similar to: Opus Todo

<div id="contentDescription" style="line-height:1.5;text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph"> <div>Thanks to your reply.</div><div><br></div><div>So part of the wiki is out of date? Beside Opus-tools, I also concern about the spec, optimization and future work in wiki. Could you tell me about if they are out

On 2019-08-27 8:15 a.m., 陈伟旭 wrote: > I had found a Opus TODO list in > https://wiki.xiph.org/index.php?title=OpusTodo > > The item "Opus-tools" interest me. And here is my question about "Port > opusdec to libopusfile/libopusurl": It looks like this was done a couple of years ago, primarily in commit e9bbfacf0a1bbade70005fa730cc50e838baaa32, and part of the

On 20/08/13 08:38 PM, alpha thinktink wrote: > However, if I try to load the new libopusurl-0.dll from the same folder > as I have always done as with the other libraries, I get a NULL HMODULE > handle from LoadLibraryW and GetLastError() return error code 126 - "The > specified module could not be found." In addition to what Tim said, do you get the same error loading

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm pleased to announce the availability of opusfile v0.4. The opusfile and opusurl libraries provide a high-level API for decoding and seeking within .opus files on disk or over http(s). * https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/opus/opusfile-0.4.tar.gz * https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/opus/opusfile-0.4.zip *

Hi I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to compile OK. I've tried with opus-1.0.3 and opus-1.1-beta. The errors are like this:- "undefined reference to `sqrtf'" etc. This OS is Peppermint Three, similar to Ubuntu 12.04. It uses:- gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Google says it's maybe something to do

陈伟旭 wrote: > So part of the wiki is out of date? Beside Opus-tools, I also concern > about the spec, optimization and future work in wiki. Could you tell me > about if they are out of date? > On 08/28/2019 00:08, Ralph Giles <mailto:giles at thaumas.net> wrote: For the Spec section: There is a Matroska mapping, and it has been implemented in Firefox and FFmpeg (and Chrome

Dear authors of Opus, currently, the manpages that come with opus-tools are written in the traditional man(7) markup language. I am proposing to rewrite them into the semantic markup of the mdoc(7) language. I am willing to do the work. Both the man(7) and mdoc(7) languages have been around for decades, and are supported by the prevalent formatters: groff(1) on most Linuxes and mandoc(1) on the

Dear Opus community, I'm trying to build opusfile as a shared (.dll) library on Windows 10 using Visual Studio 2017. I know there are prebuilt libraries, but those are depending on a whole bunch of other libraries and x86 (32 bit) only. Whenever I try to build opusfile, it generates opusfile.dll, which is basically empty (no functions), which makes it unuseable. This is most likely because

Hi, Seems like it's not linking with libm. I suspect it has to do with linking statically with libopus.a (is that intended?). Maybe opus-tools relies on the fact that libopus is linked with libm and doesn't explicitly add it? Greg? Jean-Marc On 09/24/2013 06:09 AM, bat guano wrote: > Hi > I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. > Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to

This is the config line used:- PKG_CONFIG_PATH=3D"$HOME/builds/lib/pkgconfig" LDFLAGS=3D"-L$HOME/builds/li= b" CFLAGS=3D"-I$HOME/builds/include" ./configure --prefix=3D$HOME/builds --= host=3Di686-w64-mingw32 --disable-stack-protector @xubuntu:~/builds/bin$ wine ./opusenc -V opusenc opus-tools 0.1.5 (using libopus 1.0.1) Copyright (C) 2008-2012 Xiph.Org Foundation

Hello All, This is my first appearance to the opus mailing list. My name is Michael Mehari and i am a researcher at Ghent University mainly on cognitive radio networking. Recently i am working on a demo scenario on self adjustable wireless audio conferencing and i selected opus for the audio encoding and decoding part. specifically the applications (i.e opusenc and opusdec) from opus-tools

Hi all, I am a developer for embedded system and totally new to Opus and open source audio codec. I'm now using Microchip dsPIC33 to develop a decoder for Opus. I am now using sources of libopus. The first question is for calling opus_decode(), do I need to skip the header bytes of an opus file before I can input the file data to opus_decode()? Or will libopus handle this automatically?

I am writing a program that retrieves and plays .opus files over the network. I am using the C# PInvoke wrapper OpusFileSharp, which calls into libopusfile and passes callbacks for read, seek, and tell. I want to enable seeking via the seek callback by not returning -1, but I find that as soon as I do libopusfile requests the last 64K of the .opus file, probably so it can calculate the

Hello, Been playing with libopusfile today. Ideally would like an MSVC dll rather than a static lib, but I can't see dllexports hidiing in an #ifdef anywhere. Am I just being stupid, or....? BTW that static lib is working nicely in vs2010 and up for streaming radio, though it was a real pain to have to piddle about compiling openssl on Windows! I want to write a streaming URL source filter

I don't know. Derf? -r -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [opus] opusfile 0.4 release Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:20:35 -0700 From: alpha thinktink With my old streaming thread I am able to retrieve a unicode file from a web server by converting the resource name to UTF-8 MBCS then uri encoding it before sending it to the server with "GET /[resourcename]

Hi Some Linux programs are 'static'. For example, these FFmpegs here ---> http://ffmpeg.gusari.org/static/ If we compile with Linux opusdec & opusenc & opusinfo & opusrtp using only static libraries libogg.a & libflac.a & libopus.a Are the four opus-tools programs then genuinely 'static', so that they will work on *any* Linux OS? $ ./opusenc -V opusenc

Thanks for the quick response. That makes sense. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't an easy fix, or that I wasn't overlooking something. My scenario calls for very low latency playback with a user being able to jump between many files quickly, or seek quickly. This means I am priming the pump by downloading the first chunk of many files that are likely to be started soon. I was

opusdec -V opusdec opus-tools f2a2e88 (using libopus unknown) I've got an opus file encoded from a .wav off a cd, 44100Hz: opusinfo 2-24-Overture_in_C_\(In_Memoriam\).opus Processing file "2-24-Overture_in_C_(In_Memoriam).opus"... New logical stream (#1, serial: 38134f1f): type opus Encoded with libopus unknown User comments section follows... ENCODER=opusenc from opus-tools

Hello all, Attached are patches for libopusenc, opusfile and opus-tools in order to provide support for Ambisonics and the Projection API for encoding/decoding channel mapping 253 and 254. Please feel free to ask any questions or give any feedback you might have. :) Cheers, Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 23/02/15 10:30 AM, Tony wrote: > I __think__ opus-tools' opusenc has code which can be used as a > template/sample for how to create an .Ogg file with Opus content. As > expected, it makes use of libopus and libogg. Sadly that's the best option currently. As you say it's a bit complicated, although oggenc has a lot of extra support for controlling encoder options you