Tanya > > On Jul 13, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Tanya, could you increase the max attachment size

All, llvm.org <http://llvm.org/> (including SVN and all web services) will be down on Thursday 7/9 starting at 12PM PDT. The server will be moved to a new location with a new IP address (192.17.58.186). It may take awhile for the DNS changes to propagate (TTL is 1 hour). I will send email to the list again shortly before the move begins. Thank you for your patience! -Tanya

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Bill Wendling wrote: > What's the config.log from this run? its attached. -Tanya > > -bw > > On 11/3/05, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> >> Following the instructions here: >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run >> >> I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. >>

Just a reminder that the 2016 European LLVM Developers’ Meeting less than a month away (March 17/18). Please be sure to register before we sell out! http://www.llvm.org/devmtg/2016-03/#registration <http://www.llvm.org/devmtg/2016-03/#registration> IMPORTANT: We have been hearing about problems with registering using US credit cards. Your credit card may think the transaction is fraud and

The deadline is tonight! Get your proposal in :) -Tanya > On Jul 27, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > > Just a reminder that this deadline is coming up. Submit your proposal today! > > -Tanya > >> On Jun 29, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>> wrote: >>

Currently the LLVMbugs list only receives emails when a new bug is filed or an existing bug gets finally resolved. The gcc-bugs list on the other hand receives an email for every new comment in bugzilla. This leads to much better transparency, because you can easily see which bugs are currently being worked on; while the current LLVMbugs setup left you totally in the dark. So my suggestion would

I expect llvm.org to need another 30 minutes of downtime. Thank you for your patience. Thanks, Tanya On Apr 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder that llvm.org will be rebooted in 15 minutes, and will be down for about 30 minutes or less. It will be rebooted a couple times so you might see it come up and go back down, but do not get

Call for Talks, Tutorials, BoFs, Panels, and More! All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present at the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting. We are looking for the following proposals: - Technical Talks on LLVM Infrastructure (~30 minutes) - Technicals Talks on related sub-projects (Clang, etc) - Talks of uses of LLVM in academia or industry - Talks on new projects

llvm.org is now down. I will notify you when it is back up. This will take several hours. -Tanya On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. > > Thank you, > Tanya > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> To be clear: >>

Gentle susbscribers, This is a reminder to all samba mailing list subscribers that this list is moderated. Most of you know what that means, so for the benefit of those who are new to the list or who are not familiar with the mechanics of a mailing list please note the following: 1) Incoming messages are scanned and filtered by mailman to remove messages that may have objectionable content, are

The deadline is today! However, I've decided to give all the procrastinators a couple extra days. You have until Wednesday 9/19 at 9:00PM PDT. Thanks, Tanya On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Just a reminder that we are still accepting proposals!. > > The deadline is less than 2 weeks away, so please send your proposals in as soon as possible. > > Thank

Just a reminder, LLVM.org will be going down in 1 hour. Thank you, Tanya On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > To be clear: > Friday, February 1, 2013 & Monday, February 4, 2013 > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> LLVMers, >> >> llvm.org will be down on 2/1

What, the deadline is tomorrow?!? The deadline for proposals snuck up on me, and I'm sure many of you forgot as well. Therefore, I am extending the deadline. I have received some great talk proposals, so keep them coming. However, I have very few tutorials, BoFs, posters, or lightening talk proposals. So please, get those proposals in and lets make this year the best developer meeting yet!

> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > I'm curious about the requirement to provide birth date—what's that about? Liability reasons because we serve alcohol at the reception. I can change to age if thats better or ask if someone is under 21 but you may still be asked show ID if a server is unsure. -Tanya > Thanks, >

> On Monday 02 February 2009 13:20, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> Just a reminder, I'll be re-creating the 2.5 branch tonight at 9pm PST. > > What does re-creating mean? Why can't the previously-created 2.5 branch > simply be updated? It means deleting the branch and creating a new one. > I ask because svn history will look a little wierd and it makes it harder for