similar to: Adobe Audition filter for Opus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi to everybody. First of all I hope this is the right place to discuss such an (nitpicky) issue. I've just been testing the current Opus release and for mere curiosity compared its performance to WMAPro with CD quality music at low bitrates (48 kbit/s). While Opus generally does a very good job, I found one particular example (a high pitched

Hi, I've got OpenSuSE Linux 11 KDE 3.5.10.33.2 and kernel-pae 2.6.25.18-0.2-i.686 and Wine 1.1.13 Now I'm trying to install Adobe Audition (I tried several other programs for Linux, but they can't convince me due to limitations, that is, not those possibilities like Adobe Audition). I read so many "stories" on the internet that Adobe Audition could work thru Wine under Linux,

I'm running Wine 1.1.10, configured as Windows XP, and a version of Ubuntu from four days ago. The appDB says that Adobe Audition 2.0 works fine (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=13422), but I haven't had any success yet. No exe file was installed, audition doesn't show up in wine's list of installed programs, and there's just generally no way to

Has anybody found the plug-in for Adobe Audition (formerly Cool Edit) decodes just fine, but doesn't seem to compress? I've tried saving .wav files to the compressed FLAC format in Adobe Audition & they appear to be the same size as the uncompressed .wav. The FLAC frontend works perfectly for me, & I can compress through Exact Audio Copy successfully... just not in Audition.

Can anyone recommend a codec pack with G723 for use under Vista? I have G723 prompts (about 70 prompts totaling 1MB) needing to be converted to G711 uLaw. I tried Audacity but it doesn't have G723 codecs. I tired some google found adware free tools and websites with no success in converting G723. It does appear the old Cool Edit (now Adobe Audition 3.0 for $349USD) can do it -jason

Hi All, I'm wondering about saving audio to a file. With MP3 & WMA there's support for tags - is there a file format for Opus with tag support? I guess I've missed something somewhere. Opus is excellent BTW, I use it in client/server radio communications software, http://v2.sdr-radio.com/ . Simon G4ELI/HB9DRV http://dit-dit-dit.com -------------- next part

Hi Is it possible to cross-compile opus-tools with mingw and Ubuntu? So far I have done this:- # prepare $ mkdir $HOME/source $ mkdir $HOME/builds $ export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/mingw-w64-i686/bin" $ PKG_CONFIG_PATH="$HOME/builds/lib/pkgconfig" # Install ogg $ cd $HOME/source $ svn co http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ogg $ cd ogg $ ./autogen.sh && ./configure

Hi! I haven't looked into the code yet, but the patch uses different coding conventions like "if(" and "if ("; like wise "){" and ") {". My personal taste is to have spaces after keywords, but that's just me. I'd prefer a consistent coding style. Regards, Ulrich >>> Michael Graczyk <mgraczyk at google.com> schrieb am 26.04.2016

Hi, Seems like it's not linking with libm. I suspect it has to do with linking statically with libopus.a (is that intended?). Maybe opus-tools relies on the fact that libopus is linked with libm and doesn't explicitly add it? Greg? Jean-Marc On 09/24/2013 06:09 AM, bat guano wrote: > Hi > I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. > Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to

(Please wrap your lines.) On Oct 26 01:38:34, Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. Can you please post the original wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per

Hi, Dear alls I had encounted a problem in using opus-tool-0.2-opus-1.3(download from www.opus-codec.org, Win64 binaries: opus-tools-0.2-win64.zip). First, I use opusenc to generate a opus file which input is a 9-channels wav file. The opusenc can work. Then, I use opusdec to transform the generated opus file to wav file, but opusdec can't work. I received the error message: failed to open

Hi Some Linux programs are 'static'. For example, these FFmpegs here ---> http://ffmpeg.gusari.org/static/ If we compile with Linux opusdec & opusenc & opusinfo & opusrtp using only static libraries libogg.a & libflac.a & libopus.a Are the four opus-tools programs then genuinely 'static', so that they will work on *any* Linux OS? $ ./opusenc -V opusenc

This patch adds a new option "channel-mapping" to opusenc which sets the channel mapping family used by the multistream encoder. Please let me know whether adding this option is worthwhile and whether the help string is okay. I tried to keep it short but accurate. The error message for an unimplemented channel mapping is "Error cannot create encoder: request not implemented".

Hello Tony, opusenc from opus-tools works for me.. Just tried it successfully on my x86_64 Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 box. I was just able to do $ sudo apt-get install opus-tools $ opusenc music_48kbps.wav music_48kbps.opus I remember also being able to compile opus-tools (git://git.xiph.org/opus-tools.git) some time ago. Regards, Vish On 23 February 2015 at 12:30, Tony <yellowjacketlite at

> No one has done any work on an encoder in JS that I know of Just in case there is still someone looking for an opus encoder; the opusenc tool is now available on https://github.com/Rillke/opusenc.js Demo and project website: https://blog.rillke.com/opusenc.js/ -- Rillke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

1. For starters, 32 bit support is deprecated in the next version of Mac OS X. Other things like Hardened Runtime ( https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/hardened-runtime-sandboxing.html) may not be relevant, but to make things compatible, apps need to be compiled with an SDK > 10.7. The 64 bit is the big thing. 2 & 3. I want static and can't figure out how to get it to compile. Why

Hi I'm having a problem compiling opus-tools-0.1.7. Version opus-tools-0.1.6 seems to compile OK. I've tried with opus-1.0.3 and opus-1.1-beta. The errors are like this:- "undefined reference to `sqrtf'" etc. This OS is Peppermint Three, similar to Ubuntu 12.04. It uses:- gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 Google says it's maybe something to do

Hi, Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been seeing an increase in the CPU time. In version 1.0.x, complexity 5-10 are the exactly the same for music.

Hi I am an Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/) developer and I'd like to see Audacity reading and writing Opus files as easily as it does others. What would you recommend as a way forward for this? I am thinking that (Win) we should ship opusenc.exe and opusdec.exe and send command line stuff to them; that way we wouldn't need to dip into your code and as you update we would

Thanks for your help, I will follow that, so in order to sum up I need: - libopus 1.0.3 compiled as static or shared library - libogg 1.3.1 compiled as static or shared library - opus-tools 0.1.7 and then follow the example in opus-tools opusenc.c to get things ready, because if I try to compile opus-tools, this ask for me for the speex library, and other things I think that that will we all.